{"title":"社会主义改良主义的教训:重新审视德国、瑞典和法国的社会民主主义","authors":"Saeed Rahnema","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.2085993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In hopes of attaining socialism through parliamentary and nonrevolutionary strategies, social democratic parties initially inspired by a Marxian socialist view of development and class struggle gradually distanced themselves from socialism and embraced liberal and even neo-liberal perspectives. For the proponents of a revolutionary rapturous strategy, the cause of this huge divergence was simply the takeover of socialist movements by “opportunists” and “renegades.” But the reasons were far more complicated, having to do with the continued expansion of capitalism and its global dominance, the unceasing weakness of the working class, the rise of new middle classes, and the inability of reformist agents to adopt the right policies in their confrontations with capital. Reviewing reformist theories and important cases of socialist reformist movements, this article discusses the diverse obstacles that social democratic parties faced, and their reactive policies to changing circumstances. It argues that while in the long process of the transition from capitalism, radical socialist reformism and not a revolutionary rapturous strategy was the only possible option for the socialists, in face of enormous objective and subjective obstacles, the reactive and defeatist policies of the socialist agents failed to attract the support of the working class, the rising middle class, and identitarian groups, and to find the proper strategy for advancing towards a post-capitalist society.","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"1 1","pages":"97 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons of Socialist Reformisms: Revisiting the German, Swedish, and French Social Democracies\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Rahnema\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2021.2085993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In hopes of attaining socialism through parliamentary and nonrevolutionary strategies, social democratic parties initially inspired by a Marxian socialist view of development and class struggle gradually distanced themselves from socialism and embraced liberal and even neo-liberal perspectives. For the proponents of a revolutionary rapturous strategy, the cause of this huge divergence was simply the takeover of socialist movements by “opportunists” and “renegades.” But the reasons were far more complicated, having to do with the continued expansion of capitalism and its global dominance, the unceasing weakness of the working class, the rise of new middle classes, and the inability of reformist agents to adopt the right policies in their confrontations with capital. Reviewing reformist theories and important cases of socialist reformist movements, this article discusses the diverse obstacles that social democratic parties faced, and their reactive policies to changing circumstances. It argues that while in the long process of the transition from capitalism, radical socialist reformism and not a revolutionary rapturous strategy was the only possible option for the socialists, in face of enormous objective and subjective obstacles, the reactive and defeatist policies of the socialist agents failed to attract the support of the working class, the rising middle class, and identitarian groups, and to find the proper strategy for advancing towards a post-capitalist society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"97 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2085993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2085993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lessons of Socialist Reformisms: Revisiting the German, Swedish, and French Social Democracies
In hopes of attaining socialism through parliamentary and nonrevolutionary strategies, social democratic parties initially inspired by a Marxian socialist view of development and class struggle gradually distanced themselves from socialism and embraced liberal and even neo-liberal perspectives. For the proponents of a revolutionary rapturous strategy, the cause of this huge divergence was simply the takeover of socialist movements by “opportunists” and “renegades.” But the reasons were far more complicated, having to do with the continued expansion of capitalism and its global dominance, the unceasing weakness of the working class, the rise of new middle classes, and the inability of reformist agents to adopt the right policies in their confrontations with capital. Reviewing reformist theories and important cases of socialist reformist movements, this article discusses the diverse obstacles that social democratic parties faced, and their reactive policies to changing circumstances. It argues that while in the long process of the transition from capitalism, radical socialist reformism and not a revolutionary rapturous strategy was the only possible option for the socialists, in face of enormous objective and subjective obstacles, the reactive and defeatist policies of the socialist agents failed to attract the support of the working class, the rising middle class, and identitarian groups, and to find the proper strategy for advancing towards a post-capitalist society.
期刊介绍:
Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.