BLIMP跟踪器:集成构建影响分析和代码审查

R. Wen, David Gilbert, Michael G. Roche, Shane McIntosh
{"title":"BLIMP跟踪器:集成构建影响分析和代码审查","authors":"R. Wen, David Gilbert, Michael G. Roche, Shane McIntosh","doi":"10.1109/ICSME.2018.00078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code review is an integral part of modern software development, where patch authors invite fellow developers to inspect code changes. While code review boasts technical and non-technical benefits, it is a costly use of developer time, who need to switch contexts away from their current development tasks. Since a careful code review requires even more time, developers often make intuition-based decisions about the patches that they will invest effort in carefully reviewing. Our key intuition in this paper is that patches that impact mission-critical project deliverables or deliverables that cover a broad set of products may require more reviewing effort than others. To help developers identify such patches, we introduce BLIMP Tracer, a build impact analysis system that we developed and integrated with the code review platform used by a globally distributed product team at Dell EMC, a large multinational corporation. BLIMP Tracer operates on a Build Dependency Graph (BDG) that describes how each file in the system is processed to produce the set of intermediate and output deliverables. For a given patch, BLIMP Tracer then traverses the BDG to identify the deliverables that are impacted by the change. Finally, the results are reported directly within the code review interface. To evaluate BLIMP Tracer, we conducted a qualitative study with 45 developers, observing that BLIMP Tracer not only improves the speed and accuracy of identifying the set of deliverables that are impacted by a patch, but also helps the community to better understand the project architecture.","PeriodicalId":6572,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":"1 1","pages":"685-694"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BLIMP Tracer: Integrating Build Impact Analysis with Code Review\",\"authors\":\"R. Wen, David Gilbert, Michael G. Roche, Shane McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSME.2018.00078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code review is an integral part of modern software development, where patch authors invite fellow developers to inspect code changes. While code review boasts technical and non-technical benefits, it is a costly use of developer time, who need to switch contexts away from their current development tasks. Since a careful code review requires even more time, developers often make intuition-based decisions about the patches that they will invest effort in carefully reviewing. Our key intuition in this paper is that patches that impact mission-critical project deliverables or deliverables that cover a broad set of products may require more reviewing effort than others. To help developers identify such patches, we introduce BLIMP Tracer, a build impact analysis system that we developed and integrated with the code review platform used by a globally distributed product team at Dell EMC, a large multinational corporation. BLIMP Tracer operates on a Build Dependency Graph (BDG) that describes how each file in the system is processed to produce the set of intermediate and output deliverables. For a given patch, BLIMP Tracer then traverses the BDG to identify the deliverables that are impacted by the change. Finally, the results are reported directly within the code review interface. To evaluate BLIMP Tracer, we conducted a qualitative study with 45 developers, observing that BLIMP Tracer not only improves the speed and accuracy of identifying the set of deliverables that are impacted by a patch, but also helps the community to better understand the project architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"685-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSME.2018.00078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

代码审查是现代软件开发的一个组成部分,补丁作者邀请其他开发人员检查代码更改。虽然代码审查拥有技术和非技术方面的好处,但它是对开发人员时间的昂贵使用,开发人员需要从当前的开发任务切换上下文。由于仔细的代码审查需要更多的时间,开发人员经常根据直觉做出决定,他们将投入精力仔细审查补丁。在本文中,我们的主要直觉是,影响关键任务的项目可交付成果或覆盖广泛产品集合的可交付成果的补丁可能需要比其他补丁更多的审查工作。为了帮助开发人员识别这些补丁,我们引入了BLIMP Tracer,这是一个我们开发的构建影响分析系统,并与大型跨国公司Dell EMC的全球分布式产品团队使用的代码审查平台集成在一起。BLIMP Tracer在构建依赖图(BDG)上运行,BDG描述了如何处理系统中的每个文件以产生一组中间和输出可交付成果。对于给定的补丁,BLIMP Tracer然后遍历BDG以确定受更改影响的可交付成果。最后,结果直接在代码审查界面中报告。为了评估BLIMP Tracer,我们对45名开发人员进行了定性研究,观察到BLIMP Tracer不仅提高了识别受补丁影响的交付成果集的速度和准确性,而且还帮助社区更好地理解项目架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BLIMP Tracer: Integrating Build Impact Analysis with Code Review
Code review is an integral part of modern software development, where patch authors invite fellow developers to inspect code changes. While code review boasts technical and non-technical benefits, it is a costly use of developer time, who need to switch contexts away from their current development tasks. Since a careful code review requires even more time, developers often make intuition-based decisions about the patches that they will invest effort in carefully reviewing. Our key intuition in this paper is that patches that impact mission-critical project deliverables or deliverables that cover a broad set of products may require more reviewing effort than others. To help developers identify such patches, we introduce BLIMP Tracer, a build impact analysis system that we developed and integrated with the code review platform used by a globally distributed product team at Dell EMC, a large multinational corporation. BLIMP Tracer operates on a Build Dependency Graph (BDG) that describes how each file in the system is processed to produce the set of intermediate and output deliverables. For a given patch, BLIMP Tracer then traverses the BDG to identify the deliverables that are impacted by the change. Finally, the results are reported directly within the code review interface. To evaluate BLIMP Tracer, we conducted a qualitative study with 45 developers, observing that BLIMP Tracer not only improves the speed and accuracy of identifying the set of deliverables that are impacted by a patch, but also helps the community to better understand the project architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信