四种传统多目标优化算法的性能分析与比较

Maoyang Fu, Xudong Ding, Biaokun Jia, Zhongchen Liu, Xingkai Zhao, Mei Sun
{"title":"四种传统多目标优化算法的性能分析与比较","authors":"Maoyang Fu, Xudong Ding, Biaokun Jia, Zhongchen Liu, Xingkai Zhao, Mei Sun","doi":"10.1109/ICIEA51954.2021.9516276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the development of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, more and more heuristic multi-objective algorithms are applied to the training process of data sets. In this paper, four heuristic multi-objective optimizations which were widely used in the data set training in recent years, are selected for the performance analysis and comparison. Through the comparison and analysis of the performance index for these algorithms on the benchmark problem, the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies in ensuring the convergence of the algorithm and maintaining the diversity of the solution sets are systematically expounded. The simulation results show that these algorithms have their own advantages and disadvantages in solving different specific problems, and the setting of the parameters and the initialization of the solution sets will have a great impact on the performance of the algorithm. Moreover, the different methods have the different abilities in maintaining the convergence and diversity of the solution sets. Although the complex optimization method has a better solution effect, the calculation time cost is higher. In practical application, it is necessary to select the appropriate algorithm flexibly according to the actual problems and conditions.","PeriodicalId":6809,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 16th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1513-1519"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis and Comparison of Four Conventional Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Maoyang Fu, Xudong Ding, Biaokun Jia, Zhongchen Liu, Xingkai Zhao, Mei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIEA51954.2021.9516276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the development of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, more and more heuristic multi-objective algorithms are applied to the training process of data sets. In this paper, four heuristic multi-objective optimizations which were widely used in the data set training in recent years, are selected for the performance analysis and comparison. Through the comparison and analysis of the performance index for these algorithms on the benchmark problem, the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies in ensuring the convergence of the algorithm and maintaining the diversity of the solution sets are systematically expounded. The simulation results show that these algorithms have their own advantages and disadvantages in solving different specific problems, and the setting of the parameters and the initialization of the solution sets will have a great impact on the performance of the algorithm. Moreover, the different methods have the different abilities in maintaining the convergence and diversity of the solution sets. Although the complex optimization method has a better solution effect, the calculation time cost is higher. In practical application, it is necessary to select the appropriate algorithm flexibly according to the actual problems and conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 16th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1513-1519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 16th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA51954.2021.9516276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 16th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA51954.2021.9516276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能和大数据的发展,越来越多的启发式多目标算法被应用到数据集的训练过程中。本文选取近年来在数据集训练中广泛应用的四种启发式多目标优化方法进行性能分析和比较。通过对这些算法在基准问题上的性能指标进行比较分析,系统阐述了这些策略在保证算法收敛性和保持解集多样性方面的优缺点。仿真结果表明,这些算法在解决不同的具体问题时各有优缺点,参数的设置和解集的初始化会对算法的性能产生很大的影响。此外,不同的方法在保持解集的收敛性和多样性方面具有不同的能力。复杂优化方法虽然具有较好的求解效果,但计算时间开销较高。在实际应用中,需要根据实际问题和条件灵活选择合适的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis and Comparison of Four Conventional Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms
With the development of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, more and more heuristic multi-objective algorithms are applied to the training process of data sets. In this paper, four heuristic multi-objective optimizations which were widely used in the data set training in recent years, are selected for the performance analysis and comparison. Through the comparison and analysis of the performance index for these algorithms on the benchmark problem, the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies in ensuring the convergence of the algorithm and maintaining the diversity of the solution sets are systematically expounded. The simulation results show that these algorithms have their own advantages and disadvantages in solving different specific problems, and the setting of the parameters and the initialization of the solution sets will have a great impact on the performance of the algorithm. Moreover, the different methods have the different abilities in maintaining the convergence and diversity of the solution sets. Although the complex optimization method has a better solution effect, the calculation time cost is higher. In practical application, it is necessary to select the appropriate algorithm flexibly according to the actual problems and conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信