基于深度学习的反腐败信息披露预测

V. Utomo, Tirta Yurista Kumkamdhani, Galih Setiarso
{"title":"基于深度学习的反腐败信息披露预测","authors":"V. Utomo, Tirta Yurista Kumkamdhani, Galih Setiarso","doi":"10.15575/join.v7i2.840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corruption gives major problem to many countries. It gives negative impact to a nation economy. People also realized that corruption comes from two sides, demand from the authority and supply from corporate. On that regard, corporates may have their part in fight against corruption in the form of anti- corruption disclosure (ACD). This study proposes new method of ACD prediction in corporate using deep learning. The data in this study are taken from every companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the year 2017 to 2019. The companies can be categorized in 9 categories and the data set has 8 features. The overall data has 1826 items in which 1032 items are ACD and the other 794 items are non-ACD. In this study, the deep neural network or deep learning is composed from input layer, output layer and 3 hidden layers. The deep neural network uses Adam optimizer with learning rate 0.0010, batch size 16 and epochs 500. The drop out is set to 0.05. The accuracy result from deep learning in predicting ACD is considered good with the average training accuracy is 74.76% and average testing accuracy is 76.37%. However, the loss result isn’t good with average training loss and testing loss are respectively 51.76% and 50.96%. Since the aim of the study to find the possibility of deep learning as alternative of logistic regression in ACD prediction, accuracy comparison from deep learning and logistic regression is held. Deep learning has average prediction accuracy of 76.37% is better than logistic regression with average accuracy of 67.15%. Deep learning also has higher minimum accuracy and maximum accuracy compared to logistic regression. This study concludes that deep learning may give alternatives in ACD prediction compared the more common method of logistic regression.","PeriodicalId":32019,"journal":{"name":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Corruption Disclosure Prediction Using Deep Learning\",\"authors\":\"V. Utomo, Tirta Yurista Kumkamdhani, Galih Setiarso\",\"doi\":\"10.15575/join.v7i2.840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corruption gives major problem to many countries. It gives negative impact to a nation economy. People also realized that corruption comes from two sides, demand from the authority and supply from corporate. On that regard, corporates may have their part in fight against corruption in the form of anti- corruption disclosure (ACD). This study proposes new method of ACD prediction in corporate using deep learning. The data in this study are taken from every companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the year 2017 to 2019. The companies can be categorized in 9 categories and the data set has 8 features. The overall data has 1826 items in which 1032 items are ACD and the other 794 items are non-ACD. In this study, the deep neural network or deep learning is composed from input layer, output layer and 3 hidden layers. The deep neural network uses Adam optimizer with learning rate 0.0010, batch size 16 and epochs 500. The drop out is set to 0.05. The accuracy result from deep learning in predicting ACD is considered good with the average training accuracy is 74.76% and average testing accuracy is 76.37%. However, the loss result isn’t good with average training loss and testing loss are respectively 51.76% and 50.96%. Since the aim of the study to find the possibility of deep learning as alternative of logistic regression in ACD prediction, accuracy comparison from deep learning and logistic regression is held. Deep learning has average prediction accuracy of 76.37% is better than logistic regression with average accuracy of 67.15%. Deep learning also has higher minimum accuracy and maximum accuracy compared to logistic regression. This study concludes that deep learning may give alternatives in ACD prediction compared the more common method of logistic regression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v7i2.840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v7i2.840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腐败是许多国家面临的主要问题。它给一个国家的经济带来负面影响。人们也意识到腐败来自两个方面,即来自当局的需求和来自企业的供给。在这方面,企业可以透过反贪污披露(ACD)的形式,参与打击贪污。本研究提出了利用深度学习进行企业ACD预测的新方法。本研究中的数据来自2017年至2019年在印度尼西亚证券交易所(IDX)上市的所有公司。这些公司可以分为9类,数据集有8个特征。整体数据有1826项,其中1032项为ACD,其余794项为非ACD。在本研究中,深度神经网络或深度学习由输入层、输出层和3个隐藏层组成。深度神经网络使用Adam优化器,学习率为0.0010,批大小为16,epoch为500。drop out设置为0.05。深度学习预测ACD的准确率较好,平均训练准确率为74.76%,平均测试准确率为76.37%。然而,损失效果并不好,平均训练损失和测试损失分别为51.76%和50.96%。由于研究的目的是寻找深度学习替代逻辑回归在ACD预测中的可能性,因此进行了深度学习和逻辑回归的准确性比较。深度学习的平均预测准确率为76.37%,优于逻辑回归的平均预测准确率为67.15%。与逻辑回归相比,深度学习也具有更高的最小精度和最大精度。本研究的结论是,与更常见的逻辑回归方法相比,深度学习可以为ACD预测提供替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Corruption Disclosure Prediction Using Deep Learning
Corruption gives major problem to many countries. It gives negative impact to a nation economy. People also realized that corruption comes from two sides, demand from the authority and supply from corporate. On that regard, corporates may have their part in fight against corruption in the form of anti- corruption disclosure (ACD). This study proposes new method of ACD prediction in corporate using deep learning. The data in this study are taken from every companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the year 2017 to 2019. The companies can be categorized in 9 categories and the data set has 8 features. The overall data has 1826 items in which 1032 items are ACD and the other 794 items are non-ACD. In this study, the deep neural network or deep learning is composed from input layer, output layer and 3 hidden layers. The deep neural network uses Adam optimizer with learning rate 0.0010, batch size 16 and epochs 500. The drop out is set to 0.05. The accuracy result from deep learning in predicting ACD is considered good with the average training accuracy is 74.76% and average testing accuracy is 76.37%. However, the loss result isn’t good with average training loss and testing loss are respectively 51.76% and 50.96%. Since the aim of the study to find the possibility of deep learning as alternative of logistic regression in ACD prediction, accuracy comparison from deep learning and logistic regression is held. Deep learning has average prediction accuracy of 76.37% is better than logistic regression with average accuracy of 67.15%. Deep learning also has higher minimum accuracy and maximum accuracy compared to logistic regression. This study concludes that deep learning may give alternatives in ACD prediction compared the more common method of logistic regression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信