大学年龄女性对体能测试的情感反应

Q1 Social Sciences
Alyssa M Abreu, Jessica Thompson, Danielle Cofield, M. Faries, E. Jones
{"title":"大学年龄女性对体能测试的情感反应","authors":"Alyssa M Abreu, Jessica Thompson, Danielle Cofield, M. Faries, E. Jones","doi":"10.1123/wspaj.2021-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical inactivity is common among women and a quarter of college-aged women are classified as overweight or obese, making this population an important target for obesity prevention. Fitness testing is commonplace, and practitioners can hold an underlying belief that discrepancies will promote positive responses. However, little research has examined the affective responses to fitness testing in adults. The purpose of this study was to assess the affective responses to common fitness testing, while examining relationships to physical self to help elucidate why some respond to such testing and others do not. Forty-eight college-aged women were presented with their discrepancy from a normative standard across six fitness tests. Findings support previous conceptualizations on discrepancies and affective responses, in that greater negative discrepancies from normative standards were associated with greater changes in negative feeling states. In addition, the results suggest that only certain discrepancies pose a threat to perceived satisfaction with one’s physical self (i.e., self-concept)—mainly though subdomains related to body appearance and aerobic fitness. In other words, the greater the perceived satisfaction of self, the greater negative emotional response was experienced to the specific test discrepancy. The notation of “threats” to important domains of self-concept might help explain why fitness testing that alerts individuals where they are discrepant produce behavioral changes in some but not others. Professionals should consider the impact of providing fitness test discrepancies on negative affective responses, with the possible impact on motivation and future behavior choices to reduce the discrepancy.","PeriodicalId":36995,"journal":{"name":"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affective Responses to Fitness Testing in College-Aged Women\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa M Abreu, Jessica Thompson, Danielle Cofield, M. Faries, E. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/wspaj.2021-0032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical inactivity is common among women and a quarter of college-aged women are classified as overweight or obese, making this population an important target for obesity prevention. Fitness testing is commonplace, and practitioners can hold an underlying belief that discrepancies will promote positive responses. However, little research has examined the affective responses to fitness testing in adults. The purpose of this study was to assess the affective responses to common fitness testing, while examining relationships to physical self to help elucidate why some respond to such testing and others do not. Forty-eight college-aged women were presented with their discrepancy from a normative standard across six fitness tests. Findings support previous conceptualizations on discrepancies and affective responses, in that greater negative discrepancies from normative standards were associated with greater changes in negative feeling states. In addition, the results suggest that only certain discrepancies pose a threat to perceived satisfaction with one’s physical self (i.e., self-concept)—mainly though subdomains related to body appearance and aerobic fitness. In other words, the greater the perceived satisfaction of self, the greater negative emotional response was experienced to the specific test discrepancy. The notation of “threats” to important domains of self-concept might help explain why fitness testing that alerts individuals where they are discrepant produce behavioral changes in some but not others. Professionals should consider the impact of providing fitness test discrepancies on negative affective responses, with the possible impact on motivation and future behavior choices to reduce the discrepancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2021-0032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2021-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏运动在女性中很常见,四分之一的大学年龄女性被归类为超重或肥胖,这使得这一人群成为预防肥胖的重要目标。健康测试是司空见惯的,从业者可以持有一种潜在的信念,即差异将促进积极的反应。然而,很少有研究调查了成年人对体能测试的情感反应。本研究的目的是评估对普通体能测试的情感反应,同时检查与身体自我的关系,以帮助阐明为什么有些人对这种测试有反应,而其他人没有。研究人员向48名大学年龄的女性展示了她们在六项健康测试中与标准标准的差异。研究结果支持了先前关于差异和情感反应的概念,即与规范标准的较大负面差异与负面感觉状态的较大变化相关。此外,研究结果表明,只有某些差异会对一个人的身体自我(即自我概念)的感知满意度构成威胁——主要是通过与身体外观和有氧健身相关的子域。换句话说,自我感知满意度越大,对特定测试差异的负面情绪反应越大。对自我概念重要领域的“威胁”符号可能有助于解释为什么健康测试会提醒个体他们在哪些方面存在差异,从而导致一些人的行为改变,而另一些人却没有。专业人员应该考虑提供体能测试差异对负面情感反应的影响,以及可能对动机和未来行为选择的影响,以减少差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Affective Responses to Fitness Testing in College-Aged Women
Physical inactivity is common among women and a quarter of college-aged women are classified as overweight or obese, making this population an important target for obesity prevention. Fitness testing is commonplace, and practitioners can hold an underlying belief that discrepancies will promote positive responses. However, little research has examined the affective responses to fitness testing in adults. The purpose of this study was to assess the affective responses to common fitness testing, while examining relationships to physical self to help elucidate why some respond to such testing and others do not. Forty-eight college-aged women were presented with their discrepancy from a normative standard across six fitness tests. Findings support previous conceptualizations on discrepancies and affective responses, in that greater negative discrepancies from normative standards were associated with greater changes in negative feeling states. In addition, the results suggest that only certain discrepancies pose a threat to perceived satisfaction with one’s physical self (i.e., self-concept)—mainly though subdomains related to body appearance and aerobic fitness. In other words, the greater the perceived satisfaction of self, the greater negative emotional response was experienced to the specific test discrepancy. The notation of “threats” to important domains of self-concept might help explain why fitness testing that alerts individuals where they are discrepant produce behavioral changes in some but not others. Professionals should consider the impact of providing fitness test discrepancies on negative affective responses, with the possible impact on motivation and future behavior choices to reduce the discrepancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信