Taghi Bararpour, Nicholas E. Korres, J. Argenta, T. Tseng
{"title":"黄藜草(Cyperus esculentus L.)和强生草(Sorghum halepense L.)除草剂防治效果评价非作物条件下","authors":"Taghi Bararpour, Nicholas E. Korres, J. Argenta, T. Tseng","doi":"10.5539/jas.v15n3p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) are two of the most difficult weeds to control mostly due to their asexual reproduction. Yellow nutsedge reproduces through underground tubers and Johnsongrass through rhizomes. In addition, Johnsongrass is a problematic weed because of its competitive nature due to its C4 carbon fixation pathway metabolism. It typically grows to 1.8 to 2.5 m tall and can severely reduce yields in corn, cotton, soybeans, and other crops. Two separate field studies were conducted in 2020 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate the effectiveness of various herbicides on yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass control in a non-crop scenario. The experiments were conducted as randomized complete block designs with 7 and 11 herbicide treatments for yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass, respectively. All treatments were replicated three times. Research plots were 4-m wide and 6-m long with 3-m alleys between replications. The 7 yellow nutsedge herbicide treatments consisted of trifloxysulfuron, bentazon, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + thifensulfuron, glyphosate, glufosinate, and paraquat. The 11 Johnsongrass herbicide treatments included clethodim, quizalofop, fluazifop, cyhalofop, fenoxaprop, pinoxaden, glufosinate, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate. Glyphosate and halosulfuron + thifensulfuron provided only 77 and 72% control of yellow nutsedge by five-weeks after application (WAA). On the other hand, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate provided 99 to 100% Johnsongrass control 4 WAA. Johnsongrass regrowth evaluation was assessed 3-weeks after the experimental area was mowed. Johnsongrass regrew in every herbicide treatment except for glyphosate which was the only treatment that provided 100% Johnsongrass control with no-regrowth.","PeriodicalId":14884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Herbicides for the Control of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) Under Non-Crop Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Taghi Bararpour, Nicholas E. Korres, J. Argenta, T. Tseng\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/jas.v15n3p1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) are two of the most difficult weeds to control mostly due to their asexual reproduction. Yellow nutsedge reproduces through underground tubers and Johnsongrass through rhizomes. In addition, Johnsongrass is a problematic weed because of its competitive nature due to its C4 carbon fixation pathway metabolism. It typically grows to 1.8 to 2.5 m tall and can severely reduce yields in corn, cotton, soybeans, and other crops. Two separate field studies were conducted in 2020 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate the effectiveness of various herbicides on yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass control in a non-crop scenario. The experiments were conducted as randomized complete block designs with 7 and 11 herbicide treatments for yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass, respectively. All treatments were replicated three times. Research plots were 4-m wide and 6-m long with 3-m alleys between replications. The 7 yellow nutsedge herbicide treatments consisted of trifloxysulfuron, bentazon, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + thifensulfuron, glyphosate, glufosinate, and paraquat. The 11 Johnsongrass herbicide treatments included clethodim, quizalofop, fluazifop, cyhalofop, fenoxaprop, pinoxaden, glufosinate, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate. Glyphosate and halosulfuron + thifensulfuron provided only 77 and 72% control of yellow nutsedge by five-weeks after application (WAA). On the other hand, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate provided 99 to 100% Johnsongrass control 4 WAA. Johnsongrass regrowth evaluation was assessed 3-weeks after the experimental area was mowed. Johnsongrass regrew in every herbicide treatment except for glyphosate which was the only treatment that provided 100% Johnsongrass control with no-regrowth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v15n3p1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v15n3p1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Herbicides for the Control of Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.) Under Non-Crop Conditions
Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.) are two of the most difficult weeds to control mostly due to their asexual reproduction. Yellow nutsedge reproduces through underground tubers and Johnsongrass through rhizomes. In addition, Johnsongrass is a problematic weed because of its competitive nature due to its C4 carbon fixation pathway metabolism. It typically grows to 1.8 to 2.5 m tall and can severely reduce yields in corn, cotton, soybeans, and other crops. Two separate field studies were conducted in 2020 at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, Mississippi to evaluate the effectiveness of various herbicides on yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass control in a non-crop scenario. The experiments were conducted as randomized complete block designs with 7 and 11 herbicide treatments for yellow nutsedge and Johnsongrass, respectively. All treatments were replicated three times. Research plots were 4-m wide and 6-m long with 3-m alleys between replications. The 7 yellow nutsedge herbicide treatments consisted of trifloxysulfuron, bentazon, halosulfuron, halosulfuron + thifensulfuron, glyphosate, glufosinate, and paraquat. The 11 Johnsongrass herbicide treatments included clethodim, quizalofop, fluazifop, cyhalofop, fenoxaprop, pinoxaden, glufosinate, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate. Glyphosate and halosulfuron + thifensulfuron provided only 77 and 72% control of yellow nutsedge by five-weeks after application (WAA). On the other hand, glyphosate, clethodim + glyphosate, glufosinate + clethodim, and glufosinate + clethodim + glyphosate provided 99 to 100% Johnsongrass control 4 WAA. Johnsongrass regrowth evaluation was assessed 3-weeks after the experimental area was mowed. Johnsongrass regrew in every herbicide treatment except for glyphosate which was the only treatment that provided 100% Johnsongrass control with no-regrowth.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agricultural Science publishes papers concerned with the advance of agriculture and the use of land resources throughout the world. It publishes original scientific work related to strategic and applied studies in all aspects of agricultural science and exploited species, as well as reviews of scientific topics of current agricultural relevance. Specific topics of interest include (but are not confined to): all aspects of crop and animal physiology, modelling of crop and animal systems, the scientific underpinning of agronomy and husbandry, animal welfare and behaviour, soil science, plant and animal product quality, plant and animal nutrition, engineering solutions, decision support systems, land use, environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry, impacts of climate change, rural biodiversity, experimental design and statistical analysis, and the application of new analytical and study methods (including genetic diversity and molecular biology approaches). The journal also publishes book reviews and letters. Occasional themed issues are published which have recently included centenary reviews, wheat papers and modelling animal systems.