亚轴向脊柱损伤的放射学综合评价

J. Naqvi, S. I. Ali, V. Parmar, C. Oh, S. Beardmore, N. Subedi
{"title":"亚轴向脊柱损伤的放射学综合评价","authors":"J. Naqvi, S. I. Ali, V. Parmar, C. Oh, S. Beardmore, N. Subedi","doi":"10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management. \nSeveral classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture. \nThe aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.","PeriodicalId":52856,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Medical Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Radiological Assessment of Sub-axial Spinal Injury\",\"authors\":\"J. Naqvi, S. I. Ali, V. Parmar, C. Oh, S. Beardmore, N. Subedi\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management. \\nSeveral classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture. \\nThe aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nepalese Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nepalese Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/NMJ.V2I1.24351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射科医生经常在创伤的情况下解释脊柱的横断成像。损伤脊柱的机械稳定性是指导进一步治疗的最重要因素。过去已经开发了几种分类系统,以帮助放射科医生判断潜在的不稳定损伤。放射科医生最熟悉的是基于损伤形态和机制的丹尼斯分类系统。该系统被批评过于简单,没有预后价值,缺乏对患者神经系统状态的考虑。AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft f r osteosynthesis efragen)和TLICS(胸腰椎损伤分类和严重程度评分)分类系统是下一个主要的进化,它们强调了后韧带复合体(PLC)和患者神经系统状态在预测潜在不稳定骨折中的重要性。这篇图片综述的目的是让放射科医生熟悉新的分类系统,以提高他们的图像解释技能,并促进与脊柱外科医生的有效沟通。图像示例旨在说明各种伤害类型以及如何根据上述分类系统对其进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Radiological Assessment of Sub-axial Spinal Injury
Radiologists frequently interpret cross-sectional imaging of the spine in the setting of trauma. Mechanical stability of the traumatised spine is the single most important factor which guides further management. Several classification systems have been developed over the past to assist radiologists to judge the potentially unstable injuries. The radiologists are arguably most familiar with Denis system of classification which is based on injury morphology and mechanism. This system has been criticised for being too simple, not prognostically valuable and lack of consideration of patients' neurological status. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) and TLICS (Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score ) classification systems are the next major evolutions which highlight the importance of the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) and neurological status of the patients in predicting the potentially unstable fracture. The aim of this pictorial review is to familiarise radiologists with newer classification systems to improve their image interpretation skills and promote efficient communication with spinal surgeons. The pictorial examples are intended to illustrate the various injury types and how to classify them according to the aforementioned classification systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信