私人语言的争论:柏拉图的另一个脚注?

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Symposion Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5840/symposion20229214

Arnold Cusmariu

引用次数: 0

摘要

一个有效的、合理的私人语言论证是建立在维特根斯坦的哲学研究基础上的前提，并辅以熟悉的分析区别和逻辑概念。这里提出的私人语言问题和解决方案似乎可以追溯到柏拉图的《洞穴寓言》。两篇文献都忽略了其中的联系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Private Language Argument: Another Footnote to Plato?

A valid and arguably sound private language argument is built using premises based on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations augmented by familiar analytic distinctions and concepts of logic. The private language problem and the solution presented here can be plausibly traced to Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Both literatures missed the connection.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Symposion Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Symposion was published for the first time in 2003, as Symposion – Revistă de științe socio-umane (Symposion – A Journal of Humanities), with the purpose of providing a supportive space for academic communication, dialogue, and debate, both intra and interdisciplinary, for philosophical humanities and social and political sciences. Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences shares essentially the same purpose. Its main aim is to promote and provide open access to peer-reviewed, high quality contributions (articles, discussion notes, review essays or book reviews) in philosophy, other humanities, and social and political sciences connected with philosophy.