儿童谵妄量表的开发和初步探索性验证:评估一种新型谵妄量表的可行性和可及性

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
E. Dodenhoff, Neha Gupta, Lauren Craig, M. Pate, Sarah D. Petrusnek, Nianlan Yang, Kimberly Smith, A. Woolley, Yesie Yoon, Tapan Mehta, L. Hayes
{"title":"儿童谵妄量表的开发和初步探索性验证:评估一种新型谵妄量表的可行性和可及性","authors":"E. Dodenhoff, Neha Gupta, Lauren Craig, M. Pate, Sarah D. Petrusnek, Nianlan Yang, Kimberly Smith, A. Woolley, Yesie Yoon, Tapan Mehta, L. Hayes","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Delirium screening and identification in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can be a diagnostic challenge. Primarily, the burden of screening falls on the bedside nurses, who are juggling countless tasks throughout their shift. The nursing staff at the researcher's institution were concerned that the existing screen, Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), detracted from workflow. The PEdiatric Delirium Scale (PEDS) was developed to accurately identify delirium in children of all developmental abilities and improve nursing workflow. This is a single-center, double-blinded, preliminary exploratory validation study that assesses the feasibility and accessibility of PEDS. This study was performed in a busy 24-bed quaternary PICU serving a diverse, noncardiac patient population. Enrolled patients underwent screening for delirium using the CAPD and PEDS. These results were compared to the gold standard psychiatric evaluation to determine the validity of the novel screen. Finally, the surveyed nurses reviewed their experience with CAPD and PEDS. The primary outcome was to explore the validation of PEDS in the PICU. Using the Youden index, an overall sensitivity of 79% for the detection of delirium (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–0.91) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 0.64–0.73) were achieved with an optimal cut-point of 4, on a scale of 0 to 10. PEDS demonstrated a higher predictive value compared to CAPD. Elicited nursing feedback favored PEDS over CAPD, with 86% of respondents citing a shorter time to perform the screen. PEDS is a streamlined tool that can be used to detect pediatric delirium regardless of developmental abilities. Nursing surveys revealed improved workflow when comparing PEDS to CAPD.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development and Preliminary Exploratory Validation of the PEdiatric Delirium Scale: Assessing the Feasibility and Accessibility of a Novel Delirium Scale\",\"authors\":\"E. Dodenhoff, Neha Gupta, Lauren Craig, M. Pate, Sarah D. Petrusnek, Nianlan Yang, Kimberly Smith, A. Woolley, Yesie Yoon, Tapan Mehta, L. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Delirium screening and identification in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can be a diagnostic challenge. Primarily, the burden of screening falls on the bedside nurses, who are juggling countless tasks throughout their shift. The nursing staff at the researcher's institution were concerned that the existing screen, Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), detracted from workflow. The PEdiatric Delirium Scale (PEDS) was developed to accurately identify delirium in children of all developmental abilities and improve nursing workflow. This is a single-center, double-blinded, preliminary exploratory validation study that assesses the feasibility and accessibility of PEDS. This study was performed in a busy 24-bed quaternary PICU serving a diverse, noncardiac patient population. Enrolled patients underwent screening for delirium using the CAPD and PEDS. These results were compared to the gold standard psychiatric evaluation to determine the validity of the novel screen. Finally, the surveyed nurses reviewed their experience with CAPD and PEDS. The primary outcome was to explore the validation of PEDS in the PICU. Using the Youden index, an overall sensitivity of 79% for the detection of delirium (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–0.91) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 0.64–0.73) were achieved with an optimal cut-point of 4, on a scale of 0 to 10. PEDS demonstrated a higher predictive value compared to CAPD. Elicited nursing feedback favored PEDS over CAPD, with 86% of respondents citing a shorter time to perform the screen. PEDS is a streamlined tool that can be used to detect pediatric delirium regardless of developmental abilities. Nursing surveys revealed improved workflow when comparing PEDS to CAPD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行谵妄筛查和鉴定是一项诊断挑战。首先,筛查的负担落在了病床旁的护士身上,他们在轮班期间要处理无数的任务。研究人员所在机构的护理人员担心现有的筛查,康奈尔儿童谵妄评估(CAPD),偏离了工作流程。制定儿童谵妄量表(PEDS)是为了准确识别所有发育能力儿童的谵妄,并改善护理工作流程。这是一项单中心、双盲、初步探索性验证研究,旨在评估PEDS的可行性和可及性。这项研究是在一个繁忙的24床第四重症监护室进行的,服务于不同的非心脏患者群体。纳入的患者使用CAPD和PEDS进行谵妄筛查。这些结果与金标准精神病学评估相比较,以确定新屏幕的有效性。最后,接受调查的护士回顾了他们在CAPD和PEDS的经历。主要目的是探讨PICU中PEDS的有效性。使用约登指数,谵妄检测的总体灵敏度为79%(95%置信区间[CI]: 0.61-0.91),特异性为68% (95% CI: 0.64-0.73),在0到10的范围内,最佳临界值为4。与CAPD相比,PEDS具有更高的预测价值。与CAPD相比,引发的护理反馈更青睐PEDS, 86%的受访者表示执行筛查的时间更短。PEDS是一种简化的工具,可用于检测儿童谵妄,而不考虑发育能力。护理调查显示,当比较PEDS和CAPD时,工作流程得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Development and Preliminary Exploratory Validation of the PEdiatric Delirium Scale: Assessing the Feasibility and Accessibility of a Novel Delirium Scale
Abstract Delirium screening and identification in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) can be a diagnostic challenge. Primarily, the burden of screening falls on the bedside nurses, who are juggling countless tasks throughout their shift. The nursing staff at the researcher's institution were concerned that the existing screen, Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium (CAPD), detracted from workflow. The PEdiatric Delirium Scale (PEDS) was developed to accurately identify delirium in children of all developmental abilities and improve nursing workflow. This is a single-center, double-blinded, preliminary exploratory validation study that assesses the feasibility and accessibility of PEDS. This study was performed in a busy 24-bed quaternary PICU serving a diverse, noncardiac patient population. Enrolled patients underwent screening for delirium using the CAPD and PEDS. These results were compared to the gold standard psychiatric evaluation to determine the validity of the novel screen. Finally, the surveyed nurses reviewed their experience with CAPD and PEDS. The primary outcome was to explore the validation of PEDS in the PICU. Using the Youden index, an overall sensitivity of 79% for the detection of delirium (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–0.91) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI: 0.64–0.73) were achieved with an optimal cut-point of 4, on a scale of 0 to 10. PEDS demonstrated a higher predictive value compared to CAPD. Elicited nursing feedback favored PEDS over CAPD, with 86% of respondents citing a shorter time to perform the screen. PEDS is a streamlined tool that can be used to detect pediatric delirium regardless of developmental abilities. Nursing surveys revealed improved workflow when comparing PEDS to CAPD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信