环境保护民法典草案

IF 0.2 0 ART
Živorad Rašević
{"title":"环境保护民法典草案","authors":"Živorad Rašević","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2282257r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 11 of the draft Serbian Civil Code establishes a precedent, i.e. the principle of environmental protection. It is manifested as an accessory popular civil duty erga omnes, a protected public good, and a means of civil rights? restriction. This paper investigates whether this new institution of civil law is necessary or at least opportune, purposeful and harmonized with positive law. The results of comparative and doctrinal insights indicate that the answers to these questions are affirmative. However, certain shortcomings of the proposed provision are found: the lack of a duty to restrain from environmental harm, the absence of the individual environmental right and the undefined impact on civil affairs and on the enjoyment of civil rights. Given the vague and blanket nature of the provision, these shortcomings can be remedied by broader interpretations and references to the rules of public and environmental law, ethics and intergenerational solidarity. This paper suggests another possibility, i.e. the intervention in the proposed text of the provision to complete the future civil law legislation and integrated environmental protection.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental protection in the draft civil code\",\"authors\":\"Živorad Rašević\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/zmsdn2282257r\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 11 of the draft Serbian Civil Code establishes a precedent, i.e. the principle of environmental protection. It is manifested as an accessory popular civil duty erga omnes, a protected public good, and a means of civil rights? restriction. This paper investigates whether this new institution of civil law is necessary or at least opportune, purposeful and harmonized with positive law. The results of comparative and doctrinal insights indicate that the answers to these questions are affirmative. However, certain shortcomings of the proposed provision are found: the lack of a duty to restrain from environmental harm, the absence of the individual environmental right and the undefined impact on civil affairs and on the enjoyment of civil rights. Given the vague and blanket nature of the provision, these shortcomings can be remedied by broader interpretations and references to the rules of public and environmental law, ethics and intergenerational solidarity. This paper suggests another possibility, i.e. the intervention in the proposed text of the provision to complete the future civil law legislation and integrated environmental protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2282257r\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2282257r","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

塞尔维亚民法典草案第11条确立了一个先例,即环境保护原则。它表现为一种普遍的公民义务的附属品,一种受保护的公共产品,一种公民权利的手段。限制。本文考察了这一新的民法制度是否必要,或者至少是时机、目的和与成文法的协调。比较和教义见解的结果表明,这些问题的答案是肯定的。但是,也发现了该条款的不足之处:缺乏对环境损害的约束义务,缺乏个人环境权,对民事和民事权利享受的影响不明确。鉴于这项规定的含糊和笼统性质,这些缺点可以通过更广泛的解释和引用公共和环境法、道德和代际团结的规则来弥补。本文提出了另一种可能性,即在拟议文本中介入该条款,以完成未来民法立法和综合环境保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental protection in the draft civil code
Article 11 of the draft Serbian Civil Code establishes a precedent, i.e. the principle of environmental protection. It is manifested as an accessory popular civil duty erga omnes, a protected public good, and a means of civil rights? restriction. This paper investigates whether this new institution of civil law is necessary or at least opportune, purposeful and harmonized with positive law. The results of comparative and doctrinal insights indicate that the answers to these questions are affirmative. However, certain shortcomings of the proposed provision are found: the lack of a duty to restrain from environmental harm, the absence of the individual environmental right and the undefined impact on civil affairs and on the enjoyment of civil rights. Given the vague and blanket nature of the provision, these shortcomings can be remedied by broader interpretations and references to the rules of public and environmental law, ethics and intergenerational solidarity. This paper suggests another possibility, i.e. the intervention in the proposed text of the provision to complete the future civil law legislation and integrated environmental protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信