考虑桥面玻璃钢钢筋粘结的方法

玻璃钢 Pub Date : 1999-08-01 DOI:10.14359/5640
C. Shield, C. French, J. Hanus
{"title":"考虑桥面玻璃钢钢筋粘结的方法","authors":"C. Shield, C. French, J. Hanus","doi":"10.14359/5640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of non-metallic bridge deck reinforcement is of interest in regions where corrosion is a problem. A number of manufacturers have developed GFRP rebar for this application. Because the production of the material is relatively new, there is a great deal of variability among the products from different manufacturers. In addition, as the manufacturers continue to develop their own product, variations in GFRP from single manufacturers have been observed. The objective of this study was to investigate the bond between GFRP reinforcement and concrete using inverted half-beam specimen. The inverted half-beam specimen were designed to simulate the conditions likely to be found in a bridge deck (no transverse reinforcement and small concrete cover). Products from two different manufacturers were chosen for the study because of the widely varying characteristics of the product. One manufacturer produced reinforcement with surface deformations created by a helical wrap of glass fibers around the GFRP bar; the other manufacturer developed a ceramic coating that emulated the surface texture of a deformed steel bar. The two different bar types exhibited different bond behaviors. The bond for the bars with the ceramic deformations relied most heavily on mechanical interlock, as was evident from cracking patterns. The bond for the bars with the helical wrap deformations relied most heavily on friction. Both bar types demonstrated large variability for the bond specimen that failed in bar fracture, with some bar failure loads more than two standard deviations below the average bar tensile strength.","PeriodicalId":68258,"journal":{"name":"玻璃钢","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Reinforcing Bar for Consideration in Bridge Decks\",\"authors\":\"C. Shield, C. French, J. Hanus\",\"doi\":\"10.14359/5640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of non-metallic bridge deck reinforcement is of interest in regions where corrosion is a problem. A number of manufacturers have developed GFRP rebar for this application. Because the production of the material is relatively new, there is a great deal of variability among the products from different manufacturers. In addition, as the manufacturers continue to develop their own product, variations in GFRP from single manufacturers have been observed. The objective of this study was to investigate the bond between GFRP reinforcement and concrete using inverted half-beam specimen. The inverted half-beam specimen were designed to simulate the conditions likely to be found in a bridge deck (no transverse reinforcement and small concrete cover). Products from two different manufacturers were chosen for the study because of the widely varying characteristics of the product. One manufacturer produced reinforcement with surface deformations created by a helical wrap of glass fibers around the GFRP bar; the other manufacturer developed a ceramic coating that emulated the surface texture of a deformed steel bar. The two different bar types exhibited different bond behaviors. The bond for the bars with the ceramic deformations relied most heavily on mechanical interlock, as was evident from cracking patterns. The bond for the bars with the helical wrap deformations relied most heavily on friction. Both bar types demonstrated large variability for the bond specimen that failed in bar fracture, with some bar failure loads more than two standard deviations below the average bar tensile strength.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"玻璃钢\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"玻璃钢\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14359/5640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"玻璃钢","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/5640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在腐蚀问题严重的地区,使用非金属桥面加固是很有意义的。许多制造商已经为这种应用开发了玻璃钢钢筋。由于材料的生产相对较新,因此不同制造商的产品之间存在很大差异。此外,随着制造商继续开发自己的产品,已经观察到单个制造商的GFRP变化。本研究的目的是研究GFRP筋与混凝土之间的粘结采用倒半梁试件。倒置半梁试件的设计是为了模拟可能在桥面中发现的情况(没有横向钢筋和小混凝土覆盖层)。选择来自两个不同制造商的产品进行研究,因为产品的特性差异很大。一家制造商通过在玻璃钢棒周围缠绕螺旋形玻璃纤维而产生表面变形来生产钢筋;另一家制造商开发了一种陶瓷涂层,模拟了变形钢筋的表面纹理。两种棒材表现出不同的键合行为。从裂纹模式可以明显看出,具有陶瓷变形的棒的结合主要依赖于机械联锁。具有螺旋缠绕变形的棒材的结合主要依赖于摩擦。两种类型的杆在断裂时都表现出很大的变化,一些杆的破坏载荷比平均杆的抗拉强度低两个标准差以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bond of Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Reinforcing Bar for Consideration in Bridge Decks
The use of non-metallic bridge deck reinforcement is of interest in regions where corrosion is a problem. A number of manufacturers have developed GFRP rebar for this application. Because the production of the material is relatively new, there is a great deal of variability among the products from different manufacturers. In addition, as the manufacturers continue to develop their own product, variations in GFRP from single manufacturers have been observed. The objective of this study was to investigate the bond between GFRP reinforcement and concrete using inverted half-beam specimen. The inverted half-beam specimen were designed to simulate the conditions likely to be found in a bridge deck (no transverse reinforcement and small concrete cover). Products from two different manufacturers were chosen for the study because of the widely varying characteristics of the product. One manufacturer produced reinforcement with surface deformations created by a helical wrap of glass fibers around the GFRP bar; the other manufacturer developed a ceramic coating that emulated the surface texture of a deformed steel bar. The two different bar types exhibited different bond behaviors. The bond for the bars with the ceramic deformations relied most heavily on mechanical interlock, as was evident from cracking patterns. The bond for the bars with the helical wrap deformations relied most heavily on friction. Both bar types demonstrated large variability for the bond specimen that failed in bar fracture, with some bar failure loads more than two standard deviations below the average bar tensile strength.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
357
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信