墨家的推理逻辑(英文)Leis和结构化排序

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
T. Lucas
{"title":"墨家的推理逻辑(英文)Leis和结构化排序","authors":"T. Lucas","doi":"10.7065/MRPC.201008.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well-known that some Mohist reasonings of the final portion of the Xiao qu 〈小取〉 are paradoxical: “a robber is a man, but to kill a robber is not to kill a man”. In this paper, we analyze and formalize the different groups of Mohist reasonings using concepts of contemporary western logic: classes, sorts, structured sorts as they appear in the mathematical theory of categories. We solve those paradoxes by using sorts and more generally arrive at the conclusion that those reasonings are based on structured sorts, a notion which, in our opinion, is fundamental to clarify the notion of lei (類).","PeriodicalId":41207,"journal":{"name":"UNIVERSITAS-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture","volume":"12 1","pages":"65-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Logic of Mohist Reasonings; Leis and Structured Sorts\",\"authors\":\"T. Lucas\",\"doi\":\"10.7065/MRPC.201008.0065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is well-known that some Mohist reasonings of the final portion of the Xiao qu 〈小取〉 are paradoxical: “a robber is a man, but to kill a robber is not to kill a man”. In this paper, we analyze and formalize the different groups of Mohist reasonings using concepts of contemporary western logic: classes, sorts, structured sorts as they appear in the mathematical theory of categories. We solve those paradoxes by using sorts and more generally arrive at the conclusion that those reasonings are based on structured sorts, a notion which, in our opinion, is fundamental to clarify the notion of lei (類).\",\"PeriodicalId\":41207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNIVERSITAS-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"65-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNIVERSITAS-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201008.0065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIVERSITAS-Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7065/MRPC.201008.0065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

众所周知,墨家对《小曲》最后部分的一些推理是矛盾的:“强盗是人,但杀死强盗不等于杀死人”。在本文中,我们使用当代西方逻辑的概念来分析和形式化墨家推理的不同群体:类、类、结构类,因为它们出现在数学范畴理论中。我们通过使用排序来解决这些悖论,并且更普遍地得出结论,即这些推理是基于结构化排序的,在我们看来,这个概念是澄清lei (lei)概念的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Logic of Mohist Reasonings; Leis and Structured Sorts
It is well-known that some Mohist reasonings of the final portion of the Xiao qu 〈小取〉 are paradoxical: “a robber is a man, but to kill a robber is not to kill a man”. In this paper, we analyze and formalize the different groups of Mohist reasonings using concepts of contemporary western logic: classes, sorts, structured sorts as they appear in the mathematical theory of categories. We solve those paradoxes by using sorts and more generally arrive at the conclusion that those reasonings are based on structured sorts, a notion which, in our opinion, is fundamental to clarify the notion of lei (類).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信