{"title":"在瑞士测试iMTA生产力成本调查问卷(iPCQ)在慢性病患者中的使用/ pr<e:1> fung des iMTA生产力成本调查问卷(iPCQ)在瑞士的应用","authors":"T. Friedli, Brigitte Gantschnig","doi":"10.2478/ijhp-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Complex interprofessional programs in health care are dependent on the valid measurement of outcomes. The iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) is one of the few instruments measuring productivity in a comprehensive way which is available in German language. This study explores the validity of the German-language iPCQ with a focus on test content and response processes. The aim of this study is to validate the German version of the iPCQ for the use with people with chronic conditions in Switzerland and to make suggestions for adaptation to the developers. Method This study is a qualitative validation study. We conducted cognitive interviews with people with chronic illnesses and with other experts and analysed them based on the framework method. Results Participants had problems understanding many items and explanations and remembering correct answers. Furthermore, the study revealed construct-related problems in measuring the productivity of people with partial incapacity for work. Conclusions The results show that German version of the questionnaire needs improvement in order to guarantee validity and reliability.","PeriodicalId":91706,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health professions","volume":"1 1","pages":"25 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) for the use with chronic disease patients in Switzerland / Prüfung des iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) für den Einsatz bei Patienten/-innen mit chronischen Krankheiten in der Schweiz\",\"authors\":\"T. Friedli, Brigitte Gantschnig\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ijhp-2022-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Complex interprofessional programs in health care are dependent on the valid measurement of outcomes. The iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) is one of the few instruments measuring productivity in a comprehensive way which is available in German language. This study explores the validity of the German-language iPCQ with a focus on test content and response processes. The aim of this study is to validate the German version of the iPCQ for the use with people with chronic conditions in Switzerland and to make suggestions for adaptation to the developers. Method This study is a qualitative validation study. We conducted cognitive interviews with people with chronic illnesses and with other experts and analysed them based on the framework method. Results Participants had problems understanding many items and explanations and remembering correct answers. Furthermore, the study revealed construct-related problems in measuring the productivity of people with partial incapacity for work. Conclusions The results show that German version of the questionnaire needs improvement in order to guarantee validity and reliability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of health professions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of health professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2022-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing the iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) for the use with chronic disease patients in Switzerland / Prüfung des iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) für den Einsatz bei Patienten/-innen mit chronischen Krankheiten in der Schweiz
Abstract Background Complex interprofessional programs in health care are dependent on the valid measurement of outcomes. The iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) is one of the few instruments measuring productivity in a comprehensive way which is available in German language. This study explores the validity of the German-language iPCQ with a focus on test content and response processes. The aim of this study is to validate the German version of the iPCQ for the use with people with chronic conditions in Switzerland and to make suggestions for adaptation to the developers. Method This study is a qualitative validation study. We conducted cognitive interviews with people with chronic illnesses and with other experts and analysed them based on the framework method. Results Participants had problems understanding many items and explanations and remembering correct answers. Furthermore, the study revealed construct-related problems in measuring the productivity of people with partial incapacity for work. Conclusions The results show that German version of the questionnaire needs improvement in order to guarantee validity and reliability.