CRISPR-Cas基因组编辑在植物中脱靶修饰的发生和性质

M. Sturme, J. P. van der Berg, L. Bouwman, A. de Schrijver, R. D. de Maagd, G. Kleter, Evy Battaglia-de Wilde
{"title":"CRISPR-Cas基因组编辑在植物中脱靶修饰的发生和性质","authors":"M. Sturme, J. P. van der Berg, L. Bouwman, A. de Schrijver, R. D. de Maagd, G. Kleter, Evy Battaglia-de Wilde","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing allows for precise and targeted genetic modification of plants. Nevertheless, unintended off-target edits can arise that might confer risks when present in gene-edited food crops. Through an extensive literature review we gathered information on CRISPR-Cas off-target edits in plants. Most observed off-target changes were small insertions or deletions (1–22 bp) or nucleotide substitutions, and large deletions (>100 bp) were rare. One study detected the insertion of vector-derived DNA sequences, which is important considering the risk assessment of gene-edited plants. Off-target sites had few mismatches (1–3 nt) with the target sequence and were mainly located in protein-coding regions, often in target gene homologues. Off-targets edits were predominantly detected via biased analysis of predicted off-target sites instead of unbiased genome-wide analysis. CRISPR-Cas-edited plants showed lower off-target mutation frequencies than conventionally bred plants. This Review can aid discussions on the relevance of evaluating off-target modifications for risk assessment of CRISPR-Cas-edited plants.","PeriodicalId":7007,"journal":{"name":"ACS Agricultural Science & Technology","volume":"69 1","pages":"192 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants\",\"authors\":\"M. Sturme, J. P. van der Berg, L. Bouwman, A. de Schrijver, R. D. de Maagd, G. Kleter, Evy Battaglia-de Wilde\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing allows for precise and targeted genetic modification of plants. Nevertheless, unintended off-target edits can arise that might confer risks when present in gene-edited food crops. Through an extensive literature review we gathered information on CRISPR-Cas off-target edits in plants. Most observed off-target changes were small insertions or deletions (1–22 bp) or nucleotide substitutions, and large deletions (>100 bp) were rare. One study detected the insertion of vector-derived DNA sequences, which is important considering the risk assessment of gene-edited plants. Off-target sites had few mismatches (1–3 nt) with the target sequence and were mainly located in protein-coding regions, often in target gene homologues. Off-targets edits were predominantly detected via biased analysis of predicted off-target sites instead of unbiased genome-wide analysis. CRISPR-Cas-edited plants showed lower off-target mutation frequencies than conventionally bred plants. This Review can aid discussions on the relevance of evaluating off-target modifications for risk assessment of CRISPR-Cas-edited plants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Agricultural Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"192 - 201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Agricultural Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Agricultural Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.1c00270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

基于crispr - cas的基因组编辑允许对植物进行精确和有针对性的遗传修饰。然而,意外的脱靶编辑可能会出现,当基因编辑的粮食作物出现时,可能会带来风险。通过广泛的文献回顾,我们收集了关于CRISPR-Cas在植物中的脱靶编辑的信息。大多数观察到的脱靶变化是小的插入或缺失(1-22 bp)或核苷酸替换,大缺失(>100 bp)罕见。一项研究检测到载体衍生DNA序列的插入,这对于基因编辑植物的风险评估很重要。脱靶位点与靶序列的错配很少(1-3 nt),主要位于蛋白编码区,通常位于靶基因同源物中。脱靶编辑主要是通过预测脱靶位点的偏倚分析而不是无偏倚全基因组分析来检测的。crispr - cas编辑的植物比传统育种的植物显示出更低的脱靶突变频率。这篇综述可以帮助讨论评估脱靶修饰与crispr - cas编辑植物风险评估的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants
CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing allows for precise and targeted genetic modification of plants. Nevertheless, unintended off-target edits can arise that might confer risks when present in gene-edited food crops. Through an extensive literature review we gathered information on CRISPR-Cas off-target edits in plants. Most observed off-target changes were small insertions or deletions (1–22 bp) or nucleotide substitutions, and large deletions (>100 bp) were rare. One study detected the insertion of vector-derived DNA sequences, which is important considering the risk assessment of gene-edited plants. Off-target sites had few mismatches (1–3 nt) with the target sequence and were mainly located in protein-coding regions, often in target gene homologues. Off-targets edits were predominantly detected via biased analysis of predicted off-target sites instead of unbiased genome-wide analysis. CRISPR-Cas-edited plants showed lower off-target mutation frequencies than conventionally bred plants. This Review can aid discussions on the relevance of evaluating off-target modifications for risk assessment of CRISPR-Cas-edited plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信