律师在加拿大难民确定制度中的作用:一项实证评估

Sean Rehaag
{"title":"律师在加拿大难民确定制度中的作用:一项实证评估","authors":"Sean Rehaag","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the role of counsel in Canada’s refugee determination process through an empirical analysis of the relation between counsel and outcomes in over 70,000 refugee claims decided by the Immigration and Refugee Board from 2005-2009. The article demonstrates that competent counsel is a key factor driving successful outcomes in refugee claims. The article also shows that provincial legal aid programs are increasingly restrictive in funding legal representation for refugee claimants who cannot afford counsel. Taken together, the article argues that the increasing restrictions on legal aid put the lives of refugees at risk. The article also demonstrates that refugee claimants represented by immigration consultants are less likely to succeed than refugee claimants represented by lawyers. As a result, and in light of evidence that the immigration consulting industry has not established adequate procedures to ensure that consultants adhere to standards of professional conduct, the paper contends that immigration consultants should not be authorized to provide unsupervised representation in Canada’s refugee determination system. In short, the paper argues that counsel play an important role in the refugee determination process. Accordingly, measures should be taken to ensure that refugee claimants can access competent counsel, while simultaneously ensuring that unqualified counsel do not play a role in life and death refugee decision-making.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Counsel in Canada's Refugee Determination System: An Empirical Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Sean Rehaag\",\"doi\":\"10.60082/2817-5069.1073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the role of counsel in Canada’s refugee determination process through an empirical analysis of the relation between counsel and outcomes in over 70,000 refugee claims decided by the Immigration and Refugee Board from 2005-2009. The article demonstrates that competent counsel is a key factor driving successful outcomes in refugee claims. The article also shows that provincial legal aid programs are increasingly restrictive in funding legal representation for refugee claimants who cannot afford counsel. Taken together, the article argues that the increasing restrictions on legal aid put the lives of refugees at risk. The article also demonstrates that refugee claimants represented by immigration consultants are less likely to succeed than refugee claimants represented by lawyers. As a result, and in light of evidence that the immigration consulting industry has not established adequate procedures to ensure that consultants adhere to standards of professional conduct, the paper contends that immigration consultants should not be authorized to provide unsupervised representation in Canada’s refugee determination system. In short, the paper argues that counsel play an important role in the refugee determination process. Accordingly, measures should be taken to ensure that refugee claimants can access competent counsel, while simultaneously ensuring that unqualified counsel do not play a role in life and death refugee decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60082/2817-5069.1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

本文通过对2005-2009年移民和难民委员会决定的7万多件难民申请中律师与结果之间关系的实证分析,考察了律师在加拿大难民决定过程中的作用。本文表明,称职的律师是推动难民申请取得成功结果的关键因素。这篇文章还显示,省级法律援助项目在为无力支付律师费用的难民申请人提供法律代理方面越来越受到限制。综上所述,这篇文章认为,对法律援助越来越多的限制使难民的生命处于危险之中。文章还表明,由移民顾问代表的难民申请人比由律师代表的难民申请人更不可能成功。因此,鉴于有证据表明移民咨询行业没有建立适当的程序来确保顾问遵守专业行为标准,该文件认为,不应授权移民顾问在加拿大的难民确定系统中提供无监督的代表。简而言之,本文认为律师在难民确定过程中发挥着重要作用。因此,应采取措施,确保难民申请人能够获得合格的律师,同时确保不合格的律师不会在生死攸关的难民决策中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Counsel in Canada's Refugee Determination System: An Empirical Assessment
This article examines the role of counsel in Canada’s refugee determination process through an empirical analysis of the relation between counsel and outcomes in over 70,000 refugee claims decided by the Immigration and Refugee Board from 2005-2009. The article demonstrates that competent counsel is a key factor driving successful outcomes in refugee claims. The article also shows that provincial legal aid programs are increasingly restrictive in funding legal representation for refugee claimants who cannot afford counsel. Taken together, the article argues that the increasing restrictions on legal aid put the lives of refugees at risk. The article also demonstrates that refugee claimants represented by immigration consultants are less likely to succeed than refugee claimants represented by lawyers. As a result, and in light of evidence that the immigration consulting industry has not established adequate procedures to ensure that consultants adhere to standards of professional conduct, the paper contends that immigration consultants should not be authorized to provide unsupervised representation in Canada’s refugee determination system. In short, the paper argues that counsel play an important role in the refugee determination process. Accordingly, measures should be taken to ensure that refugee claimants can access competent counsel, while simultaneously ensuring that unqualified counsel do not play a role in life and death refugee decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信