使用循证干预措施解决结直肠癌筛查中的差异。

Q1 Medicine
D. Joseph, D. Redwood, A. Degroff, Emily L Butler
{"title":"使用循证干预措施解决结直肠癌筛查中的差异。","authors":"D. Joseph, D. Redwood, A. Degroff, Emily L Butler","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers that affect both men and women. Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness, CRC screening tests are underused. Racial/ethnic minority groups, persons without insurance, those with lower educational attainment, and those with lower household income levels have lower rates of CRC screening. Since 2009, CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) has supported state health departments and tribal organizations in implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase use of CRC screening tests among their populations. This report highlights the successful implementation of EBIs to address disparities by two CRCCP grantees: the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and Washington State's Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program (BCCHP). ANTHC partnered with regional tribal health organizations in the Alaska Tribal Health System to implement provider and client reminders and use patient navigators to increase CRC screening rates among Alaska Native populations. BCCHP identified patient care coordinators in each clinic who coordinated staff training on CRC screening and integrated client and provider reminder systems. In both the Alaska and Washington programs, instituting provider reminder systems, client reminder systems, or both was facilitated by use of electronic health record systems. Using multicomponent interventions in a single clinical site or facility can support more organized screening programs and potentially result in greater increases in screening rates than relying on a single strategy. Organized screening systems have an explicit policy for screening, a defined target population, a team responsible for implementation of the screening program, and a quality assurance structure. Although CRC screening rates in the United States have increased steadily over the past decade, this increase has not been seen equally across all populations. Increasing the use of EBIs, such as those described in this report, in health care clinics and systems that serve populations with lower CRC screening rates could substantially increase CRC screening rates.","PeriodicalId":37858,"journal":{"name":"MMWR supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.\",\"authors\":\"D. Joseph, D. Redwood, A. Degroff, Emily L Butler\",\"doi\":\"10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers that affect both men and women. Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness, CRC screening tests are underused. Racial/ethnic minority groups, persons without insurance, those with lower educational attainment, and those with lower household income levels have lower rates of CRC screening. Since 2009, CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) has supported state health departments and tribal organizations in implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase use of CRC screening tests among their populations. This report highlights the successful implementation of EBIs to address disparities by two CRCCP grantees: the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and Washington State's Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program (BCCHP). ANTHC partnered with regional tribal health organizations in the Alaska Tribal Health System to implement provider and client reminders and use patient navigators to increase CRC screening rates among Alaska Native populations. BCCHP identified patient care coordinators in each clinic who coordinated staff training on CRC screening and integrated client and provider reminder systems. In both the Alaska and Washington programs, instituting provider reminder systems, client reminder systems, or both was facilitated by use of electronic health record systems. Using multicomponent interventions in a single clinical site or facility can support more organized screening programs and potentially result in greater increases in screening rates than relying on a single strategy. Organized screening systems have an explicit policy for screening, a defined target population, a team responsible for implementation of the screening program, and a quality assurance structure. Although CRC screening rates in the United States have increased steadily over the past decade, this increase has not been seen equally across all populations. Increasing the use of EBIs, such as those described in this report, in health care clinics and systems that serve populations with lower CRC screening rates could substantially increase CRC screening rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MMWR supplements\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MMWR supplements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MMWR supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)是影响男性和女性的癌症中导致癌症死亡的第二大原因。尽管有强有力的证据表明其有效性,但CRC筛查试验未得到充分利用。种族/少数民族群体、没有保险的人、受教育程度较低的人和家庭收入水平较低的人CRC筛查率较低。自2009年以来,美国疾病控制与预防中心的结直肠癌控制项目(CRCCP)一直支持州卫生部门和部落组织实施循证干预措施(ebi),以增加在其人群中使用结直肠癌筛查测试。本报告重点介绍了两个CRCCP受助机构(阿拉斯加土著部落健康联盟(ANTHC)和华盛顿州乳腺、宫颈和结肠健康项目(BCCHP))成功实施ebi以解决差异的情况。ANTHC与阿拉斯加部落卫生系统中的地区部落卫生组织合作,实施提供者和客户提醒,并使用患者导航器来提高阿拉斯加土著人口的CRC筛查率。BCCHP在每个诊所确定了患者护理协调员,他们负责协调工作人员在结直肠癌筛查方面的培训,并整合了客户和提供者提醒系统。在阿拉斯加州和华盛顿州的两个项目中,通过使用电子健康记录系统,建立了提供者提醒系统、客户提醒系统或两者兼而有之。在单个临床站点或设施中使用多组分干预措施可以支持更有组织的筛查计划,并可能比依赖单一策略带来更大的筛查率提高。有组织的筛查系统有明确的筛查政策、明确的目标人群、负责实施筛查计划的团队和质量保证结构。虽然美国的CRC筛查率在过去十年中稳步上升,但这种增长并不是在所有人群中都能看到。在为结直肠癌筛查率较低的人群服务的卫生保健诊所和系统中增加ebi的使用,例如本报告中描述的那些,可以大大提高结直肠癌筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death among cancers that affect both men and women. Despite strong evidence of their effectiveness, CRC screening tests are underused. Racial/ethnic minority groups, persons without insurance, those with lower educational attainment, and those with lower household income levels have lower rates of CRC screening. Since 2009, CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) has supported state health departments and tribal organizations in implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to increase use of CRC screening tests among their populations. This report highlights the successful implementation of EBIs to address disparities by two CRCCP grantees: the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) and Washington State's Breast, Cervical, and Colon Health Program (BCCHP). ANTHC partnered with regional tribal health organizations in the Alaska Tribal Health System to implement provider and client reminders and use patient navigators to increase CRC screening rates among Alaska Native populations. BCCHP identified patient care coordinators in each clinic who coordinated staff training on CRC screening and integrated client and provider reminder systems. In both the Alaska and Washington programs, instituting provider reminder systems, client reminder systems, or both was facilitated by use of electronic health record systems. Using multicomponent interventions in a single clinical site or facility can support more organized screening programs and potentially result in greater increases in screening rates than relying on a single strategy. Organized screening systems have an explicit policy for screening, a defined target population, a team responsible for implementation of the screening program, and a quality assurance structure. Although CRC screening rates in the United States have increased steadily over the past decade, this increase has not been seen equally across all populations. Increasing the use of EBIs, such as those described in this report, in health care clinics and systems that serve populations with lower CRC screening rates could substantially increase CRC screening rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MMWR supplements
MMWR supplements Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
48.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR ) series is prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Often called “the voice of CDC,” the MMWR series is the agency’s primary vehicle for scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations. MMWR readership predominantly consists of physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists and other scientists, researchers, educators, and laboratorians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信