{"title":"航空运输合同中旅客的权利。撤回的权利。/旅客在航空运输合同中的权利,撤回的权利。","authors":"Manuel Guillermo Sarmiento García","doi":"10.37767/2362-5325(2021)006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"La opinión de un sector de la doctrina colombiana considera el derecho de retracto consagrado en el estatuto del consumidor, como un ejercicio abusivo del derecho, posición que el autor no comparte, ya que el derecho de retracto, si bien se trata de una terminación unilateral, sus causas están claramente establecidas en la ley, la que ha establecido que, respecto de ciertos contratos, donde la posición del consumidor resulta débil, debe protegerse su autonomía privada, con la posibilidad de retractarse de su compromiso,cuando evalúa con más calma y prudencia las obligaciones que asumió, por eso la ley no ha establecido el derecho de retracto para todo tipo de contratos, sino sólo para aquellos donde la libertad contractual del consumidor está más restringida, y lo puede llevar a cometer equivocaciones, error que es excusable y que por ningún motivo puede dar lugar a un enriquecimiento sin justa causa por parte de las aerolíneas. \nABSTRACT \nThe opinion of a sector of Colombian doctrine considers the right of withdrawal enshrined in the consumer's statute, as an abusive exercise of the right, a position that the author does not share, since the right of withdrawal, although it is a unilateral termination , its causes are clearly established in the law, which has established that, with respect to certain contracts, where the consumer's position is weak, their private autonomy must be protected, with the possibility of retracting their commitment, when they evaluate more calmly and prudence the obligations assumed, that is why the law has not established the right of withdrawal for all types of contracts, but only for those where the consumer's contractual freedom is more restricted, and can lead him to make mistakes, an error that is excusable and that for no reason can give rise to an enrichment without just cause on the part of the airlines. ","PeriodicalId":34439,"journal":{"name":"Revista Derecho y Salud","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los derechos de los pasajeros en el contrato de transporte aéreo. El derecho de retracto./ The rights of passengers in the contract of air transportation the right of withdrawal.\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Guillermo Sarmiento García\",\"doi\":\"10.37767/2362-5325(2021)006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"La opinión de un sector de la doctrina colombiana considera el derecho de retracto consagrado en el estatuto del consumidor, como un ejercicio abusivo del derecho, posición que el autor no comparte, ya que el derecho de retracto, si bien se trata de una terminación unilateral, sus causas están claramente establecidas en la ley, la que ha establecido que, respecto de ciertos contratos, donde la posición del consumidor resulta débil, debe protegerse su autonomía privada, con la posibilidad de retractarse de su compromiso,cuando evalúa con más calma y prudencia las obligaciones que asumió, por eso la ley no ha establecido el derecho de retracto para todo tipo de contratos, sino sólo para aquellos donde la libertad contractual del consumidor está más restringida, y lo puede llevar a cometer equivocaciones, error que es excusable y que por ningún motivo puede dar lugar a un enriquecimiento sin justa causa por parte de las aerolíneas. \\nABSTRACT \\nThe opinion of a sector of Colombian doctrine considers the right of withdrawal enshrined in the consumer's statute, as an abusive exercise of the right, a position that the author does not share, since the right of withdrawal, although it is a unilateral termination , its causes are clearly established in the law, which has established that, with respect to certain contracts, where the consumer's position is weak, their private autonomy must be protected, with the possibility of retracting their commitment, when they evaluate more calmly and prudence the obligations assumed, that is why the law has not established the right of withdrawal for all types of contracts, but only for those where the consumer's contractual freedom is more restricted, and can lead him to make mistakes, an error that is excusable and that for no reason can give rise to an enrichment without just cause on the part of the airlines. \",\"PeriodicalId\":34439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Derecho y Salud\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Derecho y Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37767/2362-5325(2021)006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Derecho y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37767/2362-5325(2021)006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
哥伦比亚是一个理论的部门的意见认为规约所规定的撤军消费者作为非法执业权利,提交人不认同,因为撤军,虽有权单方面终止,其原因是法律所明确规定,作出了规定,对某些合同,消费者的立场很弱,需要保护的个人自主,和可能性关于背弃承诺,当评估更冷静和谨慎义务承担,这就是为什么法律未确定撤军各种合约的权利,而这只适用于消费者合同自由的地方他最有限,并且可能导致犯错误,错误是难怪以任何理由可使航空公司的浓缩,无正当理由的。ABSTRACT The opinion of a部门of派.认为The right of withdrawal确立in The consumer ' s规约,as an虐待行使of The right, a position提交人并不share The right of withdrawal以来,尽管它是单方面的,及其设立的一再in The law, which has成立,with respect to一定contracts, where The consumer ' s position is弱,其私人autonomy protected,,with the possibility of retracting及其承诺,when they评价more calmly and prudence the义务此处,that is why the law has not成立the right of withdrawal for all types of contracts,但这仅适用于有合同where the consumer ' s freedom is more遂宁市限制,and can lead to make mistakes, an错误that is难怪and that for不reason can给rise to an enrichment without只是造成on the part of the航空公司。
Los derechos de los pasajeros en el contrato de transporte aéreo. El derecho de retracto./ The rights of passengers in the contract of air transportation the right of withdrawal.
La opinión de un sector de la doctrina colombiana considera el derecho de retracto consagrado en el estatuto del consumidor, como un ejercicio abusivo del derecho, posición que el autor no comparte, ya que el derecho de retracto, si bien se trata de una terminación unilateral, sus causas están claramente establecidas en la ley, la que ha establecido que, respecto de ciertos contratos, donde la posición del consumidor resulta débil, debe protegerse su autonomía privada, con la posibilidad de retractarse de su compromiso,cuando evalúa con más calma y prudencia las obligaciones que asumió, por eso la ley no ha establecido el derecho de retracto para todo tipo de contratos, sino sólo para aquellos donde la libertad contractual del consumidor está más restringida, y lo puede llevar a cometer equivocaciones, error que es excusable y que por ningún motivo puede dar lugar a un enriquecimiento sin justa causa por parte de las aerolíneas.
ABSTRACT
The opinion of a sector of Colombian doctrine considers the right of withdrawal enshrined in the consumer's statute, as an abusive exercise of the right, a position that the author does not share, since the right of withdrawal, although it is a unilateral termination , its causes are clearly established in the law, which has established that, with respect to certain contracts, where the consumer's position is weak, their private autonomy must be protected, with the possibility of retracting their commitment, when they evaluate more calmly and prudence the obligations assumed, that is why the law has not established the right of withdrawal for all types of contracts, but only for those where the consumer's contractual freedom is more restricted, and can lead him to make mistakes, an error that is excusable and that for no reason can give rise to an enrichment without just cause on the part of the airlines.