小儿桡骨远端干骺端骨折的预后

Tlou Boshomane, D. Simmons, A. Robertson
{"title":"小儿桡骨远端干骺端骨折的预后","authors":"Tlou Boshomane, D. Simmons, A. Robertson","doi":"10.18772/26180197.2022.v4n1a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Manipulation and cast immobilisation is the accepted gold standard for management of distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children, with the use of Kirschner wires (K-wires) in cases with potential instability. The primary aim of this study was to determine the outcome of these fractures treated with our current management protocol. We also sought to identify possible risk factors for redisplacement.\nMethods: A retrospective study was conducted on 61 children with displaced distal radius metaphyseal fractures under the age of 16 years. Fifty-three patients were treated with manipulation and casting only, while eight patients had K-wire fixation. The primary outcome measured was redisplacement during follow-up. Initial complete displacement, an associated ulna fracture, the quality of reduction, cast and padding indices were assessed as possible risk factors for redisplacement.\nResults: A redisplacement rate of 18.8% was reported. We found a statistically significant association between redisplacement and non-anatomical reduction (P = 0.001), cast index (P = 0.030) and padding index (P = 0.031). Non-anatomical reduction resulted in 23.6 times more likelihood of redisplacement (P = 0.008) compared to anatomical reduction. Complete displacement and the presence of an ulna fracture had no effect on redisplacement.\nConclusions: Our current treatment protocol is safe and effective based on the redisplacement rate of 18.8% which is marginally lower than current standards reported in the literature. Poor casting technique and non-anatomical reduction were found to be significant predictors of redisplacement. We suggest that K-wires be used if anatomical reduction is not achieved in older children with limited remodelling capacity.","PeriodicalId":75326,"journal":{"name":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Paediatric Distal Radius Metaphyseal Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Tlou Boshomane, D. Simmons, A. Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.18772/26180197.2022.v4n1a2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Manipulation and cast immobilisation is the accepted gold standard for management of distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children, with the use of Kirschner wires (K-wires) in cases with potential instability. The primary aim of this study was to determine the outcome of these fractures treated with our current management protocol. We also sought to identify possible risk factors for redisplacement.\\nMethods: A retrospective study was conducted on 61 children with displaced distal radius metaphyseal fractures under the age of 16 years. Fifty-three patients were treated with manipulation and casting only, while eight patients had K-wire fixation. The primary outcome measured was redisplacement during follow-up. Initial complete displacement, an associated ulna fracture, the quality of reduction, cast and padding indices were assessed as possible risk factors for redisplacement.\\nResults: A redisplacement rate of 18.8% was reported. We found a statistically significant association between redisplacement and non-anatomical reduction (P = 0.001), cast index (P = 0.030) and padding index (P = 0.031). Non-anatomical reduction resulted in 23.6 times more likelihood of redisplacement (P = 0.008) compared to anatomical reduction. Complete displacement and the presence of an ulna fracture had no effect on redisplacement.\\nConclusions: Our current treatment protocol is safe and effective based on the redisplacement rate of 18.8% which is marginally lower than current standards reported in the literature. Poor casting technique and non-anatomical reduction were found to be significant predictors of redisplacement. We suggest that K-wires be used if anatomical reduction is not achieved in older children with limited remodelling capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wits journal of clinical medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wits journal of clinical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2022.v4n1a2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2022.v4n1a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手法和石膏固定是治疗儿童桡骨远端干骺端骨折公认的金标准,在有潜在不稳定的病例中使用克氏针(k -钢丝)。本研究的主要目的是确定采用我们目前的治疗方案治疗这些骨折的结果。我们还试图确定可能的重新安置的危险因素。方法:对61例16岁以下儿童桡骨远端干骺端移位骨折进行回顾性研究。53例患者仅采用手法和铸造,8例采用k线固定。随访期间测量的主要结局是复位。评估初始完全移位、相关尺骨骨折、复位质量、铸造和填充指标作为可能的再移位危险因素。结果:复位率为18.8%。我们发现复位与非解剖复位(P = 0.001)、铸型指数(P = 0.030)和填充指数(P = 0.031)之间存在统计学上显著的关联。非解剖复位导致再移位的可能性是解剖复位的23.6倍(P = 0.008)。完全移位和尺骨骨折的存在对再移位没有影响。结论:我们目前的治疗方案是安全有效的,其复位率为18.8%,略低于目前文献报道的标准。不良的铸造技术和非解剖复位被发现是再移位的重要预测因素。我们建议,如果重塑能力有限的大龄儿童无法实现解剖复位,则应使用克氏针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Paediatric Distal Radius Metaphyseal Fractures
Background: Manipulation and cast immobilisation is the accepted gold standard for management of distal radius metaphyseal fractures in children, with the use of Kirschner wires (K-wires) in cases with potential instability. The primary aim of this study was to determine the outcome of these fractures treated with our current management protocol. We also sought to identify possible risk factors for redisplacement. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 61 children with displaced distal radius metaphyseal fractures under the age of 16 years. Fifty-three patients were treated with manipulation and casting only, while eight patients had K-wire fixation. The primary outcome measured was redisplacement during follow-up. Initial complete displacement, an associated ulna fracture, the quality of reduction, cast and padding indices were assessed as possible risk factors for redisplacement. Results: A redisplacement rate of 18.8% was reported. We found a statistically significant association between redisplacement and non-anatomical reduction (P = 0.001), cast index (P = 0.030) and padding index (P = 0.031). Non-anatomical reduction resulted in 23.6 times more likelihood of redisplacement (P = 0.008) compared to anatomical reduction. Complete displacement and the presence of an ulna fracture had no effect on redisplacement. Conclusions: Our current treatment protocol is safe and effective based on the redisplacement rate of 18.8% which is marginally lower than current standards reported in the literature. Poor casting technique and non-anatomical reduction were found to be significant predictors of redisplacement. We suggest that K-wires be used if anatomical reduction is not achieved in older children with limited remodelling capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信