{"title":"阅读Empson:复合词的结构","authors":"Marshall Brown","doi":"10.1353/elh.2021.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The difficulties of reading William Empson’s prose are almost universally acknowledged, but the explanations, defenses, or excuses for his wilfulness vary greatly. This essay argues that Empson’s title words “types” and especially “structure” have often misled readers. By scrutinizing key terms in his vocabulary (including structure, bundle, puzzle, and process), the essay concludes that complexity is his goal, rather than, say, pastoral ease. The aim of his writing, throughout his career, is an understanding of the pressures of life in a multi-voiced, democratic society.","PeriodicalId":46490,"journal":{"name":"ELH","volume":"39 1","pages":"743 - 764"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading Empson: The Structure of Complex Words\",\"authors\":\"Marshall Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/elh.2021.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The difficulties of reading William Empson’s prose are almost universally acknowledged, but the explanations, defenses, or excuses for his wilfulness vary greatly. This essay argues that Empson’s title words “types” and especially “structure” have often misled readers. By scrutinizing key terms in his vocabulary (including structure, bundle, puzzle, and process), the essay concludes that complexity is his goal, rather than, say, pastoral ease. The aim of his writing, throughout his career, is an understanding of the pressures of life in a multi-voiced, democratic society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELH\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"743 - 764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2021.0028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2021.0028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The difficulties of reading William Empson’s prose are almost universally acknowledged, but the explanations, defenses, or excuses for his wilfulness vary greatly. This essay argues that Empson’s title words “types” and especially “structure” have often misled readers. By scrutinizing key terms in his vocabulary (including structure, bundle, puzzle, and process), the essay concludes that complexity is his goal, rather than, say, pastoral ease. The aim of his writing, throughout his career, is an understanding of the pressures of life in a multi-voiced, democratic society.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
