联合检测血清IgM和IgG抗体对2019-nCoV感染的诊断价值

Q4 Health Professions
Wan-zhou Xu, Juan Li, Xiaoyun He, Cai-xia Zhang, Si-qing Mei, Congrong Li, Yan Li, Shao-hui Cheng, Pingan Zhang
{"title":"联合检测血清IgM和IgG抗体对2019-nCoV感染的诊断价值","authors":"Wan-zhou Xu, Juan Li, Xiaoyun He, Cai-xia Zhang, Si-qing Mei, Congrong Li, Yan Li, Shao-hui Cheng, Pingan Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G(IgG) antibodies to 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in 2019-nCoV infection. \n \n \nMethod \nThis is a retrospective study. Serum samples were collected from 284 patients including outpatients and inpatients in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 20, 2020 to February 17, 2020. Among them 205 cases were 2019-nCoV infected patients, including 186 cases confirmed with nucleic acid test and 19 cases diagnosed by clinical symptoms and CT characteristics according to \"the New Coronavirus Pneumonia Control Protocol (5th edition)\" . A total of 79 subjects with other diseases but negative to 2019-nCoV infection were recruited as control group. Serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were measured with fully automated immunoassay technology for all subjects. Statistical significance between 2019-nCoV antibodies test and 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test was determined using the χ2 tests. \n \n \nResult \nThe sensitivity of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were 70.24%(144/205) and 96.10%(197/205) respectively and the specificity were 96.20%(76/79) and 92.41%(73/79) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV antibodies were 95.63%(197/206) and 91.03% (71/78) respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test were 100%(186/186) and 80.61%(79/98) respectively. The total coincidence rate of diagnosing 2019-nCoV infection between antibody tests and nucleic acid test for 2019-nCoV were 88.03%(250/284). \n \n \nConclusion \nJoint detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV is an effective screening and diagnostic indicators for 2019-nCoV infection, and an effective complement to the false negative results to nucleic acid test. \n \n \nKey words: \nCoronavirus; Pneumonia, viral; Immunoglobulin M; Immunoglobulin G; Coronavirus infections; Serologic tests","PeriodicalId":10096,"journal":{"name":"中华检验医学杂志","volume":"3 1","pages":"230-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic value of joint detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV in 2019-nCoV infection\",\"authors\":\"Wan-zhou Xu, Juan Li, Xiaoyun He, Cai-xia Zhang, Si-qing Mei, Congrong Li, Yan Li, Shao-hui Cheng, Pingan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G(IgG) antibodies to 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in 2019-nCoV infection. \\n \\n \\nMethod \\nThis is a retrospective study. Serum samples were collected from 284 patients including outpatients and inpatients in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 20, 2020 to February 17, 2020. Among them 205 cases were 2019-nCoV infected patients, including 186 cases confirmed with nucleic acid test and 19 cases diagnosed by clinical symptoms and CT characteristics according to \\\"the New Coronavirus Pneumonia Control Protocol (5th edition)\\\" . A total of 79 subjects with other diseases but negative to 2019-nCoV infection were recruited as control group. Serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were measured with fully automated immunoassay technology for all subjects. Statistical significance between 2019-nCoV antibodies test and 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test was determined using the χ2 tests. \\n \\n \\nResult \\nThe sensitivity of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were 70.24%(144/205) and 96.10%(197/205) respectively and the specificity were 96.20%(76/79) and 92.41%(73/79) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV antibodies were 95.63%(197/206) and 91.03% (71/78) respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test were 100%(186/186) and 80.61%(79/98) respectively. The total coincidence rate of diagnosing 2019-nCoV infection between antibody tests and nucleic acid test for 2019-nCoV were 88.03%(250/284). \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nJoint detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV is an effective screening and diagnostic indicators for 2019-nCoV infection, and an effective complement to the false negative results to nucleic acid test. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCoronavirus; Pneumonia, viral; Immunoglobulin M; Immunoglobulin G; Coronavirus infections; Serologic tests\",\"PeriodicalId\":10096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华检验医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"230-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华检验医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华检验医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1009-9158.2020.03.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

目的探讨2019新型冠状病毒(2019- ncov)免疫球蛋白M (IgM)和免疫球蛋白G(IgG)抗体对2019- ncov感染的诊断价值。方法回顾性研究。采集2020年1月20日至2月17日武汉大学人民医院门诊和住院患者284例血清样本。其中,新型冠状病毒感染患者205例,其中核酸检测确诊186例,根据《新型冠状病毒肺炎控制方案(第5版)》临床症状及CT特征诊断19例。. 招募其他疾病但新型冠状病毒感染阴性的79名受试者作为对照组。采用全自动免疫分析技术检测所有受试者血清新型冠状病毒IgM和IgG抗体。采用χ2检验,分析新型冠状病毒抗体检测与核酸检测的差异有统计学意义。结果血清IgM和IgG抗体对2019-nCoV的敏感性分别为70.24%(144/205)和96.10%(197/205),特异性分别为96.20%(76/79)和92.41%(73/79)。2019-nCoV抗体阳性和阴性预测值分别为95.63%(197/206)和91.03% (71/78),2019-nCoV核酸检测阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%(186/186)和80.61%(79/98)。抗体检测与核酸检测诊断2019-nCoV感染的总符合率为88.03%(250/284)。结论联合检测血清IgM和IgG抗体是筛查和诊断新型冠状病毒感染的有效指标,是对核酸检测假阴性结果的有效补充。关键词:冠状病毒;病毒性肺炎;免疫球蛋白M;免疫球蛋白G;冠状病毒感染;血清学测试
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic value of joint detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV in 2019-nCoV infection
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G(IgG) antibodies to 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in 2019-nCoV infection. Method This is a retrospective study. Serum samples were collected from 284 patients including outpatients and inpatients in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 20, 2020 to February 17, 2020. Among them 205 cases were 2019-nCoV infected patients, including 186 cases confirmed with nucleic acid test and 19 cases diagnosed by clinical symptoms and CT characteristics according to "the New Coronavirus Pneumonia Control Protocol (5th edition)" . A total of 79 subjects with other diseases but negative to 2019-nCoV infection were recruited as control group. Serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were measured with fully automated immunoassay technology for all subjects. Statistical significance between 2019-nCoV antibodies test and 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test was determined using the χ2 tests. Result The sensitivity of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV were 70.24%(144/205) and 96.10%(197/205) respectively and the specificity were 96.20%(76/79) and 92.41%(73/79) respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV antibodies were 95.63%(197/206) and 91.03% (71/78) respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values of 2019-nCoV nucleic acid test were 100%(186/186) and 80.61%(79/98) respectively. The total coincidence rate of diagnosing 2019-nCoV infection between antibody tests and nucleic acid test for 2019-nCoV were 88.03%(250/284). Conclusion Joint detection of serum IgM and IgG antibodies to 2019-nCoV is an effective screening and diagnostic indicators for 2019-nCoV infection, and an effective complement to the false negative results to nucleic acid test. Key words: Coronavirus; Pneumonia, viral; Immunoglobulin M; Immunoglobulin G; Coronavirus infections; Serologic tests
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华检验医学杂志
中华检验医学杂志 Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8037
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信