{"title":"没有风险的卡特里娜计划:新奥尔良和卡特里娜后的重建","authors":"Anne Dölemeyer","doi":"10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2011.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with ‘planning’ and ‘prevention’ as two logics or rationalities of recovery planning. A brief case study on recovery planning in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina has shown how, in a situation of destruction, disorientation and uncertainty, recovery planning was intended to create the impression of a reliable framing for individual decision making on return and reconstruction. Here, planning appeared as pro-active design, with flood prevention as a necessary and centrally assessable element. However, in the course of time and within a number of successive planning processes, it was precisely the attempt to model New Orleans’ future on a centralized, expertise-driven approach of reconstruction that provoked strong criticism. Consequently, dynamics shifted from expertise-centered recovery planning to a more de-centralized mode that stressed citizen participation, ‘lay knowledge’ and inclusion, re-defined what New Orleans should look like in the future, as well as the role and the meaning of ‘(flood) prevention’.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planen ohne Risiko: New Orleans und der Wiederaufbau nach Katrina Planning Without Risk: New Orleans and the Reconstruction after Katrina\",\"authors\":\"Anne Dölemeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2011.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with ‘planning’ and ‘prevention’ as two logics or rationalities of recovery planning. A brief case study on recovery planning in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina has shown how, in a situation of destruction, disorientation and uncertainty, recovery planning was intended to create the impression of a reliable framing for individual decision making on return and reconstruction. Here, planning appeared as pro-active design, with flood prevention as a necessary and centrally assessable element. However, in the course of time and within a number of successive planning processes, it was precisely the attempt to model New Orleans’ future on a centralized, expertise-driven approach of reconstruction that provoked strong criticism. Consequently, dynamics shifted from expertise-centered recovery planning to a more de-centralized mode that stressed citizen participation, ‘lay knowledge’ and inclusion, re-defined what New Orleans should look like in the future, as well as the role and the meaning of ‘(flood) prevention’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2011.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/BEHEMOTH.2011.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Planen ohne Risiko: New Orleans und der Wiederaufbau nach Katrina Planning Without Risk: New Orleans and the Reconstruction after Katrina
This paper deals with ‘planning’ and ‘prevention’ as two logics or rationalities of recovery planning. A brief case study on recovery planning in New Orleans in the aftermath of hurricane Katrina has shown how, in a situation of destruction, disorientation and uncertainty, recovery planning was intended to create the impression of a reliable framing for individual decision making on return and reconstruction. Here, planning appeared as pro-active design, with flood prevention as a necessary and centrally assessable element. However, in the course of time and within a number of successive planning processes, it was precisely the attempt to model New Orleans’ future on a centralized, expertise-driven approach of reconstruction that provoked strong criticism. Consequently, dynamics shifted from expertise-centered recovery planning to a more de-centralized mode that stressed citizen participation, ‘lay knowledge’ and inclusion, re-defined what New Orleans should look like in the future, as well as the role and the meaning of ‘(flood) prevention’.