股票和债券市场何时以及为什么预测经济增长?

D. McMillan
{"title":"股票和债券市场何时以及为什么预测经济增长?","authors":"D. McMillan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3474420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider whether key financial variables predict macroeconomic series and if any predictive power for output growth is also seen in consumption or investment growth. Such information will allow the use of financial markets as a leading indicator for macroeconomic performance. Full sample results suggest that aggregate stock returns and the 10-year minus 3-month term structure exhibit a positive and significant predictive effect on subsequent output, consumption and investment growth. Additionally, the change in the 3-month Treasury bill has predictive power for output and investment growth. Sub-sample analysis reveals that while the term structure exhibits relatively constant predictive power that arising from stock returns largely only occurs during the great moderation period, whereas for the change in the short-term rate it largely arises in the period following the financial crisis. Results also reveal similarity in the predictive relations for output growth and investment growth but less so for consumption growth. We extend the analysis to include commodity, housing and the corporate bond markets. Full sample results reveal limited additional predictive ability, while the REIT returns do provide positive predictive power for output and investment growth over a one-quarter horizon, with the default return doing likewise at the four-quarter horizon. Notably, sub-sample results reveal a change in the sign of the predictive coefficient around the dotcom bubble and crash period.","PeriodicalId":11495,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When and Why Do Stock and Bond Markets Predict Economic Growth?\",\"authors\":\"D. McMillan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3474420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider whether key financial variables predict macroeconomic series and if any predictive power for output growth is also seen in consumption or investment growth. Such information will allow the use of financial markets as a leading indicator for macroeconomic performance. Full sample results suggest that aggregate stock returns and the 10-year minus 3-month term structure exhibit a positive and significant predictive effect on subsequent output, consumption and investment growth. Additionally, the change in the 3-month Treasury bill has predictive power for output and investment growth. Sub-sample analysis reveals that while the term structure exhibits relatively constant predictive power that arising from stock returns largely only occurs during the great moderation period, whereas for the change in the short-term rate it largely arises in the period following the financial crisis. Results also reveal similarity in the predictive relations for output growth and investment growth but less so for consumption growth. We extend the analysis to include commodity, housing and the corporate bond markets. Full sample results reveal limited additional predictive ability, while the REIT returns do provide positive predictive power for output and investment growth over a one-quarter horizon, with the default return doing likewise at the four-quarter horizon. Notably, sub-sample results reveal a change in the sign of the predictive coefficient around the dotcom bubble and crash period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3474420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们考虑关键的金融变量是否能预测宏观经济序列,以及在消费或投资增长中是否也能看到产出增长的预测能力。这类信息将有助于利用金融市场作为宏观经济表现的主要指标。全样本结果表明,股票总收益和10年减3个月期限结构对后续产出、消费和投资增长具有显著的正向预测作用。此外,3个月期国库券的变化对产出和投资增长具有预测能力。子样本分析表明,期限结构表现出相对稳定的预测能力,股票收益的变化主要发生在大缓和时期,而短期利率的变化主要出现在金融危机之后的时期。结果还表明,产出增长和投资增长的预测关系相似,但消费增长的预测关系不那么相似。我们将分析扩展到商品、住房和公司债券市场。全样本结果显示,额外的预测能力有限,而房地产投资信托基金的回报确实对一个季度的产出和投资增长提供了积极的预测能力,默认回报在四个季度的范围内也有同样的效果。值得注意的是,子样本结果显示,在互联网泡沫和崩溃期间,预测系数的符号发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When and Why Do Stock and Bond Markets Predict Economic Growth?
We consider whether key financial variables predict macroeconomic series and if any predictive power for output growth is also seen in consumption or investment growth. Such information will allow the use of financial markets as a leading indicator for macroeconomic performance. Full sample results suggest that aggregate stock returns and the 10-year minus 3-month term structure exhibit a positive and significant predictive effect on subsequent output, consumption and investment growth. Additionally, the change in the 3-month Treasury bill has predictive power for output and investment growth. Sub-sample analysis reveals that while the term structure exhibits relatively constant predictive power that arising from stock returns largely only occurs during the great moderation period, whereas for the change in the short-term rate it largely arises in the period following the financial crisis. Results also reveal similarity in the predictive relations for output growth and investment growth but less so for consumption growth. We extend the analysis to include commodity, housing and the corporate bond markets. Full sample results reveal limited additional predictive ability, while the REIT returns do provide positive predictive power for output and investment growth over a one-quarter horizon, with the default return doing likewise at the four-quarter horizon. Notably, sub-sample results reveal a change in the sign of the predictive coefficient around the dotcom bubble and crash period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信