Hunik Sri Runing Sawitri, A. Riani, M. Cahyadin, Q. A. I. Novela
{"title":"学生成绩评价中的公正与承诺模式","authors":"Hunik Sri Runing Sawitri, A. Riani, M. Cahyadin, Q. A. I. Novela","doi":"10.9744/JMK.16.2.111-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the importance of justice in students’ performance evaluation which might foster students’ commitment to lecturers, and as a consequence students would perform well. The research was conducted on students from departments of Sebelas Maret University who had undertaken com-petency-based learning; and used stratified sampling. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that students’ commitment to lecturers did not significantly influence students’ performance. Distributive and procedural justice in controlled commitment did not significantly influence students’ performance. On the other hand, procedural and distributive justice significantly influenced students’ com-mitment to lecturers.","PeriodicalId":52593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MODEL OF JUSTICE AND COMMITMENT IN THE EVALUATION OF STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE\",\"authors\":\"Hunik Sri Runing Sawitri, A. Riani, M. Cahyadin, Q. A. I. Novela\",\"doi\":\"10.9744/JMK.16.2.111-120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to examine the importance of justice in students’ performance evaluation which might foster students’ commitment to lecturers, and as a consequence students would perform well. The research was conducted on students from departments of Sebelas Maret University who had undertaken com-petency-based learning; and used stratified sampling. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that students’ commitment to lecturers did not significantly influence students’ performance. Distributive and procedural justice in controlled commitment did not significantly influence students’ performance. On the other hand, procedural and distributive justice significantly influenced students’ com-mitment to lecturers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"111-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9744/JMK.16.2.111-120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/JMK.16.2.111-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE MODEL OF JUSTICE AND COMMITMENT IN THE EVALUATION OF STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE
This study aimed to examine the importance of justice in students’ performance evaluation which might foster students’ commitment to lecturers, and as a consequence students would perform well. The research was conducted on students from departments of Sebelas Maret University who had undertaken com-petency-based learning; and used stratified sampling. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results showed that students’ commitment to lecturers did not significantly influence students’ performance. Distributive and procedural justice in controlled commitment did not significantly influence students’ performance. On the other hand, procedural and distributive justice significantly influenced students’ com-mitment to lecturers.