{"title":"2016年关于劳资关系中残疾人的第8号法律的法律确定性","authors":"Mohamad Adya Laksmana Sudradjat, Faisal Santiago","doi":"10.55324/josr.v2i10.1401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article 1 point 1 of the Law on Persons with Disabilities explains that Persons with Disabilities are any person who experiences physical, intellectual, mental, and/or sensory limitations for a long time in interacting with the environment may experience obstacles and difficulties to participate fully and effectively with other citizens based on equal rights. Based on the description above, the problem is how is the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations? The research method used is normative juridical and empirical juridical. Legal certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in industrial relations based on the results of an interview with Mr. Agung as Director of Human Capital PT. Semen Indonesia Group, it can be concluded that there has never been an industrial relations dispute between employees with disabilities and the Company, and to date, there has never been a layoff from the Company. This is by the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities which requires efforts to regulate law in legislation made by authorized and authoritative parties so that these rules have a juridical aspect that can guarantee certainty that the law functions as a rule that must be obeyed.","PeriodicalId":38172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 Concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Adya Laksmana Sudradjat, Faisal Santiago\",\"doi\":\"10.55324/josr.v2i10.1401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Article 1 point 1 of the Law on Persons with Disabilities explains that Persons with Disabilities are any person who experiences physical, intellectual, mental, and/or sensory limitations for a long time in interacting with the environment may experience obstacles and difficulties to participate fully and effectively with other citizens based on equal rights. Based on the description above, the problem is how is the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations? The research method used is normative juridical and empirical juridical. Legal certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in industrial relations based on the results of an interview with Mr. Agung as Director of Human Capital PT. Semen Indonesia Group, it can be concluded that there has never been an industrial relations dispute between employees with disabilities and the Company, and to date, there has never been a layoff from the Company. This is by the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities which requires efforts to regulate law in legislation made by authorized and authoritative parties so that these rules have a juridical aspect that can guarantee certainty that the law functions as a rule that must be obeyed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Research and Policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Research and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i10.1401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i10.1401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legal Certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 Concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations
Article 1 point 1 of the Law on Persons with Disabilities explains that Persons with Disabilities are any person who experiences physical, intellectual, mental, and/or sensory limitations for a long time in interacting with the environment may experience obstacles and difficulties to participate fully and effectively with other citizens based on equal rights. Based on the description above, the problem is how is the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in Industrial Relations? The research method used is normative juridical and empirical juridical. Legal certainty in Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities in industrial relations based on the results of an interview with Mr. Agung as Director of Human Capital PT. Semen Indonesia Group, it can be concluded that there has never been an industrial relations dispute between employees with disabilities and the Company, and to date, there has never been a layoff from the Company. This is by the legal certainty of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities which requires efforts to regulate law in legislation made by authorized and authoritative parties so that these rules have a juridical aspect that can guarantee certainty that the law functions as a rule that must be obeyed.
期刊介绍:
Welfare states have made well-being one of the main focuses of public policies. Social policies entail, however, complicated, and sometimes almost insurmountable, issues of prioritization, measurement, problem evaluation or strategic and technical decision making concerning aim-setting or finding the most adequate means to ends. Given the pressures to effectiveness it is no wonder that the last several decades have witnessed the imposition of research-based social policies as standard as well as the development of policy-oriented research methodologies. Legitimate social policies are, in this context, more and more dependent on the accurate use of diagnostic methods, of sophisticated program evaluation approaches, of benchmarking and so on. Inspired by this acute interest, our journal aims to host primarily articles based on policy research and methodological approaches of policy topics. Our journal is open to sociologically informed contributions from anthropologists, psychologists, statisticians, economists, historians and political scientists. General theoretical papers are also welcomed if do not deviate from the interests stated above. The editors also welcome reviews of books that are relevant to the topics covered in the journal.