1型或2型糖尿病妇女的妊娠丢失和新生儿死亡

Tim Cundy MD
{"title":"1型或2型糖尿病妇女的妊娠丢失和新生儿死亡","authors":"Tim Cundy MD","doi":"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80036-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to be a significant risk factor for pregnancy loss, either through still-birth or late intrauterine death or as the result of severe congenital malformation. Improved glycemic control and other advances in care substantially reduced the incidence of pregnancy loss in women with type 1 DM in most countries by the 1970s. However, because of a greater prevalence of obesity since the 1980s, the emergence of type 2 DM in pregnancy has become a significant problem. Although more pregnancies now occur in women with type 2 DM than in those with type 1 DM in many locations, relatively little information has been published about pregnancy loss in type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> This article examines the prevalence and causes of pregnancy loss in type 1 and type 2 DM and identifies factors in addition to glycemic control that may influence pregnancy outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A MEDLINE search was conducted for recent literature on pregnancy loss in DM. Series reporting &gt;200 pregnancies in type 1 DM and/or &gt;100 pregnancies in type 2 DM were included.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-four studies were identified (15 in type 1 DM [1997-2007], 19 in type 2 DM [1986-2007]). In type 1 DM, major congenital anomalies now account for ~50% of pregnancy losses, and all-cause perinatal mortality remains higher than in the general population. Several studies have suggested that the perinatal mortality rate is higher in type 2 DM than in type 1 DM. Factors other than glycemic control probably explain this phenomenon: women with type 2 DM typically are older and more obese, and they come from disadvantaged communities—all risk factors for pregnancy loss, particularly late intrauterine death and chorioamnionitis. In some women, type 2 DM may be recognized for the first time during pregnancy; pregnancies in these women carry the same risks of pregnancy loss as those in women with established DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Demographic changes in the prevalence of obesity suggest that the prevalence of type 2 DM in pregnancy will almost certainly increase. Although meticulous glycemic control is undoubtedly important in achieving good pregnancy outcomes, clinicians should be aware of the multiple risk factors faced by women with DM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100678,"journal":{"name":"Insulin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80036-X","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy loss and neonatal death in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus\",\"authors\":\"Tim Cundy MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80036-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to be a significant risk factor for pregnancy loss, either through still-birth or late intrauterine death or as the result of severe congenital malformation. Improved glycemic control and other advances in care substantially reduced the incidence of pregnancy loss in women with type 1 DM in most countries by the 1970s. However, because of a greater prevalence of obesity since the 1980s, the emergence of type 2 DM in pregnancy has become a significant problem. Although more pregnancies now occur in women with type 2 DM than in those with type 1 DM in many locations, relatively little information has been published about pregnancy loss in type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> This article examines the prevalence and causes of pregnancy loss in type 1 and type 2 DM and identifies factors in addition to glycemic control that may influence pregnancy outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> A MEDLINE search was conducted for recent literature on pregnancy loss in DM. Series reporting &gt;200 pregnancies in type 1 DM and/or &gt;100 pregnancies in type 2 DM were included.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Thirty-four studies were identified (15 in type 1 DM [1997-2007], 19 in type 2 DM [1986-2007]). In type 1 DM, major congenital anomalies now account for ~50% of pregnancy losses, and all-cause perinatal mortality remains higher than in the general population. Several studies have suggested that the perinatal mortality rate is higher in type 2 DM than in type 1 DM. Factors other than glycemic control probably explain this phenomenon: women with type 2 DM typically are older and more obese, and they come from disadvantaged communities—all risk factors for pregnancy loss, particularly late intrauterine death and chorioamnionitis. In some women, type 2 DM may be recognized for the first time during pregnancy; pregnancies in these women carry the same risks of pregnancy loss as those in women with established DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Demographic changes in the prevalence of obesity suggest that the prevalence of type 2 DM in pregnancy will almost certainly increase. Although meticulous glycemic control is undoubtedly important in achieving good pregnancy outcomes, clinicians should be aware of the multiple risk factors faced by women with DM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insulin\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 167-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80036-X\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insulin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155708430880036X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insulin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155708430880036X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:糖尿病(DM)被认为是流产的重要危险因素,无论是通过死产或晚期宫内死亡,还是由于严重的先天性畸形。到20世纪70年代,在大多数国家,血糖控制的改善和护理的其他进展大大降低了1型糖尿病妇女的妊娠损失发生率。然而,自20世纪80年代以来,由于肥胖的流行程度越来越高,妊娠期2型糖尿病的出现已成为一个重大问题。尽管在许多地区,2型糖尿病患者的妊娠率高于1型糖尿病患者,但关于2型糖尿病患者妊娠丢失的相关信息却相对较少。目的:本文探讨了1型和2型糖尿病患者妊娠丢失的患病率和原因,并确定除血糖控制外可能影响妊娠结局的因素。方法:MEDLINE检索最近关于糖尿病妊娠丢失的文献。纳入了200例1型糖尿病妊娠和/或100例2型糖尿病妊娠的系列报道。结果:34项研究被确定(15项1型糖尿病[1997-2007],19项2型糖尿病[1986-2007])。在1型糖尿病中,主要先天性异常现在占妊娠损失的50%,全因围产期死亡率仍然高于一般人群。几项研究表明,2型糖尿病的围产期死亡率高于1型糖尿病。除血糖控制外的其他因素可能解释了这一现象:2型糖尿病患者通常年龄较大,更肥胖,并且来自弱势社区,这些都是流产的危险因素,尤其是晚期宫内死亡和绒毛膜羊膜炎。在一些妇女中,2型糖尿病可能在怀孕期间首次被发现;结论:肥胖流行率的人口统计学变化表明,妊娠期2型糖尿病的流行率几乎肯定会增加。虽然严格的血糖控制对于获得良好的妊娠结局无疑是重要的,但临床医生应该意识到糖尿病妇女面临的多重危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnancy loss and neonatal death in women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is known to be a significant risk factor for pregnancy loss, either through still-birth or late intrauterine death or as the result of severe congenital malformation. Improved glycemic control and other advances in care substantially reduced the incidence of pregnancy loss in women with type 1 DM in most countries by the 1970s. However, because of a greater prevalence of obesity since the 1980s, the emergence of type 2 DM in pregnancy has become a significant problem. Although more pregnancies now occur in women with type 2 DM than in those with type 1 DM in many locations, relatively little information has been published about pregnancy loss in type 2 DM.

Objectives: This article examines the prevalence and causes of pregnancy loss in type 1 and type 2 DM and identifies factors in addition to glycemic control that may influence pregnancy outcome.

Methods: A MEDLINE search was conducted for recent literature on pregnancy loss in DM. Series reporting >200 pregnancies in type 1 DM and/or >100 pregnancies in type 2 DM were included.

Results: Thirty-four studies were identified (15 in type 1 DM [1997-2007], 19 in type 2 DM [1986-2007]). In type 1 DM, major congenital anomalies now account for ~50% of pregnancy losses, and all-cause perinatal mortality remains higher than in the general population. Several studies have suggested that the perinatal mortality rate is higher in type 2 DM than in type 1 DM. Factors other than glycemic control probably explain this phenomenon: women with type 2 DM typically are older and more obese, and they come from disadvantaged communities—all risk factors for pregnancy loss, particularly late intrauterine death and chorioamnionitis. In some women, type 2 DM may be recognized for the first time during pregnancy; pregnancies in these women carry the same risks of pregnancy loss as those in women with established DM.

Conclusions: Demographic changes in the prevalence of obesity suggest that the prevalence of type 2 DM in pregnancy will almost certainly increase. Although meticulous glycemic control is undoubtedly important in achieving good pregnancy outcomes, clinicians should be aware of the multiple risk factors faced by women with DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信