寻找全球安全:埃弗雷特·c·多尔曼的《天体政治学》和丹尼尔·杜德尼的《黑暗天空》

Q3 Social Sciences
Alan Mckenna
{"title":"寻找全球安全:埃弗雷特·c·多尔曼的《天体政治学》和丹尼尔·杜德尼的《黑暗天空》","authors":"Alan Mckenna","doi":"10.1080/14777622.2021.1878415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay is a conceptual and historical critique of the astropolitical proposals for global security in Everett C. Dolman’s Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age (2002) and Daniel Deudney’s Dark Skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity (2020). It focuses on the divergent views on space weaponization and world political order presented by the two authors. It reflects on previous critique of their work, examines strengths and weaknesses in their arguments, and highlights their shared common ground. The essay places their debate in a historical context by tracing the origins of the concept of space superiority and the Outer Space Treaty, and considers their ideas in relation to U.S. space policy in the 21st century. The critique concludes that the proposals advanced by both authors are problematic. In response, it suggests a rapprochement in the form of a United Nations Space Agency and Space Guard.","PeriodicalId":35153,"journal":{"name":"Astropolitics","volume":"61 1","pages":"199 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of Global Security: Everett C. Dolman’s Astropolitik and Daniel Deudney’s Dark Skies\",\"authors\":\"Alan Mckenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14777622.2021.1878415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay is a conceptual and historical critique of the astropolitical proposals for global security in Everett C. Dolman’s Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age (2002) and Daniel Deudney’s Dark Skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity (2020). It focuses on the divergent views on space weaponization and world political order presented by the two authors. It reflects on previous critique of their work, examines strengths and weaknesses in their arguments, and highlights their shared common ground. The essay places their debate in a historical context by tracing the origins of the concept of space superiority and the Outer Space Treaty, and considers their ideas in relation to U.S. space policy in the 21st century. The critique concludes that the proposals advanced by both authors are problematic. In response, it suggests a rapprochement in the form of a United Nations Space Agency and Space Guard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astropolitics\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"199 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astropolitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2021.1878415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astropolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2021.1878415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对埃弗雷特·c·多尔曼的《天体政治学:太空时代的古典地缘政治》(2002年)和丹尼尔·杜德尼的《黑暗天空:空间扩张主义、行星地缘政治和人类的终结》(2020年)中关于全球安全的天体政治建议进行了概念和历史批判。重点讨论了两位作者在空间武器化和世界政治秩序问题上的不同观点。它反映了先前对他们工作的批评,检查了他们论点中的优缺点,并突出了他们的共同点。本文通过追溯太空优势概念和《外层空间条约》的起源,将他们的辩论置于历史背景中,并将他们的观点与21世纪美国的太空政策联系起来。这篇评论的结论是,两位作者提出的建议都有问题。作为回应,它建议以联合国航天局和太空警卫队的形式和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Search of Global Security: Everett C. Dolman’s Astropolitik and Daniel Deudney’s Dark Skies
ABSTRACT This essay is a conceptual and historical critique of the astropolitical proposals for global security in Everett C. Dolman’s Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age (2002) and Daniel Deudney’s Dark Skies: Space Expansionism, Planetary Geopolitics, and the Ends of Humanity (2020). It focuses on the divergent views on space weaponization and world political order presented by the two authors. It reflects on previous critique of their work, examines strengths and weaknesses in their arguments, and highlights their shared common ground. The essay places their debate in a historical context by tracing the origins of the concept of space superiority and the Outer Space Treaty, and considers their ideas in relation to U.S. space policy in the 21st century. The critique concludes that the proposals advanced by both authors are problematic. In response, it suggests a rapprochement in the form of a United Nations Space Agency and Space Guard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astropolitics
Astropolitics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics and Policy is a peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal is dedicated to policy relevant and interdisciplinary analysis of civil, commercial, military, and intelligence space activities. Committed to the highest editorial standards, Astropolitics is the international journal of choice for the academic, policy-maker and professional in the space community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信