《皇帝:查理五世的新生活

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
P. Ayris
{"title":"《皇帝:查理五世的新生活","authors":"P. Ayris","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2020.1715549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1561, there was a royal command to dismantle rood lofts. This did not finally happen at Great St Mary’s until 1571 and moreover, between 1561 and 1571, the rood loft appears to have disappeared and re-appeared before finally being taken down. As Professor William Sheils argues, it was the intrusion of national political concerns that may well have disrupted communities’ tendencies towards neighbourliness and co-operation. The traditional view of the Elizabethan church as concerned with puritan opposition underplays what this book emphasizes – the continuing importance of Catholic conservatism and non-conformity. The work Contested Reformations in the University of Cambridge, 1535-1584, is a work which updates the interpretation of Professor H.C. Porter in his Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge (Cambridge: CUP, 1958). The use of archival material in the new work is important, but nonetheless caution needs to be exercised. This work is at pains to emphasize examples of Catholic conservatism in Tudor Cambridge, and it is right to do so. Nonetheless, the picture of a Cambridge which supported Protestant reform should not be forgotten. The conservative ascendancy under Mary can be seen as an example of obedience to the Tudor state. What the book acknowledges is that national developments helped condition local reactions to reforming tendencies. With the accession of the Protestant Elizabeth, a Protestant trajectory could only be confirmed and strengthened, not denied.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"31 3 1","pages":"86 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emperor: A New Life of Charles V\",\"authors\":\"P. Ayris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14622459.2020.1715549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1561, there was a royal command to dismantle rood lofts. This did not finally happen at Great St Mary’s until 1571 and moreover, between 1561 and 1571, the rood loft appears to have disappeared and re-appeared before finally being taken down. As Professor William Sheils argues, it was the intrusion of national political concerns that may well have disrupted communities’ tendencies towards neighbourliness and co-operation. The traditional view of the Elizabethan church as concerned with puritan opposition underplays what this book emphasizes – the continuing importance of Catholic conservatism and non-conformity. The work Contested Reformations in the University of Cambridge, 1535-1584, is a work which updates the interpretation of Professor H.C. Porter in his Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge (Cambridge: CUP, 1958). The use of archival material in the new work is important, but nonetheless caution needs to be exercised. This work is at pains to emphasize examples of Catholic conservatism in Tudor Cambridge, and it is right to do so. Nonetheless, the picture of a Cambridge which supported Protestant reform should not be forgotten. The conservative ascendancy under Mary can be seen as an example of obedience to the Tudor state. What the book acknowledges is that national developments helped condition local reactions to reforming tendencies. With the accession of the Protestant Elizabeth, a Protestant trajectory could only be confirmed and strengthened, not denied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"31 3 1\",\"pages\":\"86 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1715549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2020.1715549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1561年,国王下令拆除教堂。直到1571年,大圣玛丽教堂才出现这种情况,而且,在1561年到1571年之间,教堂阁楼似乎消失了,又重新出现,最后才被拆除。正如威廉•谢尔斯(William shils)教授所言,正是国家政治关切的介入,很可能破坏了社区睦邻与合作的倾向。传统的观点认为伊丽莎白时代的教会与清教的反对有关,这低估了本书所强调的——天主教保守主义和不从众的持续重要性。《剑桥大学有争议的改革,1535-1584》更新了波特教授在《都铎时期剑桥的改革和反应》(Cambridge: CUP, 1958)中的解释。在新工作中使用档案材料很重要,但仍然需要谨慎行事。这本书煞费苦心地强调了都铎时期剑桥天主教保守主义的例子,这样做是正确的。尽管如此,剑桥支持新教改革的图景不应被遗忘。玛丽领导下的保守派统治可以看作是对都铎王朝的服从。这本书承认的是,国家的发展有助于制约地方对改革趋势的反应。随着新教徒伊丽莎白的登基,新教的轨迹只能得到确认和加强,而不是被否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emperor: A New Life of Charles V
1561, there was a royal command to dismantle rood lofts. This did not finally happen at Great St Mary’s until 1571 and moreover, between 1561 and 1571, the rood loft appears to have disappeared and re-appeared before finally being taken down. As Professor William Sheils argues, it was the intrusion of national political concerns that may well have disrupted communities’ tendencies towards neighbourliness and co-operation. The traditional view of the Elizabethan church as concerned with puritan opposition underplays what this book emphasizes – the continuing importance of Catholic conservatism and non-conformity. The work Contested Reformations in the University of Cambridge, 1535-1584, is a work which updates the interpretation of Professor H.C. Porter in his Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge (Cambridge: CUP, 1958). The use of archival material in the new work is important, but nonetheless caution needs to be exercised. This work is at pains to emphasize examples of Catholic conservatism in Tudor Cambridge, and it is right to do so. Nonetheless, the picture of a Cambridge which supported Protestant reform should not be forgotten. The conservative ascendancy under Mary can be seen as an example of obedience to the Tudor state. What the book acknowledges is that national developments helped condition local reactions to reforming tendencies. With the accession of the Protestant Elizabeth, a Protestant trajectory could only be confirmed and strengthened, not denied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信