从三个地点的卫星图像估计地表光合有效辐射的五种不同方法的评估——在英国南部室内软果作物监测中的应用

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Claire Thomas, S. Dorling, William Wandji Nyamsi, L. Wald, S. Rubino, L. Saboret, Mélodie Trolliet, E. Wey
{"title":"从三个地点的卫星图像估计地表光合有效辐射的五种不同方法的评估——在英国南部室内软果作物监测中的应用","authors":"Claire Thomas, S. Dorling, William Wandji Nyamsi, L. Wald, S. Rubino, L. Saboret, Mélodie Trolliet, E. Wey","doi":"10.5194/asr-16-229-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This paper assesses several methods for the retrieval of Photosynthetically\nActive Radiation (PAR) from satellite imagery. The results of five different methods are compared to coincident in-situ measurements collected at three sites in southern UK. PAR retrieval methods are separated into\ntwo distinct groups. The first group comprises three methods that compute\nPAR by multiplying the satellite-retrieved solar broadband irradiance at the surface (SSI) by a constant coefficient. The two methods in the second group are based on more sophisticated modelling of the radiative transfer in the atmosphere involving advanced global aerosol property analyses and\nphysically consistent total column water vapour and ozone produced by the\nCopernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). Both methods compute a\ncloud modification factor from satellite-retrieved SSI. The five methods\nhave been applied to two satellite-retrieved SSI datasets: HelioClim-3\nversion 5 (HC3v5) and CAMS Radiation Service (CAMS-Rad). Except at the\nseashore site, Group 2 methods combined with the cloud extinction from the\nHC3v5 dataset deliver the best results with small biases of −5 to 0 µmol m−2 s−1 (−1 % to 0 % relative to the mean of the measurements), root mean square errors of 130 µmol m−2 s−1 (28 %) and correlation coefficients exceeding 0.945. For all methods, best results are attained with the HC3v5 data set. These results demonstrate that all methods capture the temporal and spatial variability of the PAR irradiation field well, although several methods require a posteriori bias adjustments for reliable results. Combined with such an adjustment, the Udo et Aro method is a good compromise for this geographical area in terms of reliability, tractability and its ability to run in real-time. Overall, the method performing a spectral discretization in cloud-free conditions, combined with the HC3v5 dataset, outperforms other methods and has great potential for supporting an operational system.\n","PeriodicalId":30081,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Science and Research","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of five different methods for the estimation of surface photosynthetically active radiation from satellite imagery at three sites – application to the monitoring of indoor soft fruit crops in southern UK\",\"authors\":\"Claire Thomas, S. Dorling, William Wandji Nyamsi, L. Wald, S. Rubino, L. Saboret, Mélodie Trolliet, E. Wey\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/asr-16-229-2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This paper assesses several methods for the retrieval of Photosynthetically\\nActive Radiation (PAR) from satellite imagery. The results of five different methods are compared to coincident in-situ measurements collected at three sites in southern UK. PAR retrieval methods are separated into\\ntwo distinct groups. The first group comprises three methods that compute\\nPAR by multiplying the satellite-retrieved solar broadband irradiance at the surface (SSI) by a constant coefficient. The two methods in the second group are based on more sophisticated modelling of the radiative transfer in the atmosphere involving advanced global aerosol property analyses and\\nphysically consistent total column water vapour and ozone produced by the\\nCopernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). Both methods compute a\\ncloud modification factor from satellite-retrieved SSI. The five methods\\nhave been applied to two satellite-retrieved SSI datasets: HelioClim-3\\nversion 5 (HC3v5) and CAMS Radiation Service (CAMS-Rad). Except at the\\nseashore site, Group 2 methods combined with the cloud extinction from the\\nHC3v5 dataset deliver the best results with small biases of −5 to 0 µmol m−2 s−1 (−1 % to 0 % relative to the mean of the measurements), root mean square errors of 130 µmol m−2 s−1 (28 %) and correlation coefficients exceeding 0.945. For all methods, best results are attained with the HC3v5 data set. These results demonstrate that all methods capture the temporal and spatial variability of the PAR irradiation field well, although several methods require a posteriori bias adjustments for reliable results. Combined with such an adjustment, the Udo et Aro method is a good compromise for this geographical area in terms of reliability, tractability and its ability to run in real-time. Overall, the method performing a spectral discretization in cloud-free conditions, combined with the HC3v5 dataset, outperforms other methods and has great potential for supporting an operational system.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":30081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Science and Research\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Science and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-16-229-2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-16-229-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文评价了从卫星影像中提取光合有效辐射(PAR)的几种方法。五种不同方法的结果与在英国南部三个地点收集的一致的原位测量结果进行了比较。PAR检索方法分为两个不同的组。第一组包括三种计算par的方法,即将卫星检索到的太阳表面宽带辐照度(SSI)乘以一个常数系数。第二组中的两种方法是基于更复杂的大气辐射传输模型,包括先进的全球气溶胶特性分析和白尼大气监测服务(CAMS)产生的物理一致的总柱水蒸气和臭氧。这两种方法都是根据卫星反演的SSI计算云的改变因子。将这五种方法应用于两个卫星检索的SSI数据集:helioclin -3version 5 (HC3v5)和CAMS Radiation Service (CAMS- rad)。除岸线外,第2组方法结合hc3v5数据集的云消光提供了最佳结果,偏差较小,为- 5至0µmol m - 2 s - 1(相对于测量平均值的- 1%至0%),均方根误差为130µmol m - 2 s - 1(28%),相关系数超过0.945。对于所有方法,使用HC3v5数据集获得最佳结果。这些结果表明,所有方法都能很好地捕捉PAR辐照场的时空变异性,尽管有些方法需要对后验偏差进行调整才能获得可靠的结果。结合这种调整,Udo et Aro方法在可靠性、可追溯性和实时运行能力方面是该地理区域的一个很好的折衷方案。总的来说,在无云条件下进行光谱离散化的方法,结合HC3v5数据集,优于其他方法,并且具有支持操作系统的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of five different methods for the estimation of surface photosynthetically active radiation from satellite imagery at three sites – application to the monitoring of indoor soft fruit crops in southern UK
Abstract. This paper assesses several methods for the retrieval of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) from satellite imagery. The results of five different methods are compared to coincident in-situ measurements collected at three sites in southern UK. PAR retrieval methods are separated into two distinct groups. The first group comprises three methods that compute PAR by multiplying the satellite-retrieved solar broadband irradiance at the surface (SSI) by a constant coefficient. The two methods in the second group are based on more sophisticated modelling of the radiative transfer in the atmosphere involving advanced global aerosol property analyses and physically consistent total column water vapour and ozone produced by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). Both methods compute a cloud modification factor from satellite-retrieved SSI. The five methods have been applied to two satellite-retrieved SSI datasets: HelioClim-3 version 5 (HC3v5) and CAMS Radiation Service (CAMS-Rad). Except at the seashore site, Group 2 methods combined with the cloud extinction from the HC3v5 dataset deliver the best results with small biases of −5 to 0 µmol m−2 s−1 (−1 % to 0 % relative to the mean of the measurements), root mean square errors of 130 µmol m−2 s−1 (28 %) and correlation coefficients exceeding 0.945. For all methods, best results are attained with the HC3v5 data set. These results demonstrate that all methods capture the temporal and spatial variability of the PAR irradiation field well, although several methods require a posteriori bias adjustments for reliable results. Combined with such an adjustment, the Udo et Aro method is a good compromise for this geographical area in terms of reliability, tractability and its ability to run in real-time. Overall, the method performing a spectral discretization in cloud-free conditions, combined with the HC3v5 dataset, outperforms other methods and has great potential for supporting an operational system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Science and Research
Advances in Science and Research Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信