通过跨国比较验证考试成绩的解释:比较日本和德国学生在美国高等教育经济学知识测试中的结果。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Förster, O. Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, S. Brückner, R. Happ, R. Hambleton, W. Walstad, Tadayoshi Asano, Michio Yamaoka
{"title":"通过跨国比较验证考试成绩的解释:比较日本和德国学生在美国高等教育经济学知识测试中的结果。","authors":"M. Förster, O. Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, S. Brückner, R. Happ, R. Hambleton, W. Walstad, Tadayoshi Asano, Michio Yamaoka","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/A000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-national assessment of students’ competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students’ economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students’ Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students’ test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students’ acquisition of ECK while ...","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"19 3 1","pages":"14-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison: Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education.\",\"authors\":\"M. Förster, O. Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, S. Brückner, R. Happ, R. Hambleton, W. Walstad, Tadayoshi Asano, Michio Yamaoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/2151-2604/A000195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cross-national assessment of students’ competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students’ economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students’ Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students’ test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students’ acquisition of ECK while ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"19 3 1\",\"pages\":\"14-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/A000195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/A000195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

在包括经济学在内的许多学科中,对高等教育学生经济能力的跨国评估变得越来越重要,但很少有工具能够满足评估高等教育学生经济能力的心理标准。其中之一是国际上有效的大学经济学理解测试(TUCE),它已经在各国的高等教育系统中得到了成功的应用,但测试结果很少被用于学生经济内容知识(ECK)的国际比较。在这里,我们比较了德国和日本的测试改编的莴苣与参考美国的原始,以确定他们适合比较分析ECK在这些国家之间的高等教育。在批判性地检查了两种测试适应后,我们对德国和日本学生的测试成绩进行了比较分析,并评估了学生习得ECK的潜在差异,而……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison: Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education.
Cross-national assessment of students’ competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students’ economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students’ Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students’ test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students’ acquisition of ECK while ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信