“感受责任”:平衡非政府组织向上问责与向下问责的中介

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Vien Chu, Belinda G. Luke
{"title":"“感受责任”:平衡非政府组织向上问责与向下问责的中介","authors":"Vien Chu, Belinda G. Luke","doi":"10.1108/JAOC-05-2020-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This study investigates how NGO managers balance accountability to donors and beneficiaries, and the role of felt responsibility in this process. Design/methodology/approach - Using concepts of accountability theory, practices of microenterprise development (MED) NGOs are examined in two countries - Bangladesh and Indonesia - through interviews with managers of 20 NGOs and analysis of NGOs’ publicly available data. Findings - Findings show a shift in emphasis from a vertical view (upward to donors and downward to beneficiaries) to a horizontal view of NGO accountability. Under this view, a selective approach to donors whose mission and approaches to poverty alleviation aligned with those of the NGOs played an essential role in supporting NGOs’ internal accountability. Further, felt responsibility to beneficiaries is identified as an important mediator balancing both upward and downward accountability. While accountability to donors and beneficiaries was interrelated, accountability to donors was considered a short-term objective and accountability to beneficiaries was considered a long-term and overriding objective. Originality/value - Findings contribute a further understanding of the role of felt responsibility to beneficiaries as a mediator for balancing upward and downward accountability based on the perspectives of NGO managers. Reframing accountability through a horizontal view helps to balance multiple directions of NGO accountability: to self, donors, and beneficiaries. Key words Downward accountability, felt responsibility, microenterprise, NGOs, upward accountability","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Felt responsibility”: a mediator for balancing NGOs’ upward and downward accountability\",\"authors\":\"Vien Chu, Belinda G. Luke\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JAOC-05-2020-0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose - This study investigates how NGO managers balance accountability to donors and beneficiaries, and the role of felt responsibility in this process. Design/methodology/approach - Using concepts of accountability theory, practices of microenterprise development (MED) NGOs are examined in two countries - Bangladesh and Indonesia - through interviews with managers of 20 NGOs and analysis of NGOs’ publicly available data. Findings - Findings show a shift in emphasis from a vertical view (upward to donors and downward to beneficiaries) to a horizontal view of NGO accountability. Under this view, a selective approach to donors whose mission and approaches to poverty alleviation aligned with those of the NGOs played an essential role in supporting NGOs’ internal accountability. Further, felt responsibility to beneficiaries is identified as an important mediator balancing both upward and downward accountability. While accountability to donors and beneficiaries was interrelated, accountability to donors was considered a short-term objective and accountability to beneficiaries was considered a long-term and overriding objective. Originality/value - Findings contribute a further understanding of the role of felt responsibility to beneficiaries as a mediator for balancing upward and downward accountability based on the perspectives of NGO managers. Reframing accountability through a horizontal view helps to balance multiple directions of NGO accountability: to self, donors, and beneficiaries. Key words Downward accountability, felt responsibility, microenterprise, NGOs, upward accountability\",\"PeriodicalId\":46141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2020-0057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2020-0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的-本研究探讨非政府组织管理者如何平衡对捐助者和受益人的责任,以及在这一过程中感觉责任的作用。设计/方法/方法-利用问责理论的概念,通过对20个非政府组织经理的访谈和对非政府组织公开数据的分析,在孟加拉国和印度尼西亚两个国家对微型企业发展(MED)非政府组织的实践进行了研究。调查结果-调查结果显示,非政府组织问责制的重点从纵向视角(向上到捐助者,向下到受益者)转变为横向视角。在这种观点下,对那些使命和扶贫方法与非政府组织一致的捐助者采取选择性办法,在支持非政府组织的内部问责制方面发挥了重要作用。此外,对受益人的感觉责任被确定为平衡向上和向下责任的重要调解人。虽然对捐助者和受益人负责是相互关联的,但对捐助者负责被认为是一个短期目标,而对受益人负责被认为是一个长期和压倒一切的目标。原创性/价值-研究结果有助于进一步理解感受责任对受益人的作用,即根据非政府组织管理者的观点,作为平衡向上和向下问责制的中介。以横向视角重构问责有助于平衡非政府组织问责的多个方向:对自身、对捐助者和对受益者。关键词:向下问责,感受责任,微型企业,非政府组织,向上问责
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Felt responsibility”: a mediator for balancing NGOs’ upward and downward accountability
Purpose - This study investigates how NGO managers balance accountability to donors and beneficiaries, and the role of felt responsibility in this process. Design/methodology/approach - Using concepts of accountability theory, practices of microenterprise development (MED) NGOs are examined in two countries - Bangladesh and Indonesia - through interviews with managers of 20 NGOs and analysis of NGOs’ publicly available data. Findings - Findings show a shift in emphasis from a vertical view (upward to donors and downward to beneficiaries) to a horizontal view of NGO accountability. Under this view, a selective approach to donors whose mission and approaches to poverty alleviation aligned with those of the NGOs played an essential role in supporting NGOs’ internal accountability. Further, felt responsibility to beneficiaries is identified as an important mediator balancing both upward and downward accountability. While accountability to donors and beneficiaries was interrelated, accountability to donors was considered a short-term objective and accountability to beneficiaries was considered a long-term and overriding objective. Originality/value - Findings contribute a further understanding of the role of felt responsibility to beneficiaries as a mediator for balancing upward and downward accountability based on the perspectives of NGO managers. Reframing accountability through a horizontal view helps to balance multiple directions of NGO accountability: to self, donors, and beneficiaries. Key words Downward accountability, felt responsibility, microenterprise, NGOs, upward accountability
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信