关于实际失业保险计划的几点意见

Paola Potestio
{"title":"关于实际失业保险计划的几点意见","authors":"Paola Potestio","doi":"10.4236/me.2023.145037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes and compares the actual unemployment insurance schemes adopted in ten countries and their evolution over the 2001-2020 twenty-year period. The “OECD tax-benefit model” is a precious informative source for the analysis. The comparison between the UI schemes and the rationale that appears to have driven their designs is focused in particular on how the individual schemes tackle the trade-off between insurance and incentives. The main point from this comparison is the identification of two “benefit struc-tures”, which characterize in a deeply different way the actions for countering opportunistic behaviors within the ten countries. The article underlines issues and questions that the factual differences in the UI schemes leave open or con-tribute to raising.","PeriodicalId":32924,"journal":{"name":"Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy Theory and Practice","volume":"186 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Remarks on Actual Unemployment Insurance Schemes\",\"authors\":\"Paola Potestio\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/me.2023.145037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes and compares the actual unemployment insurance schemes adopted in ten countries and their evolution over the 2001-2020 twenty-year period. The “OECD tax-benefit model” is a precious informative source for the analysis. The comparison between the UI schemes and the rationale that appears to have driven their designs is focused in particular on how the individual schemes tackle the trade-off between insurance and incentives. The main point from this comparison is the identification of two “benefit struc-tures”, which characterize in a deeply different way the actions for countering opportunistic behaviors within the ten countries. The article underlines issues and questions that the factual differences in the UI schemes leave open or con-tribute to raising.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"186 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2023.145037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Enterprise in Modern Economy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2023.145037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析比较了2001-2020年20年间10个国家的实际失业保险制度及其演变。“经合组织税收-利益模型”是一个宝贵的信息来源。对UI方案和驱动其设计的基本原理之间的比较,主要集中在个人方案如何处理保险和激励之间的权衡。这一比较的主要观点是确定了两种“利益结构”,这两种结构以截然不同的方式描述了十个国家内打击机会主义行为的行动。文章强调的问题和问题,在实际差异的UI方案留下开放或有助于提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Remarks on Actual Unemployment Insurance Schemes
The article analyzes and compares the actual unemployment insurance schemes adopted in ten countries and their evolution over the 2001-2020 twenty-year period. The “OECD tax-benefit model” is a precious informative source for the analysis. The comparison between the UI schemes and the rationale that appears to have driven their designs is focused in particular on how the individual schemes tackle the trade-off between insurance and incentives. The main point from this comparison is the identification of two “benefit struc-tures”, which characterize in a deeply different way the actions for countering opportunistic behaviors within the ten countries. The article underlines issues and questions that the factual differences in the UI schemes leave open or con-tribute to raising.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信