极值理论中阈值估计的规范检验

IF 0.4 4区 经济学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
L. C. Miranda
{"title":"极值理论中阈值估计的规范检验","authors":"L. C. Miranda","doi":"10.21314/JOP.2014.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fundamental component in the modeling of a financial risk exposure is the estimation of the probability distribution function that best describes the true data-generation process of independent and extreme loss events that fall above a certain threshold. In this paper, we assume that, above the threshold, the extreme loss events are explained by an extreme value distribution. For that purpose, we apply the classical peaks-over-threshold method in extreme-value statistics. According to that approach, data in excess of a certain threshold is asymptotically described by a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). Consequently, establishing a mechanism to estimate this threshold is of major importance. The current methods to estimate the thresholds are based on a subjective inspection of mean excess plots or other statistical measures; the Hill estimator, for example, leads to an undesirable level of subjectivity. In this paper, we propose an innovative mechanism that increases the level of objectivity of threshold selection, departing from a subjective and imprecise eyeballing of charts. The proposed algorithm is based on the properties of the generalized Pareto distribution and considers the choice of threshold to be an important modeling decision that can have significant impact on the model outcomes. The algorithm we introduce here is based on the Hausman specification test to determine the threshold, which maintains proper specification so that the other parameters of the distribution can be estimated without compromising the balance between bias and variance. We apply the test to real risk data so that we can obtain a practical example of the improvements the process will bring. Results show that the Hausman test is a valid mechanism for estimating the GPD threshold and can be seen as a relevant enhancement in the objectivity of the entire process.","PeriodicalId":54030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Operational Risk","volume":"35 1","pages":"23-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specification Test for Threshold Estimation in Extreme Value Theory\",\"authors\":\"L. C. Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JOP.2014.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fundamental component in the modeling of a financial risk exposure is the estimation of the probability distribution function that best describes the true data-generation process of independent and extreme loss events that fall above a certain threshold. In this paper, we assume that, above the threshold, the extreme loss events are explained by an extreme value distribution. For that purpose, we apply the classical peaks-over-threshold method in extreme-value statistics. According to that approach, data in excess of a certain threshold is asymptotically described by a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). Consequently, establishing a mechanism to estimate this threshold is of major importance. The current methods to estimate the thresholds are based on a subjective inspection of mean excess plots or other statistical measures; the Hill estimator, for example, leads to an undesirable level of subjectivity. In this paper, we propose an innovative mechanism that increases the level of objectivity of threshold selection, departing from a subjective and imprecise eyeballing of charts. The proposed algorithm is based on the properties of the generalized Pareto distribution and considers the choice of threshold to be an important modeling decision that can have significant impact on the model outcomes. The algorithm we introduce here is based on the Hausman specification test to determine the threshold, which maintains proper specification so that the other parameters of the distribution can be estimated without compromising the balance between bias and variance. We apply the test to real risk data so that we can obtain a practical example of the improvements the process will bring. Results show that the Hausman test is a valid mechanism for estimating the GPD threshold and can be seen as a relevant enhancement in the objectivity of the entire process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"23-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Operational Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2014.145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Operational Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2014.145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

金融风险暴露建模的一个基本组成部分是对概率分布函数的估计,该函数最好地描述了超过某一阈值的独立和极端损失事件的真实数据生成过程。在本文中,我们假设在阈值以上,极端损失事件可以用极值分布来解释。为此,我们在极值统计中应用经典的峰值超过阈值方法。根据该方法,超过一定阈值的数据用广义帕累托分布(GPD)渐近描述。因此,建立一个机制来估计这个阈值是非常重要的。目前估计阈值的方法是基于对平均超额地块或其他统计措施的主观检查;例如,希尔估计器导致了不受欢迎的主观性水平。在本文中,我们提出了一种创新机制,可以提高阈值选择的客观性,从而摆脱对图表的主观和不精确的关注。该算法基于广义Pareto分布的特性,将阈值的选择作为对模型结果有重要影响的重要建模决策。我们在这里介绍的算法是基于Hausman规格检验来确定阈值的,它保持了适当的规格,以便可以估计分布的其他参数,而不会影响偏差和方差之间的平衡。我们将测试应用于真实的风险数据,以便我们可以获得该过程将带来的改进的实际示例。结果表明,Hausman检验是估计GPD阈值的有效机制,可以看作是整个过程客观性的相关增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Specification Test for Threshold Estimation in Extreme Value Theory
A fundamental component in the modeling of a financial risk exposure is the estimation of the probability distribution function that best describes the true data-generation process of independent and extreme loss events that fall above a certain threshold. In this paper, we assume that, above the threshold, the extreme loss events are explained by an extreme value distribution. For that purpose, we apply the classical peaks-over-threshold method in extreme-value statistics. According to that approach, data in excess of a certain threshold is asymptotically described by a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). Consequently, establishing a mechanism to estimate this threshold is of major importance. The current methods to estimate the thresholds are based on a subjective inspection of mean excess plots or other statistical measures; the Hill estimator, for example, leads to an undesirable level of subjectivity. In this paper, we propose an innovative mechanism that increases the level of objectivity of threshold selection, departing from a subjective and imprecise eyeballing of charts. The proposed algorithm is based on the properties of the generalized Pareto distribution and considers the choice of threshold to be an important modeling decision that can have significant impact on the model outcomes. The algorithm we introduce here is based on the Hausman specification test to determine the threshold, which maintains proper specification so that the other parameters of the distribution can be estimated without compromising the balance between bias and variance. We apply the test to real risk data so that we can obtain a practical example of the improvements the process will bring. Results show that the Hausman test is a valid mechanism for estimating the GPD threshold and can be seen as a relevant enhancement in the objectivity of the entire process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Operational Risk
Journal of Operational Risk BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: In December 2017, the Basel Committee published the final version of its standardized measurement approach (SMA) methodology, which will replace the approaches set out in Basel II (ie, the simpler standardized approaches and advanced measurement approach (AMA) that allowed use of internal models) from January 1, 2022. Independently of the Basel III rules, in order to manage and mitigate risks, they still need to be measurable by anyone. The operational risk industry needs to keep that in mind. While the purpose of the now defunct AMA was to find out the level of regulatory capital to protect a firm against operational risks, we still can – and should – use models to estimate operational risk economic capital. Without these, the task of managing and mitigating capital would be incredibly difficult. These internal models are now unshackled from regulatory requirements and can be optimized for managing the daily risks to which financial institutions are exposed. In addition, operational risk models can and should be used for stress tests and Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR). The Journal of Operational Risk also welcomes papers on nonfinancial risks as well as topics including, but not limited to, the following. The modeling and management of operational risk. Recent advances in techniques used to model operational risk, eg, copulas, correlation, aggregate loss distributions, Bayesian methods and extreme value theory. The pricing and hedging of operational risk and/or any risk transfer techniques. Data modeling external loss data, business control factors and scenario analysis. Models used to aggregate different types of data. Causal models that link key risk indicators and macroeconomic factors to operational losses. Regulatory issues, such as Basel II or any other local regulatory issue. Enterprise risk management. Cyber risk. Big data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信