模拟半导体晶圆测试数据过程模式识别的监督方法比较

Stefan Schrunner, Olivia Bluder, Anja Zernig, Andre Kästner, Roman Kern
{"title":"模拟半导体晶圆测试数据过程模式识别的监督方法比较","authors":"Stefan Schrunner, Olivia Bluder, Anja Zernig, Andre Kästner, Roman Kern","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The semiconductor industry is currently leveraging to exploit machine learning techniques to improve and automate the manufacturing process. An essential step is the wafer test, where each single device is measured electrically, resulting in an image of the wafer. Our work is based on the hypothesis that deviations of production processes can be detected via spatial patterns on these wafermaps. Supervised learning methods are one possibility to recognize such patterns in an automated way - however, the training sample size is very low. In our work, we present and compare several methods for multiclass classification, which can deal with this limitation: multiclass decision trees, as well as decomposition methods like round robin and error-correcting output coding (ECOC). As elementary classifiers, we compare binary decision trees and logistic regression using an elastic net regularization. The evaluation shows that the decomposition methods outperform the multiclass decision tree regarding both, accuracy and practical demands.","PeriodicalId":6533,"journal":{"name":"2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"820-823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Supervised Approaches for Process Pattern Recognition in Analog Semiconductor Wafer Test Data\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Schrunner, Olivia Bluder, Anja Zernig, Andre Kästner, Roman Kern\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The semiconductor industry is currently leveraging to exploit machine learning techniques to improve and automate the manufacturing process. An essential step is the wafer test, where each single device is measured electrically, resulting in an image of the wafer. Our work is based on the hypothesis that deviations of production processes can be detected via spatial patterns on these wafermaps. Supervised learning methods are one possibility to recognize such patterns in an automated way - however, the training sample size is very low. In our work, we present and compare several methods for multiclass classification, which can deal with this limitation: multiclass decision trees, as well as decomposition methods like round robin and error-correcting output coding (ECOC). As elementary classifiers, we compare binary decision trees and logistic regression using an elastic net regularization. The evaluation shows that the decomposition methods outperform the multiclass decision tree regarding both, accuracy and practical demands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"820-823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2018.00131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

半导体行业目前正在利用机器学习技术来改进和自动化制造过程。晶圆测试是一个重要的步骤,其中每个单独的器件都被电测量,从而得到晶圆的图像。我们的工作是基于这样的假设,即生产过程的偏差可以通过这些晶圆图上的空间模式来检测。监督学习方法是一种以自动化方式识别这种模式的可能性,然而,训练样本量非常低。在我们的工作中,我们提出并比较了几种可以处理这种限制的多类分类方法:多类决策树,以及分解方法,如轮循和纠错输出编码(ECOC)。作为基本分类器,我们比较了二叉决策树和逻辑回归使用弹性网络正则化。评价结果表明,该分解方法在精度和实用性方面都优于多类决策树。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Supervised Approaches for Process Pattern Recognition in Analog Semiconductor Wafer Test Data
The semiconductor industry is currently leveraging to exploit machine learning techniques to improve and automate the manufacturing process. An essential step is the wafer test, where each single device is measured electrically, resulting in an image of the wafer. Our work is based on the hypothesis that deviations of production processes can be detected via spatial patterns on these wafermaps. Supervised learning methods are one possibility to recognize such patterns in an automated way - however, the training sample size is very low. In our work, we present and compare several methods for multiclass classification, which can deal with this limitation: multiclass decision trees, as well as decomposition methods like round robin and error-correcting output coding (ECOC). As elementary classifiers, we compare binary decision trees and logistic regression using an elastic net regularization. The evaluation shows that the decomposition methods outperform the multiclass decision tree regarding both, accuracy and practical demands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信