液压胀形试验对AA5754-T4和AA6061-T6应力-应变曲线的实验分析评价

Hugo Campos , Abel D. Santos , Rui Amaral
{"title":"液压胀形试验对AA5754-T4和AA6061-T6应力-应变曲线的实验分析评价","authors":"Hugo Campos ,&nbsp;Abel D. Santos ,&nbsp;Rui Amaral","doi":"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (<em>p</em>), radius of curvature (<em>ρ</em>) and pole thickness (<em>t</em>). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (<em>p, ρ, t</em>) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10198,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and analytical evaluation of the stress-strain curves of AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6 by hydraulic bulge test\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Campos ,&nbsp;Abel D. Santos ,&nbsp;Rui Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (<em>p</em>), radius of curvature (<em>ρ</em>) and pole thickness (<em>t</em>). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (<em>p, ρ, t</em>) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

水力胀形试验可以作为在双轴应力条件下获得较大均匀塑性应变的手段,应用于板料硬化曲线的测定。关于硬化行为的更多信息是开发机械表征系统的原因,该系统通过读取凸起测试变量来确定应力-应变曲线:凸起压力(p),曲率半径(ρ)和极厚(t)。应力-应变曲线的确定可能基于从凸起测试结果(p, ρ, t)中连续获取的数据,或者基于使用与圆顶高度相关的这些变量的解析方程。本文对利用“穹顶高度-极厚”演化分析方法获得应力-应变曲线的不同方法进行了比较研究。结果表明,现有的几种计算方法与实验值相比均不适用,且存在明显的离散性。因此,本文提出并验证了一种更好的分析方法。本研究和相应的材料表征应用于目前汽车工业中使用的两种铝合金AA5754-T4和AA6061-T6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental and analytical evaluation of the stress-strain curves of AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6 by hydraulic bulge test

The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (p), radius of curvature (ρ) and pole thickness (t). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (p, ρ, t) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信