脑卒中中脑自动调节的评估:静息研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析

Kannakorn Intharakham, L. Beishon, R. Panerai, V. Haunton, T. Robinson
{"title":"脑卒中中脑自动调节的评估:静息研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Kannakorn Intharakham, L. Beishon, R. Panerai, V. Haunton, T. Robinson","doi":"10.1177/0271678X19871013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) has been shown to be impaired in cerebrovascular diseases, but there is a lack of consistency across different studies and the different metrics that have been proposed for assessment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses involving assessment of dCA in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Thirty-three articles describing assessment of dCA with transfer function analysis (TFA) were included, with meta-analyses performed for derived parameters of gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI). A total of 1233 patients were pooled from 12 studies on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and two studies on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In comparison with controls, TFA phase of AIS was significantly reduced (nine studies), in both hemispheres (P < 0.0001). TFA gain provided inconsistent results, with reduced values in relation to controls, for both hemispheres. The ARI (six studies) was reduced compared to controls, in both hemispheres (P < 0.005). In ICH, gain showed higher values compared to controls for the unaffected (P = 0.01), but not for the affected hemisphere. Meta-analyses in AIS have demonstrated that phase and the ARI index can show highly significant differences in comparison with healthy controls, while ICH have been limited by the scarcity of studies and the diversity of units adopted for gain.","PeriodicalId":15356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","volume":"144 1","pages":"2105 - 2116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of cerebral autoregulation in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies at rest\",\"authors\":\"Kannakorn Intharakham, L. Beishon, R. Panerai, V. Haunton, T. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0271678X19871013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) has been shown to be impaired in cerebrovascular diseases, but there is a lack of consistency across different studies and the different metrics that have been proposed for assessment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses involving assessment of dCA in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Thirty-three articles describing assessment of dCA with transfer function analysis (TFA) were included, with meta-analyses performed for derived parameters of gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI). A total of 1233 patients were pooled from 12 studies on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and two studies on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In comparison with controls, TFA phase of AIS was significantly reduced (nine studies), in both hemispheres (P < 0.0001). TFA gain provided inconsistent results, with reduced values in relation to controls, for both hemispheres. The ARI (six studies) was reduced compared to controls, in both hemispheres (P < 0.005). In ICH, gain showed higher values compared to controls for the unaffected (P = 0.01), but not for the affected hemisphere. Meta-analyses in AIS have demonstrated that phase and the ARI index can show highly significant differences in comparison with healthy controls, while ICH have been limited by the scarcity of studies and the diversity of units adopted for gain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"2105 - 2116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19871013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X19871013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

动态脑自动调节(dCA)已被证明在脑血管疾病中受损,但不同的研究和不同的评估指标缺乏一致性。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,评估了dCA在缺血性和出血性中风中的作用。纳入了33篇描述用传递函数分析(TFA)评估dCA的文章,并对增益、相位和自动调节指数(ARI)的衍生参数进行了荟萃分析。12项急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)研究和2项脑出血(ICH)研究共纳入1233例患者。与对照组相比,AIS的TFA期明显减少(9项研究),在两个半球(P < 0.0001)。TFA增益提供了不一致的结果,与对照组相比,两个半球的TFA值都降低了。与对照组相比,两脑半球的ARI(6项研究)减少(P < 0.005)。在脑出血中,未受影响的脑半球的增益值比对照组高(P = 0.01),但患病半球的增益值不高。AIS的荟萃分析表明,与健康对照相比,phase和ARI指数可以显示出高度显着的差异,而ICH则受到研究稀缺和为获得而采用的单位多样性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of cerebral autoregulation in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies at rest
Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) has been shown to be impaired in cerebrovascular diseases, but there is a lack of consistency across different studies and the different metrics that have been proposed for assessment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses involving assessment of dCA in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Thirty-three articles describing assessment of dCA with transfer function analysis (TFA) were included, with meta-analyses performed for derived parameters of gain, phase and autoregulation index (ARI). A total of 1233 patients were pooled from 12 studies on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and two studies on intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In comparison with controls, TFA phase of AIS was significantly reduced (nine studies), in both hemispheres (P < 0.0001). TFA gain provided inconsistent results, with reduced values in relation to controls, for both hemispheres. The ARI (six studies) was reduced compared to controls, in both hemispheres (P < 0.005). In ICH, gain showed higher values compared to controls for the unaffected (P = 0.01), but not for the affected hemisphere. Meta-analyses in AIS have demonstrated that phase and the ARI index can show highly significant differences in comparison with healthy controls, while ICH have been limited by the scarcity of studies and the diversity of units adopted for gain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信