在伊斯兰银行债务清偿和延期偿还义务方面,法院作出裁决

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Sahnaz Kartika, Muhammad Yadi Harahap
{"title":"在伊斯兰银行债务清偿和延期偿还义务方面,法院作出裁决","authors":"Sahnaz Kartika, Muhammad Yadi Harahap","doi":"10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Religious Courts are the only legal institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes, based on Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts. This is also supported by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases. However, there are still many sharia business/shariah banking cases in commercial courts where legal submissions are tug-of-war in a dichotomy between the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and submission to the authority of the commercial court within the district court environment. So that there is regulatory disharmony and legal uncertainty regarding jurisdictional decisions in bankruptcy cases of Islamic economic institutions. This research method uses normative research by examining legal materials related to bankruptcy and PKPU. The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to unify and harmonize regulations that specifically regulate the settlement of sharia bankruptcy cases so that there are no jurisdictional conflicts between the Religious Courts and the Commercial Courts. Legal consequences if the bankruptcy case of Islamic banking is still filed at the Commercial Court, there will be coercion of the substance of sharia economic law to become conventional economic law, so that the settlement of the dispute is not in sync with the contract and the concept of settlement of cases which prioritizes business concepts and business continuity rather than fairness and certainty. substantive.","PeriodicalId":31072,"journal":{"name":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kewenangan Mengadili Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Perbankan Syariah\",\"authors\":\"Sahnaz Kartika, Muhammad Yadi Harahap\",\"doi\":\"10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Religious Courts are the only legal institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes, based on Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts. This is also supported by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases. However, there are still many sharia business/shariah banking cases in commercial courts where legal submissions are tug-of-war in a dichotomy between the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and submission to the authority of the commercial court within the district court environment. So that there is regulatory disharmony and legal uncertainty regarding jurisdictional decisions in bankruptcy cases of Islamic economic institutions. This research method uses normative research by examining legal materials related to bankruptcy and PKPU. The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to unify and harmonize regulations that specifically regulate the settlement of sharia bankruptcy cases so that there are no jurisdictional conflicts between the Religious Courts and the Commercial Courts. Legal consequences if the bankruptcy case of Islamic banking is still filed at the Commercial Court, there will be coercion of the substance of sharia economic law to become conventional economic law, so that the settlement of the dispute is not in sync with the contract and the concept of settlement of cases which prioritizes business concepts and business continuity rather than fairness and certainty. substantive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据2006年关于宗教法院的第3号法律,宗教法院是唯一被授权解决伊斯兰经济纠纷的法律机构。这也得到了2016年最高法院关于解决伊斯兰经济案件程序的第14号条例的支持。然而,在商事法庭仍有许多伊斯兰教法商业/伊斯兰教法银行案件,在这些案件中,法律意见书在宗教法庭的绝对权限和在区域法院环境下服从商事法庭的权威之间是一种二分法的拔河。因此,在伊斯兰经济机构破产案件的管辖权决定中存在着监管不协调和法律不确定性。本研究方法采用规范研究的方法,通过查阅破产与PKPU相关的法律资料。研究结果表明,有必要统一和协调专门规范伊斯兰教破产案件解决的规定,以避免宗教法院与商业法院之间的管辖权冲突。如果伊斯兰银行的破产案件仍然在商事法庭提起诉讼,将会有伊斯兰经济法律的实质被强制变为传统经济法律,从而使纠纷的解决与合同和案件解决的概念不同步,优先考虑商业概念和业务连续性而不是公平和确定性。实质性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kewenangan Mengadili Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Perbankan Syariah
The Religious Courts are the only legal institution authorized to resolve sharia economic disputes, based on Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts. This is also supported by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases. However, there are still many sharia business/shariah banking cases in commercial courts where legal submissions are tug-of-war in a dichotomy between the absolute competence of the Religious Courts and submission to the authority of the commercial court within the district court environment. So that there is regulatory disharmony and legal uncertainty regarding jurisdictional decisions in bankruptcy cases of Islamic economic institutions. This research method uses normative research by examining legal materials related to bankruptcy and PKPU. The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to unify and harmonize regulations that specifically regulate the settlement of sharia bankruptcy cases so that there are no jurisdictional conflicts between the Religious Courts and the Commercial Courts. Legal consequences if the bankruptcy case of Islamic banking is still filed at the Commercial Court, there will be coercion of the substance of sharia economic law to become conventional economic law, so that the settlement of the dispute is not in sync with the contract and the concept of settlement of cases which prioritizes business concepts and business continuity rather than fairness and certainty. substantive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum  Pranata Sosial
Al Ihkam Jurnal Hukum Pranata Sosial Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信