艾司洛尔减轻注射异丙酚时的疼痛

F. N. Kaya, B. Yavaşçaoğlu, E. Moğol, R. İşçimen, Berrin Özcan
{"title":"艾司洛尔减轻注射异丙酚时的疼痛","authors":"F. N. Kaya, B. Yavaşçaoğlu, E. Moğol, R. İşçimen, Berrin Özcan","doi":"10.1163/156856906778704704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background and objective: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to determine the effect of esmolol on the incidence and severity of pain during propofol injection using a venous retention technique, and to compare it with lidocaine and placebo. Methods: After institutional ethical approval, 150 ASA I-II patients (ages 21–70) undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were randomized to receive esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50), lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50) or saline (placebo group, n = 50) diluted into a 5 ml solution after tourniquet application (70 mmHg) on the forearm. The occlusion was released after 30 seconds and 25% of the calculated induction dose of propofol was administrated at the rate of 0.5 ml/s. The patients were observed and asked immediately if they had pain in the arm, and the response was recorded. Results: Twenty-seven patients in the esmolol group, 28 in the lidocaine group, and 8 in the placebo group reported no pain (both groups vs. pl...","PeriodicalId":19808,"journal":{"name":"Pain Clinic","volume":"74 1","pages":"361-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Esmolol reduces pain on injection of propofol\",\"authors\":\"F. N. Kaya, B. Yavaşçaoğlu, E. Moğol, R. İşçimen, Berrin Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/156856906778704704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background and objective: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to determine the effect of esmolol on the incidence and severity of pain during propofol injection using a venous retention technique, and to compare it with lidocaine and placebo. Methods: After institutional ethical approval, 150 ASA I-II patients (ages 21–70) undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were randomized to receive esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50), lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50) or saline (placebo group, n = 50) diluted into a 5 ml solution after tourniquet application (70 mmHg) on the forearm. The occlusion was released after 30 seconds and 25% of the calculated induction dose of propofol was administrated at the rate of 0.5 ml/s. The patients were observed and asked immediately if they had pain in the arm, and the response was recorded. Results: Twenty-seven patients in the esmolol group, 28 in the lidocaine group, and 8 in the placebo group reported no pain (both groups vs. pl...\",\"PeriodicalId\":19808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Clinic\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"361-366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/156856906778704704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/156856906778704704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的方法,探讨静脉留置技术下艾司洛尔对异丙酚注射过程中疼痛发生率和严重程度的影响,并与利多卡因和安慰剂进行比较。方法:经机构伦理批准,150例ASA I-II期择期手术全麻患者(年龄21-70岁)随机分为艾斯洛尔(0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50)、利多卡因(0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50)或生理盐水(安慰剂组,n = 50),在前臂止血带(70 mmHg)应用后稀释成5 ml溶液。30秒后解除闭塞,以0.5 ml/s的速率给予计算诱导剂量的25%异丙酚。观察患者,并立即询问他们的手臂是否疼痛,并记录他们的反应。结果:艾司洛尔组27例,利多卡因组28例,安慰剂组8例无疼痛(两组均无疼痛)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Esmolol reduces pain on injection of propofol
Abstract Background and objective: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to determine the effect of esmolol on the incidence and severity of pain during propofol injection using a venous retention technique, and to compare it with lidocaine and placebo. Methods: After institutional ethical approval, 150 ASA I-II patients (ages 21–70) undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery were randomized to receive esmolol (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50), lidocaine (0.5 mg/kg) (n = 50) or saline (placebo group, n = 50) diluted into a 5 ml solution after tourniquet application (70 mmHg) on the forearm. The occlusion was released after 30 seconds and 25% of the calculated induction dose of propofol was administrated at the rate of 0.5 ml/s. The patients were observed and asked immediately if they had pain in the arm, and the response was recorded. Results: Twenty-seven patients in the esmolol group, 28 in the lidocaine group, and 8 in the placebo group reported no pain (both groups vs. pl...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信