他汀类药物使用与非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的关系:来自妇女健康倡议的前瞻性结果

Ange Wang, Jean Y. Tang, M. Stefanick
{"title":"他汀类药物使用与非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的关系:来自妇女健康倡议的前瞻性结果","authors":"Ange Wang, Jean Y. Tang, M. Stefanick","doi":"10.1177/1745505716667958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between the use of statins (3-hydroxy3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) and multiple cancer types has been the focus of many studies. A recent prospective study by Wang et al.1 investigated the relationship between statin use and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the large, prospective Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Although usually not life-threatening, NMSC is the most common cancer in the United States (over 5.4 million cases yearly) and leads to a high economic burden.2 With the high incidence of NMSC and the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines3 which have increased the indications for statin use in the United States, better understanding of the relationship between statin use and NMSC is particularly important. The WHI study found that among a cohort of 118,357 women, use of any statin at baseline was associated with increased NMSC (odds ratio (OR), 1.21, 1.07–1.35). The study also found that the effect was most pronounced for lipophilic statins (OR 1.39, 1.18–1.64), including lovastatin and simvastatin. Statins carry a photosensitivity warning, and prior clinical studies have suggested that statins may be associated with increased NMSC incidence. In the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Heart Protection Study (HPS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), NMSC was found to have a higher incidence in the treatment groups.4,5 A large meta-analysis of RCTs, cohort studies, and case–control studies on statins and all-cancer incidence also found increased NMSC risk among statin users.6 Additionally, two large European studies found increased NMSC or BCC incidence associated with the use of all or particular statin types.7,8 However, some conflicting evidence exists in literature, as other studies including meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported no significant relationship between statin use and NMSC risk,7,9,10 and studies have also suggested decreased NMSC risk associated with statin use.11,12 These conflicting findings are somewhat difficult to put into context, as prospective studies and RCTs investigating this relationship have been limited. In contrast to the findings on skin cancer and statin use, the literature on statin use and other non-cutaneous cancers has mostly reported decreased incidence13–16 or no effect.6,10 Additionally, several studies on cancer mortality and statin use have found protective effects, including a retrospective study of 295,925 cancer patients in Denmark17 and a retrospective study in Finland among 31,114 patients which examined statin use and breast cancer mortality specifically. In contrast, a meta-analysis of RCTs in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration18 database reported no association between statin use and either cancer mortality or incidence. Nonetheless, overall the literature on statin use and noncutaneous cancers is more suggestive of a positive relationship than statin use and NMSC, though reasons for such a difference are unclear. Given these conflicting findings in literature, a future research priority suggested by the Wang et al. research is clarifying the biological mechanisms that may mediate statin use and increased NMSC risk and in particular if the cutaneous effects on statins differ from their non-cutaneous effects. As the use of statins continues to expand under the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and cancer is currently the second leading cause of death in the United States, it is crucial to understand whether or not statins actually affect cancer incidence and progression and if this effect differs depending on the type of cancer. Several biological mechanisms linking statin use and cancer have been proposed, though none are definitive. Both protective and non-protective biological mechanisms have been suggested in relation to statin use and cancer incidence and progression. In terms of protective mechanisms, lower cholesterol levels may block cell proliferation that is essential to cancer progression.19 Statins have also been hypothesized to halt the cell cycle,20 interfere with angiogenesis,21 and affect cell adhesion and inflammation;22 all of these mechanisms may lead to lower cancer risk. Statins are also believed to inhibit the prenylation of G-proteins which may also decrease cancer risk and progression.23 For NMSC specifically, statins may cause apoptosis of keratinocytes through decreasing levels of cholesterol and affecting the RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MEK) pathway.24 Lower cholesterol levels are also hypothesized to inhibit the Hedgehog signaling pathway which is believed to be important for progression of BCC.25 However, in terms of non-protective mechanisms, statins have been implicated in increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and as well as regulatory T cells; these effects Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: Prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative 667958WHE0010.1177/1745505716667958Women’s HealthEditorial editorial2016","PeriodicalId":20389,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"453 - 455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: Prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative\",\"authors\":\"Ange Wang, Jean Y. Tang, M. Stefanick\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1745505716667958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between the use of statins (3-hydroxy3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) and multiple cancer types has been the focus of many studies. A recent prospective study by Wang et al.1 investigated the relationship between statin use and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the large, prospective Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Although usually not life-threatening, NMSC is the most common cancer in the United States (over 5.4 million cases yearly) and leads to a high economic burden.2 With the high incidence of NMSC and the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines3 which have increased the indications for statin use in the United States, better understanding of the relationship between statin use and NMSC is particularly important. The WHI study found that among a cohort of 118,357 women, use of any statin at baseline was associated with increased NMSC (odds ratio (OR), 1.21, 1.07–1.35). The study also found that the effect was most pronounced for lipophilic statins (OR 1.39, 1.18–1.64), including lovastatin and simvastatin. Statins carry a photosensitivity warning, and prior clinical studies have suggested that statins may be associated with increased NMSC incidence. In the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Heart Protection Study (HPS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), NMSC was found to have a higher incidence in the treatment groups.4,5 A large meta-analysis of RCTs, cohort studies, and case–control studies on statins and all-cancer incidence also found increased NMSC risk among statin users.6 Additionally, two large European studies found increased NMSC or BCC incidence associated with the use of all or particular statin types.7,8 However, some conflicting evidence exists in literature, as other studies including meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported no significant relationship between statin use and NMSC risk,7,9,10 and studies have also suggested decreased NMSC risk associated with statin use.11,12 These conflicting findings are somewhat difficult to put into context, as prospective studies and RCTs investigating this relationship have been limited. In contrast to the findings on skin cancer and statin use, the literature on statin use and other non-cutaneous cancers has mostly reported decreased incidence13–16 or no effect.6,10 Additionally, several studies on cancer mortality and statin use have found protective effects, including a retrospective study of 295,925 cancer patients in Denmark17 and a retrospective study in Finland among 31,114 patients which examined statin use and breast cancer mortality specifically. In contrast, a meta-analysis of RCTs in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration18 database reported no association between statin use and either cancer mortality or incidence. Nonetheless, overall the literature on statin use and noncutaneous cancers is more suggestive of a positive relationship than statin use and NMSC, though reasons for such a difference are unclear. Given these conflicting findings in literature, a future research priority suggested by the Wang et al. research is clarifying the biological mechanisms that may mediate statin use and increased NMSC risk and in particular if the cutaneous effects on statins differ from their non-cutaneous effects. As the use of statins continues to expand under the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and cancer is currently the second leading cause of death in the United States, it is crucial to understand whether or not statins actually affect cancer incidence and progression and if this effect differs depending on the type of cancer. Several biological mechanisms linking statin use and cancer have been proposed, though none are definitive. Both protective and non-protective biological mechanisms have been suggested in relation to statin use and cancer incidence and progression. In terms of protective mechanisms, lower cholesterol levels may block cell proliferation that is essential to cancer progression.19 Statins have also been hypothesized to halt the cell cycle,20 interfere with angiogenesis,21 and affect cell adhesion and inflammation;22 all of these mechanisms may lead to lower cancer risk. Statins are also believed to inhibit the prenylation of G-proteins which may also decrease cancer risk and progression.23 For NMSC specifically, statins may cause apoptosis of keratinocytes through decreasing levels of cholesterol and affecting the RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MEK) pathway.24 Lower cholesterol levels are also hypothesized to inhibit the Hedgehog signaling pathway which is believed to be important for progression of BCC.25 However, in terms of non-protective mechanisms, statins have been implicated in increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and as well as regulatory T cells; these effects Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: Prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative 667958WHE0010.1177/1745505716667958Women’s HealthEditorial editorial2016\",\"PeriodicalId\":20389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"453 - 455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505716667958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy and Women’s Health Care International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505716667958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

他汀类药物(3-羟3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A (HMG-CoA)还原酶抑制剂)的使用与多种癌症类型之间的关系已成为许多研究的焦点。Wang等人最近的一项前瞻性研究1在大型前瞻性妇女健康倡议(WHI)中调查了他汀类药物使用与非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)之间的关系。NMSC包括基底细胞癌(BCC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。虽然通常不会危及生命,但NMSC是美国最常见的癌症(每年超过540万例),并导致很高的经济负担随着NMSC的高发病率和2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南增加了他汀类药物在美国的适应症,更好地了解他汀类药物使用与NMSC之间的关系尤为重要。WHI研究发现,在118,357名女性队列中,在基线时使用任何他汀类药物与NMSC增加相关(优势比(OR), 1.21, 1.07-1.35)。该研究还发现,包括洛伐他汀和辛伐他汀在内的亲脂性他汀类药物的效果最为明显(OR为1.39,1.18-1.64)。他汀类药物带有光敏警告,先前的临床研究表明他汀类药物可能与NMSC发病率增加有关。在斯堪的纳维亚辛伐他汀生存研究(4S)和心脏保护研究(HPS)随机对照试验(rct)中,NMSC在治疗组中发病率更高。一项关于他汀类药物和所有癌症发病率的随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究的大型荟萃分析也发现,他汀类药物使用者患NMSC的风险增加此外,两项大型欧洲研究发现,NMSC或BCC发病率的增加与使用所有或特定类型的他汀类药物有关。7,8然而,文献中存在一些相互矛盾的证据,包括随机对照试验(RCTs)的荟萃分析在内的其他研究报道他汀类药物的使用与NMSC风险之间没有显著关系7,9,10,研究也表明他汀类药物的使用与NMSC风险的降低有关。这些相互矛盾的发现在某种程度上很难纳入背景,因为调查这种关系的前瞻性研究和随机对照试验有限。与皮肤癌和他汀类药物使用的研究结果相反,他汀类药物使用和其他非皮肤癌的文献大多报道发病率降低或无影响。6,10此外,一些关于癌症死亡率和他汀类药物使用的研究发现了保护作用,包括丹麦对295,925名癌症患者的回顾性研究,以及芬兰对31,114名患者的回顾性研究,这些研究专门检查了他汀类药物的使用和乳腺癌死亡率。相比之下,胆固醇治疗试验(CTT)合作18数据库中随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,他汀类药物的使用与癌症死亡率或发病率之间没有关联。尽管如此,总体而言,关于他汀类药物使用和非皮肤癌症的文献比他汀类药物使用和NMSC之间的积极关系更有暗示作用,尽管这种差异的原因尚不清楚。鉴于文献中这些相互矛盾的发现,Wang等人的研究建议未来的研究重点是澄清可能介导他汀类药物使用和增加NMSC风险的生物学机制,特别是如果他汀类药物的皮肤效应与非皮肤效应不同。根据2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南,他汀类药物的使用不断扩大,癌症目前是美国第二大死亡原因,了解他汀类药物是否真的影响癌症的发病率和进展,以及这种影响是否因癌症类型而异,这一点至关重要。他汀类药物的使用和癌症之间的一些生物学机制已经被提出,尽管没有一个是确定的。保护性和非保护性的生物学机制都被认为与他汀类药物的使用和癌症的发病率和进展有关。就保护机制而言,较低的胆固醇水平可能会阻止细胞增殖,而细胞增殖对癌症的发展至关重要他汀类药物也被认为可以停止细胞周期,干扰血管生成,影响细胞粘附和炎症,所有这些机制都可能降低癌症风险。他汀类药物也被认为可以抑制g蛋白的戊酰化,这也可能降低癌症的风险和进展特别是对于NMSC,他汀类药物可能通过降低胆固醇水平和影响raf -丝裂原活化蛋白激酶1 (MEK)途径导致角化细胞凋亡较低的胆固醇水平也被认为可以抑制刺猬信号通路,这被认为对BCC的进展很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: Prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative
The relationship between the use of statins (3-hydroxy3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) and multiple cancer types has been the focus of many studies. A recent prospective study by Wang et al.1 investigated the relationship between statin use and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the large, prospective Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Although usually not life-threatening, NMSC is the most common cancer in the United States (over 5.4 million cases yearly) and leads to a high economic burden.2 With the high incidence of NMSC and the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines3 which have increased the indications for statin use in the United States, better understanding of the relationship between statin use and NMSC is particularly important. The WHI study found that among a cohort of 118,357 women, use of any statin at baseline was associated with increased NMSC (odds ratio (OR), 1.21, 1.07–1.35). The study also found that the effect was most pronounced for lipophilic statins (OR 1.39, 1.18–1.64), including lovastatin and simvastatin. Statins carry a photosensitivity warning, and prior clinical studies have suggested that statins may be associated with increased NMSC incidence. In the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Heart Protection Study (HPS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), NMSC was found to have a higher incidence in the treatment groups.4,5 A large meta-analysis of RCTs, cohort studies, and case–control studies on statins and all-cancer incidence also found increased NMSC risk among statin users.6 Additionally, two large European studies found increased NMSC or BCC incidence associated with the use of all or particular statin types.7,8 However, some conflicting evidence exists in literature, as other studies including meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported no significant relationship between statin use and NMSC risk,7,9,10 and studies have also suggested decreased NMSC risk associated with statin use.11,12 These conflicting findings are somewhat difficult to put into context, as prospective studies and RCTs investigating this relationship have been limited. In contrast to the findings on skin cancer and statin use, the literature on statin use and other non-cutaneous cancers has mostly reported decreased incidence13–16 or no effect.6,10 Additionally, several studies on cancer mortality and statin use have found protective effects, including a retrospective study of 295,925 cancer patients in Denmark17 and a retrospective study in Finland among 31,114 patients which examined statin use and breast cancer mortality specifically. In contrast, a meta-analysis of RCTs in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration18 database reported no association between statin use and either cancer mortality or incidence. Nonetheless, overall the literature on statin use and noncutaneous cancers is more suggestive of a positive relationship than statin use and NMSC, though reasons for such a difference are unclear. Given these conflicting findings in literature, a future research priority suggested by the Wang et al. research is clarifying the biological mechanisms that may mediate statin use and increased NMSC risk and in particular if the cutaneous effects on statins differ from their non-cutaneous effects. As the use of statins continues to expand under the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and cancer is currently the second leading cause of death in the United States, it is crucial to understand whether or not statins actually affect cancer incidence and progression and if this effect differs depending on the type of cancer. Several biological mechanisms linking statin use and cancer have been proposed, though none are definitive. Both protective and non-protective biological mechanisms have been suggested in relation to statin use and cancer incidence and progression. In terms of protective mechanisms, lower cholesterol levels may block cell proliferation that is essential to cancer progression.19 Statins have also been hypothesized to halt the cell cycle,20 interfere with angiogenesis,21 and affect cell adhesion and inflammation;22 all of these mechanisms may lead to lower cancer risk. Statins are also believed to inhibit the prenylation of G-proteins which may also decrease cancer risk and progression.23 For NMSC specifically, statins may cause apoptosis of keratinocytes through decreasing levels of cholesterol and affecting the RAF-mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (MEK) pathway.24 Lower cholesterol levels are also hypothesized to inhibit the Hedgehog signaling pathway which is believed to be important for progression of BCC.25 However, in terms of non-protective mechanisms, statins have been implicated in increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and as well as regulatory T cells; these effects Relation of statin use with non-melanoma skin cancer: Prospective results from the Women’s Health Initiative 667958WHE0010.1177/1745505716667958Women’s HealthEditorial editorial2016
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信