AIO腹板装置是否适用于所有直肠癌患者

Q4 Medicine
Nowotwory Pub Date : 2018-05-23 DOI:10.5603/NJO.2017.0056
D. Hempel, Joanna Mandrosz, M. Wojtukiewicz, T. Filipowski, E. Sierko
{"title":"AIO腹板装置是否适用于所有直肠癌患者","authors":"D. Hempel, Joanna Mandrosz, M. Wojtukiewicz, T. Filipowski, E. Sierko","doi":"10.5603/NJO.2017.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. To compare the prone position on a flat table vs an “All in one” belly board device (AIO BBD) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs). Material and methods. Fifteen RCPs scheduled for irradiation were scanned in the two evaluated positions. After tomography, they completed a questionnaire concerning positioning. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the small bowel and bladder were compared for both immobilization methods and setup accuracy was analyzed in electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) and X-ray volume imaging (XVI) procedures. Results. AIO BBD was accepted by the majority of RCPs and provided better DVHs for the small bowel than the prone position on a flat table. The setup reproducibility was within tolerance limit for patients with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2. Patients with obesity regarded AIO BBD as uncomfortable and they presented mean setup shifts out of the tolerance limit in the Y axis — 5.9 mm. Conclusions. The AIO BBD should be recommended for RCPs, especially for those with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2.","PeriodicalId":39938,"journal":{"name":"Nowotwory","volume":"16 1","pages":"342-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is AIO belly board device advantageous in all rectal cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"D. Hempel, Joanna Mandrosz, M. Wojtukiewicz, T. Filipowski, E. Sierko\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/NJO.2017.0056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. To compare the prone position on a flat table vs an “All in one” belly board device (AIO BBD) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs). Material and methods. Fifteen RCPs scheduled for irradiation were scanned in the two evaluated positions. After tomography, they completed a questionnaire concerning positioning. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the small bowel and bladder were compared for both immobilization methods and setup accuracy was analyzed in electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) and X-ray volume imaging (XVI) procedures. Results. AIO BBD was accepted by the majority of RCPs and provided better DVHs for the small bowel than the prone position on a flat table. The setup reproducibility was within tolerance limit for patients with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2. Patients with obesity regarded AIO BBD as uncomfortable and they presented mean setup shifts out of the tolerance limit in the Y axis — 5.9 mm. Conclusions. The AIO BBD should be recommended for RCPs, especially for those with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nowotwory\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"342-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nowotwory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2017.0056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nowotwory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NJO.2017.0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。比较直肠癌患者(rcp)的俯卧位和“All in one”腹部板装置(AIO BBD)。材料和方法。在两个评估位置扫描15个计划照射的rcp。断层扫描后,他们完成了一份关于体位的问卷。比较了两种固定方法下小肠和膀胱的剂量-体积直方图(DVHs),并分析了电子门静脉成像装置(EPIDs)和x射线体积成像(XVI)程序的设置准确性。结果。AIO BBD被大多数rcp接受,并且比俯卧在平台上提供更好的小肠dvh。对于BMI≤29 kg/m2的患者,设置的重复性在耐受范围内。肥胖患者认为AIO型BBD不舒服,他们在Y轴上的平均设置偏离了耐受极限- 5.9 mm。结论。对于rcp患者,尤其是BMI≤29 kg/m2的患者,应推荐AIO BBD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is AIO belly board device advantageous in all rectal cancer patients
Purpose. To compare the prone position on a flat table vs an “All in one” belly board device (AIO BBD) in rectal cancer patients (RCPs). Material and methods. Fifteen RCPs scheduled for irradiation were scanned in the two evaluated positions. After tomography, they completed a questionnaire concerning positioning. The dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for the small bowel and bladder were compared for both immobilization methods and setup accuracy was analyzed in electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) and X-ray volume imaging (XVI) procedures. Results. AIO BBD was accepted by the majority of RCPs and provided better DVHs for the small bowel than the prone position on a flat table. The setup reproducibility was within tolerance limit for patients with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2. Patients with obesity regarded AIO BBD as uncomfortable and they presented mean setup shifts out of the tolerance limit in the Y axis — 5.9 mm. Conclusions. The AIO BBD should be recommended for RCPs, especially for those with BMI ≤ 29 kg/m2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nowotwory
Nowotwory Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: NOWOTWORY Journal of Oncology publishes papers which cover all aspects of oncology but concentrates on clinical studies, both research orientated and treatment orientated, rather than on laboratory studies. Contributions are also welcomed from the fields of epidemiology, tumor pathology, radiobiology and radiation physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信