脑桥卒中患者接受重复经颅磁刺激以改善手部功能的N-of-1试验

Kate L. Frost, J. Carey, Thomas W. Broback, Nicole L. Carlson, Caitlin A. Daggett, Megan M. Dalbec, B. Mueller
{"title":"脑桥卒中患者接受重复经颅磁刺激以改善手部功能的N-of-1试验","authors":"Kate L. Frost, J. Carey, Thomas W. Broback, Nicole L. Carlson, Caitlin A. Daggett, Megan M. Dalbec, B. Mueller","doi":"10.17756/JNPN.2017-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stroke characteristics vary widely between individuals making it difficult to assess the value of stroke rehabilitation interventions. To eliminate inter-subject variability, this study used an N-of-1 randomized, controlled design to explore the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in one unique individual with pontine stroke. We hypothesized that five days of active 6-Hz primed, low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional primary motor area (M1), combined with finger movement tracking training, would accomplish greater gains in hand function than sham rTMS combined with tracking training. We assessed hand function (Box and Block test and finger tracking test), cortical activation (laterality index during functional magnetic resonance imaging), and cortical excitability (interhemispheric inhibition testing (IHI) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assessed the integrity of his corticospinal tracts at baseline. Results showed no improvement in the Box and Block or finger tracking tests, unreliable IHI findings, and no change in laterality index following active rTMS. DTI suggested truncation of the left corticospinal tract (CST) at the pons. His non-dexterous hand movements combined with no elicitable motor evoked potentials with TMS to ipsilesional M1 and his DTI findings lead us to speculate a reticulospinal mechanism for preserving his rudimentary paretic hand control. We conclude that rTMS combined with tracking training was not effective in the absence of CST pathways and that research is needed to confirm markers of reticulospinal function in humans as an alternative to defective CST function.","PeriodicalId":91910,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N-of-1 Trial in Person with Pontine Stroke Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Hand Function\",\"authors\":\"Kate L. Frost, J. Carey, Thomas W. Broback, Nicole L. Carlson, Caitlin A. Daggett, Megan M. Dalbec, B. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.17756/JNPN.2017-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stroke characteristics vary widely between individuals making it difficult to assess the value of stroke rehabilitation interventions. To eliminate inter-subject variability, this study used an N-of-1 randomized, controlled design to explore the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in one unique individual with pontine stroke. We hypothesized that five days of active 6-Hz primed, low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional primary motor area (M1), combined with finger movement tracking training, would accomplish greater gains in hand function than sham rTMS combined with tracking training. We assessed hand function (Box and Block test and finger tracking test), cortical activation (laterality index during functional magnetic resonance imaging), and cortical excitability (interhemispheric inhibition testing (IHI) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assessed the integrity of his corticospinal tracts at baseline. Results showed no improvement in the Box and Block or finger tracking tests, unreliable IHI findings, and no change in laterality index following active rTMS. DTI suggested truncation of the left corticospinal tract (CST) at the pons. His non-dexterous hand movements combined with no elicitable motor evoked potentials with TMS to ipsilesional M1 and his DTI findings lead us to speculate a reticulospinal mechanism for preserving his rudimentary paretic hand control. We conclude that rTMS combined with tracking training was not effective in the absence of CST pathways and that research is needed to confirm markers of reticulospinal function in humans as an alternative to defective CST function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17756/JNPN.2017-017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroimaging in psychiatry & neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17756/JNPN.2017-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

个体间卒中特征差异很大,因此很难评估卒中康复干预措施的价值。为了消除受试者间的可变性,本研究采用N-of-1随机对照设计,探讨重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对一名独特的脑桥卒中患者的疗效。我们假设,对对照初级运动区(M1)进行为期5天的主动6hz启动低频rTMS,并结合手指运动跟踪训练,将比假rTMS结合跟踪训练获得更大的手部功能改善。我们评估了手功能(盒块测试和手指追踪测试)、皮质激活(功能性磁共振成像中的偏侧指数)和皮质兴奋性(经颅磁刺激(TMS)的半球间抑制测试(IHI)。弥散张量成像(DTI)在基线时评估其皮质脊髓束的完整性。结果显示,盒子和块或手指跟踪测试没有改善,不可靠的IHI结果,并且主动rTMS后侧度指数没有变化。DTI提示截断左脑桥皮质脊髓束(CST)。他的非灵巧手运动结合无诱发运动诱发电位与经颅磁刺激的同侧损伤M1和他的DTI发现使我们推测网状脊髓机制,以保持他的基本的麻痹手控制。我们的结论是,rTMS结合跟踪训练在CST通路缺失的情况下是无效的,需要研究来确认网状脊髓功能的标记物作为CST功能缺陷的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
N-of-1 Trial in Person with Pontine Stroke Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Hand Function
Stroke characteristics vary widely between individuals making it difficult to assess the value of stroke rehabilitation interventions. To eliminate inter-subject variability, this study used an N-of-1 randomized, controlled design to explore the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in one unique individual with pontine stroke. We hypothesized that five days of active 6-Hz primed, low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional primary motor area (M1), combined with finger movement tracking training, would accomplish greater gains in hand function than sham rTMS combined with tracking training. We assessed hand function (Box and Block test and finger tracking test), cortical activation (laterality index during functional magnetic resonance imaging), and cortical excitability (interhemispheric inhibition testing (IHI) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) assessed the integrity of his corticospinal tracts at baseline. Results showed no improvement in the Box and Block or finger tracking tests, unreliable IHI findings, and no change in laterality index following active rTMS. DTI suggested truncation of the left corticospinal tract (CST) at the pons. His non-dexterous hand movements combined with no elicitable motor evoked potentials with TMS to ipsilesional M1 and his DTI findings lead us to speculate a reticulospinal mechanism for preserving his rudimentary paretic hand control. We conclude that rTMS combined with tracking training was not effective in the absence of CST pathways and that research is needed to confirm markers of reticulospinal function in humans as an alternative to defective CST function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信