政治权利和自由:内容确定性的问题

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
M. Presnyakov
{"title":"政治权利和自由:内容确定性的问题","authors":"M. Presnyakov","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “political rights” of a person and a citizen, widely used today, is in fact far from certain, both in terms of the specific rights that it is generally customary to include in its content and in terms of the specific powers that would constitute the content of these rights. In this regard, this article analyses political rights themselves, which the author finds necessary to distinguish from human rights in the socio-political sphere. The latter include freedom of assembly, the right to petition, freedom of speech, the right to unite, etc. Considerable attention is paid to the substantive characteristics of political rights: thus, the author concludes that “participation in state affairs” although it is named as a right in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, cannot claim the role of real and current subjective public law. Transformations of classical political rights ensuring the participation of citizens in power in modern political and legal discourse are analyzed. The problematic aspects of the concept of national representation and constituent power are considered. The author concludes that even with the most adequate and authentic mechanisms for the exercise of the right to popular representation, such power never belongs fully to the people. The article justifies that the natural political right is the right to revolt (“the right to resistance”, “the right to revolution”). The natural political right of the people “to revolt” acquires the characteristic of precisely “right”, and not a bare political opportunity only if there are institutions of legitimization and subsequent legalization. As a result, the right at the present stage would be better described as the right to a legitimate rule of law.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political rights and freedoms: Problems of content certainty\",\"authors\":\"M. Presnyakov\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2022.216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of “political rights” of a person and a citizen, widely used today, is in fact far from certain, both in terms of the specific rights that it is generally customary to include in its content and in terms of the specific powers that would constitute the content of these rights. In this regard, this article analyses political rights themselves, which the author finds necessary to distinguish from human rights in the socio-political sphere. The latter include freedom of assembly, the right to petition, freedom of speech, the right to unite, etc. Considerable attention is paid to the substantive characteristics of political rights: thus, the author concludes that “participation in state affairs” although it is named as a right in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, cannot claim the role of real and current subjective public law. Transformations of classical political rights ensuring the participation of citizens in power in modern political and legal discourse are analyzed. The problematic aspects of the concept of national representation and constituent power are considered. The author concludes that even with the most adequate and authentic mechanisms for the exercise of the right to popular representation, such power never belongs fully to the people. The article justifies that the natural political right is the right to revolt (“the right to resistance”, “the right to revolution”). The natural political right of the people “to revolt” acquires the characteristic of precisely “right”, and not a bare political opportunity only if there are institutions of legitimization and subsequent legalization. As a result, the right at the present stage would be better described as the right to a legitimate rule of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天广泛使用的个人和公民的“政治权利”概念实际上远非确定,无论是就其通常习惯上包括在其内容中的具体权利而言,还是就构成这些权利内容的具体权力而言。在这方面,本文分析了政治权利本身,作者认为有必要将其与社会政治领域的人权区分开来。后者包括集会自由、请愿权、言论自由、结社权等。对政治权利的实质特征给予了相当的关注:因此,作者得出结论,“参与国家事务”虽然在俄罗斯联邦宪法中被命名为一项权利,但不能要求具有现实的和现行的主观公法的作用。分析了古典政治权利在现代政治和法律话语中确保公民参与权力的转变。本文考虑了国家代表权和组成权力概念的问题方面。作者的结论是,即使有最充分和最真实的机制来行使人民代表权,这种权力也永远不会完全属于人民。该条款证明,自然的政治权利是反抗的权利(“反抗的权利”,“革命的权利”)。人民“反抗”的自然政治权利恰恰具有“权利”的特征,而不是纯粹的政治机会,只有在存在合法化和随后的合法化制度的情况下。因此,目前阶段的权利最好被描述为合法法治的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political rights and freedoms: Problems of content certainty
The concept of “political rights” of a person and a citizen, widely used today, is in fact far from certain, both in terms of the specific rights that it is generally customary to include in its content and in terms of the specific powers that would constitute the content of these rights. In this regard, this article analyses political rights themselves, which the author finds necessary to distinguish from human rights in the socio-political sphere. The latter include freedom of assembly, the right to petition, freedom of speech, the right to unite, etc. Considerable attention is paid to the substantive characteristics of political rights: thus, the author concludes that “participation in state affairs” although it is named as a right in the Constitution of the Russian Federation, cannot claim the role of real and current subjective public law. Transformations of classical political rights ensuring the participation of citizens in power in modern political and legal discourse are analyzed. The problematic aspects of the concept of national representation and constituent power are considered. The author concludes that even with the most adequate and authentic mechanisms for the exercise of the right to popular representation, such power never belongs fully to the people. The article justifies that the natural political right is the right to revolt (“the right to resistance”, “the right to revolution”). The natural political right of the people “to revolt” acquires the characteristic of precisely “right”, and not a bare political opportunity only if there are institutions of legitimization and subsequent legalization. As a result, the right at the present stage would be better described as the right to a legitimate rule of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信