跨护士临床经验水平的差险事故报告的差异:使用来自日本质量医疗保健委员会的全国数据库

Naomi Akiyama, T. Akiyama, K. Hayashida, Junko Igawa, Tomomi Matsuno, Riju Kono, T. Shiroiwa, K. Koeda, K. Kanda
{"title":"跨护士临床经验水平的差险事故报告的差异:使用来自日本质量医疗保健委员会的全国数据库","authors":"Naomi Akiyama, T. Akiyama, K. Hayashida, Junko Igawa, Tomomi Matsuno, Riju Kono, T. Shiroiwa, K. Koeda, K. Kanda","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2019.37331.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Medical incidents occur frequently, necessitating a more effective prevention policy. Nurses have the highest employment rates in the healthcare occupations; therefore, they are a key to improving patient safety. Most reports of errors have focused on medicine errors by nurses or patient falls; however, the effects of different types of error and nurses’ experience have not been examined. The present study aimed to elucidate the factors that influence differences in reported near-miss incidents across clinical experience levels and department assignments. Material and Methods: A quantitative study was conducted using published data from the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. We analysed clinical experience level by near miss types. Results: A total of 17,105 cases were analysed (14,896 drug near misses, 1,857 medical device near misses, and 162 nursing near misses). Participants had a mean of 7.4 years of experience and a mean of 2.3 years within the department. Statistically significant differences between clinical experience level, events, drug administration, and medical devices used were observed. However, no differences were found in terms of nursing care near misses. Length of department assignment was related to the “human factors” in participants at Novice/Advanced beginner levels, as well as “environment/facilities and devices” in those at Competent and Proficient/Expert levels. The percentage of “environment/facilities and devices” that caused near misses with drugs and medical devices increased as clinical experience increased. Conclusion: The present study described the characteristics of clinical experience levels, providing meaningful information useful for developing new educational paradigms for effective training.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"1 1","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in near miss incident reports across clinical experience levels in nurses: using national wide data base from the Japan council for quality healthcare\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Akiyama, T. Akiyama, K. Hayashida, Junko Igawa, Tomomi Matsuno, Riju Kono, T. Shiroiwa, K. Koeda, K. Kanda\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/PSJ.2019.37331.1204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Medical incidents occur frequently, necessitating a more effective prevention policy. Nurses have the highest employment rates in the healthcare occupations; therefore, they are a key to improving patient safety. Most reports of errors have focused on medicine errors by nurses or patient falls; however, the effects of different types of error and nurses’ experience have not been examined. The present study aimed to elucidate the factors that influence differences in reported near-miss incidents across clinical experience levels and department assignments. Material and Methods: A quantitative study was conducted using published data from the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. We analysed clinical experience level by near miss types. Results: A total of 17,105 cases were analysed (14,896 drug near misses, 1,857 medical device near misses, and 162 nursing near misses). Participants had a mean of 7.4 years of experience and a mean of 2.3 years within the department. Statistically significant differences between clinical experience level, events, drug administration, and medical devices used were observed. However, no differences were found in terms of nursing care near misses. Length of department assignment was related to the “human factors” in participants at Novice/Advanced beginner levels, as well as “environment/facilities and devices” in those at Competent and Proficient/Expert levels. The percentage of “environment/facilities and devices” that caused near misses with drugs and medical devices increased as clinical experience increased. Conclusion: The present study described the characteristics of clinical experience levels, providing meaningful information useful for developing new educational paradigms for effective training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"56-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2019.37331.1204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2019.37331.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:医疗事故时有发生,需要更有效的预防政策。在医疗保健职业中,护士的就业率最高;因此,它们是提高患者安全的关键。大多数错误报告都集中在护士的医疗错误或患者跌倒;然而,不同类型的错误和护士的经验的影响还没有被检查。本研究旨在阐明影响不同临床经验水平和科室报告的未遂事故差异的因素。材料和方法:使用日本优质保健委员会公布的数据进行了定量研究。我们通过近错过类型分析临床经验水平。结果:共分析17105例,其中药品险情14896例,医疗器械险情1857例,护理险情162例。参与者的平均工作经验为7.4年,在部门工作的平均时间为2.3年。观察到临床经验水平、事件、药物管理和使用的医疗器械之间存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,在护理失误方面没有发现差异。在初级/高级初级水平的参与者中,部门任务的长度与“人为因素”有关,而在胜任和精通/专家水平的参与者中,则与“环境/设施和设备”有关。随着临床经验的增加,“环境/设施和设备”导致药品和医疗器械险些漏手的百分比也在增加。结论:本研究描述了临床经验水平的特点,为制定有效培训的新教育模式提供了有意义的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in near miss incident reports across clinical experience levels in nurses: using national wide data base from the Japan council for quality healthcare
Introduction: Medical incidents occur frequently, necessitating a more effective prevention policy. Nurses have the highest employment rates in the healthcare occupations; therefore, they are a key to improving patient safety. Most reports of errors have focused on medicine errors by nurses or patient falls; however, the effects of different types of error and nurses’ experience have not been examined. The present study aimed to elucidate the factors that influence differences in reported near-miss incidents across clinical experience levels and department assignments. Material and Methods: A quantitative study was conducted using published data from the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. We analysed clinical experience level by near miss types. Results: A total of 17,105 cases were analysed (14,896 drug near misses, 1,857 medical device near misses, and 162 nursing near misses). Participants had a mean of 7.4 years of experience and a mean of 2.3 years within the department. Statistically significant differences between clinical experience level, events, drug administration, and medical devices used were observed. However, no differences were found in terms of nursing care near misses. Length of department assignment was related to the “human factors” in participants at Novice/Advanced beginner levels, as well as “environment/facilities and devices” in those at Competent and Proficient/Expert levels. The percentage of “environment/facilities and devices” that caused near misses with drugs and medical devices increased as clinical experience increased. Conclusion: The present study described the characteristics of clinical experience levels, providing meaningful information useful for developing new educational paradigms for effective training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信