连续实践中情境干扰的程度是什么?元分析综述

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL

Journal of Motor Learning and Development Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1123/jmld.2021-0020

G. Lage, L. O. Faria, N. A. Ambrósio, Athos M.P. Borges, Tércio Apolinário-Souza

{"title":"连续实践中情境干扰的程度是什么?元分析综述","authors":"G. Lage, L. O. Faria, N. A. Ambrósio, Athos M.P. Borges, Tércio Apolinário-Souza","doi":"10.1123/jmld.2021-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over 40 years, the contextual interference effect in motor learning has been investigated. While the difference between levels of contextual interference experienced under blocked and random practice are well established, the difference in the levels of contextual interference experienced under serial and random practice is still ambiguous. Therefore, a meta-analytic review was conducted to clarify this inconsistency. We focused on one question: Do random practice and serial practice have the same effect on motor learning? ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus database were searched. Nine studies were included. The results of our meta-analyses show that serial and random practices present the same results in terms of performance in retention and transfer tests. This result is aligned to the original ﬁnding of the contextual interference effect, as well as its explanatory hypotheses. In addition, a complementary explanation in defense of the same mechanisms operating in serial and random practices is discussed. In conclusion, our results suggest that serial practice present high contextual interference.","PeriodicalId":37368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Learning and Development","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is the Level of Contextual Interference in Serial Practice? A Meta-Analytic Review\",\"authors\":\"G. Lage, L. O. Faria, N. A. Ambrósio, Athos M.P. Borges, Tércio Apolinário-Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jmld.2021-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over 40 years, the contextual interference effect in motor learning has been investigated. While the difference between levels of contextual interference experienced under blocked and random practice are well established, the difference in the levels of contextual interference experienced under serial and random practice is still ambiguous. Therefore, a meta-analytic review was conducted to clarify this inconsistency. We focused on one question: Do random practice and serial practice have the same effect on motor learning? ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus database were searched. Nine studies were included. The results of our meta-analyses show that serial and random practices present the same results in terms of performance in retention and transfer tests. This result is aligned to the original ﬁnding of the contextual interference effect, as well as its explanatory hypotheses. In addition, a complementary explanation in defense of the same mechanisms operating in serial and random practices is discussed. In conclusion, our results suggest that serial practice present high contextual interference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Motor Learning and Development\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Motor Learning and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2021-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Learning and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2021-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

四十多年来，人们一直在研究运动学习中的情境干扰效应。虽然在阻塞和随机实践中经历的情境干扰水平之间的差异已经得到了很好的确立，但在连续和随机实践中经历的情境干扰水平的差异仍然是模糊的。因此，我们进行了一项荟萃分析来澄清这种不一致。我们专注于一个问题:随机练习和连续练习对运动学习有同样的效果吗?检索ISI Web of Science、PubMed和Scopus数据库。纳入了9项研究。我们的荟萃分析结果表明，就保留和转移测试的性能而言，连续和随机实践呈现相同的结果。这一结果与上下文干扰效应的原始发现及其解释假设一致。此外，本文还讨论了对在连续和随机实践中运行的相同机制进行辩护的补充解释。综上所述，我们的研究结果表明，连续练习存在高度的语境干扰。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What Is the Level of Contextual Interference in Serial Practice? A Meta-Analytic Review

For over 40 years, the contextual interference effect in motor learning has been investigated. While the difference between levels of contextual interference experienced under blocked and random practice are well established, the difference in the levels of contextual interference experienced under serial and random practice is still ambiguous. Therefore, a meta-analytic review was conducted to clarify this inconsistency. We focused on one question: Do random practice and serial practice have the same effect on motor learning? ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus database were searched. Nine studies were included. The results of our meta-analyses show that serial and random practices present the same results in terms of performance in retention and transfer tests. This result is aligned to the original ﬁnding of the contextual interference effect, as well as its explanatory hypotheses. In addition, a complementary explanation in defense of the same mechanisms operating in serial and random practices is discussed. In conclusion, our results suggest that serial practice present high contextual interference.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Motor Learning and Development Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Motor Learning and Development (JMLD) publishes peer-reviewed research that advances the understanding of movement skill acquisition and expression across the lifespan. JMLD aims to provide a platform for theoretical, translational, applied, and innovative research related to factors that influence the learning or re-learning of skills in individuals with various movement-relevant abilities and disabilities.