北卡罗来纳州格伦诺拉市三一美国公司社区暴露评估及干预效果。

S. Levine, C. Redinger, W. P. Robert
{"title":"北卡罗来纳州格伦诺拉市三一美国公司社区暴露评估及干预效果。","authors":"S. Levine, C. Redinger, W. P. Robert","doi":"10.1080/15298660108984665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study was a critical investigation of the analytical methodology and exposure assessment components of an intervention that led to the closure of a polyurethane foaming plant in Glenola, N.C., where plant neighbors reported a wide range of adverse health effects. Resident complaints and reports of nuisance odors and health effects persisted for many years, coming to a head in late 1995 and early 1996. Central to state and federal agency activities was the determination of the concentrations of air contaminants including toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at the plant fence line to establish an empirical foundation for resident complaints. Well over 2000 air concentration measurements were collected in the 18-month period prior to intervention and plant closure in September 1997. Results showed that flawed methodology, including poor quality assurance and improper interpretation of the data, may have led to improper conclusions and the inappropriate closing of this facility. Agency data did not show that ambient air concentrations of TDI at the plant fence line exceeded any required or recommended concentration limit. Furthermore, the identity and concentration of other air contaminants were not thoroughly investigated. Key lessons learned are that such interventions must be based on well-designed and executed exposure assessments. Resultant risk determinations must be based on sound science and methods.","PeriodicalId":7449,"journal":{"name":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","volume":"11 1","pages":"649-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community exposure assessment and intervention effectiveness at Trinity American Corporation, Glenola, North Carolina.\",\"authors\":\"S. Levine, C. Redinger, W. P. Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15298660108984665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case study was a critical investigation of the analytical methodology and exposure assessment components of an intervention that led to the closure of a polyurethane foaming plant in Glenola, N.C., where plant neighbors reported a wide range of adverse health effects. Resident complaints and reports of nuisance odors and health effects persisted for many years, coming to a head in late 1995 and early 1996. Central to state and federal agency activities was the determination of the concentrations of air contaminants including toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at the plant fence line to establish an empirical foundation for resident complaints. Well over 2000 air concentration measurements were collected in the 18-month period prior to intervention and plant closure in September 1997. Results showed that flawed methodology, including poor quality assurance and improper interpretation of the data, may have led to improper conclusions and the inappropriate closing of this facility. Agency data did not show that ambient air concentrations of TDI at the plant fence line exceeded any required or recommended concentration limit. Furthermore, the identity and concentration of other air contaminants were not thoroughly investigated. Key lessons learned are that such interventions must be based on well-designed and executed exposure assessments. Resultant risk determinations must be based on sound science and methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"649-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本案例研究是对导致北卡罗来纳州格伦诺拉一家聚氨酯发泡厂关闭的干预措施的分析方法和暴露评估组成部分的重要调查,该工厂的邻居报告了广泛的不良健康影响。居民对难闻气味和健康影响的投诉和报告持续了许多年,在1995年底和1996年初达到顶峰。州和联邦机构活动的核心是确定工厂围栏线上的空气污染物浓度,包括甲苯二异氰酸酯(TDI),以建立居民投诉的经验基础。在干预和1997年9月工厂关闭之前的18个月里,收集了2000多项空气浓度测量数据。结果表明,有缺陷的方法,包括质量保证差和对数据的不适当解释,可能导致不适当的结论和不适当地关闭该设施。该机构的数据并未显示工厂围栏附近的环境空气中TDI的浓度超过任何要求或建议的浓度限值。此外,其他空气污染物的特性和浓度也没有得到彻底的调查。从中得到的主要教训是,此类干预措施必须以精心设计和执行的暴露评估为基础。由此产生的风险确定必须基于可靠的科学和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community exposure assessment and intervention effectiveness at Trinity American Corporation, Glenola, North Carolina.
This case study was a critical investigation of the analytical methodology and exposure assessment components of an intervention that led to the closure of a polyurethane foaming plant in Glenola, N.C., where plant neighbors reported a wide range of adverse health effects. Resident complaints and reports of nuisance odors and health effects persisted for many years, coming to a head in late 1995 and early 1996. Central to state and federal agency activities was the determination of the concentrations of air contaminants including toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at the plant fence line to establish an empirical foundation for resident complaints. Well over 2000 air concentration measurements were collected in the 18-month period prior to intervention and plant closure in September 1997. Results showed that flawed methodology, including poor quality assurance and improper interpretation of the data, may have led to improper conclusions and the inappropriate closing of this facility. Agency data did not show that ambient air concentrations of TDI at the plant fence line exceeded any required or recommended concentration limit. Furthermore, the identity and concentration of other air contaminants were not thoroughly investigated. Key lessons learned are that such interventions must be based on well-designed and executed exposure assessments. Resultant risk determinations must be based on sound science and methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信