COVID-19和健康和社会保健研究，政策和实践的联合生产:第1卷:联合生产的挑战和必要性，彼得·贝雷斯福德，米歇尔·法尔，加里·希基，Meerat Kaur，约瑟芬·奥克鲁，多琳·坦博和奥利·威廉姆斯(编)

IF 1.8 3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK

British Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcab229

Autumn Roesch‐Marsh

{"title":"COVID-19和健康和社会保健研究，政策和实践的联合生产:第1卷:联合生产的挑战和必要性，彼得·贝雷斯福德，米歇尔·法尔，加里·希基，Meerat Kaur，约瑟芬·奥克鲁，多琳·坦博和奥利·威廉姆斯(编)","authors":"Autumn Roesch‐Marsh","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcab229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book includes sixteen chapters written by a diverse group of fortyeight authors from across the fields of health, social work and social care. These authors have multiple identities in their fields and bring experiences of receiving services, providing services, research and the academy, activism and community work, advocacy and policy development. The book was published by Policy Press as part of the Rapid Responses pandemic series. It is one of two volumes published on the theme of co-production in health and social care research, policy and practice. The books are both free and open access and this was funded by the Health Foundation. In this review, I will discuss Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-production. I believe this book should be essential reading for all of us working in the fields of health, social work and social care. There are three reasons for this. The first relates to the way the book was written and what we can learn from this. As the editors explain in the introduction to the book, in what I expect is a bit of an understatement, bringing together such a large and diverse group of authors during a pandemic was a ‘challenge’. However, they sought to develop the book in a way that reflected the principles of participatory practice. This meant that they worked to support a diverse range of different contributions and enable new collaborations. The editors highlight that achieving their participatory aims for the book was not easy and they suggest they were not always successful. Despite this, it is clear they have achieved something really unique and important. They have managed to bring together a genuinely diverse range of authors, centring voices and experiences that are often marginalised within the academy. For example, Chapter 8 Sovereign and","PeriodicalId":48259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Work","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and Co-Production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice: Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-Production, Peter Beresford, Michelle Farr, Gary Hickey, Meerat Kaur, Josephine Ocloo, Doreen Tembo and Oli Williams (eds)\",\"authors\":\"Autumn Roesch‐Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsw/bcab229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This book includes sixteen chapters written by a diverse group of fortyeight authors from across the fields of health, social work and social care. These authors have multiple identities in their fields and bring experiences of receiving services, providing services, research and the academy, activism and community work, advocacy and policy development. The book was published by Policy Press as part of the Rapid Responses pandemic series. It is one of two volumes published on the theme of co-production in health and social care research, policy and practice. The books are both free and open access and this was funded by the Health Foundation. In this review, I will discuss Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-production. I believe this book should be essential reading for all of us working in the fields of health, social work and social care. There are three reasons for this. The first relates to the way the book was written and what we can learn from this. As the editors explain in the introduction to the book, in what I expect is a bit of an understatement, bringing together such a large and diverse group of authors during a pandemic was a ‘challenge’. However, they sought to develop the book in a way that reflected the principles of participatory practice. This meant that they worked to support a diverse range of different contributions and enable new collaborations. The editors highlight that achieving their participatory aims for the book was not easy and they suggest they were not always successful. Despite this, it is clear they have achieved something really unique and important. They have managed to bring together a genuinely diverse range of authors, centring voices and experiences that are often marginalised within the academy. For example, Chapter 8 Sovereign and\",\"PeriodicalId\":48259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书包括16章，由来自健康、社会工作和社会关怀领域的48位作者组成的不同小组撰写。这些作者在各自的领域拥有多重身份，并带来了接受服务、提供服务、研究和学术、行动主义和社区工作、倡导和政策制定的经验。该书由政策出版社出版，是《快速应对大流行病》系列丛书的一部分。它是关于卫生和社会保健研究、政策和实践方面的合作生产主题的两卷书之一。这些书都是免费开放的，由健康基金会资助。在这篇综述中，我将讨论第1卷:合作生产的挑战和必要性。我相信这本书应该是我们所有在健康、社会工作和社会关怀领域工作的人的必读书目。这有三个原因。第一个是关于这本书的写作方式，以及我们可以从中学到什么。正如编辑们在书的引言中所解释的那样，我认为这有点轻描淡写，在大流行期间将如此庞大和多样化的作者群体聚集在一起是一项“挑战”。然而，他们试图以一种反映参与性实践原则的方式发展这本书。这意味着他们努力支持各种不同的贡献，并使新的合作成为可能。编辑们强调，实现这本书的参与性目标并不容易，他们认为他们并不总是成功的。尽管如此，很明显他们已经取得了一些真正独特和重要的成就。他们成功地汇集了真正多样化的作者，集中了在学术界经常被边缘化的声音和经历。例如，第8章，君主和

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

COVID-19 and Co-Production in Health and Social Care Research, Policy, and Practice: Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-Production, Peter Beresford, Michelle Farr, Gary Hickey, Meerat Kaur, Josephine Ocloo, Doreen Tembo and Oli Williams (eds)

This book includes sixteen chapters written by a diverse group of fortyeight authors from across the fields of health, social work and social care. These authors have multiple identities in their fields and bring experiences of receiving services, providing services, research and the academy, activism and community work, advocacy and policy development. The book was published by Policy Press as part of the Rapid Responses pandemic series. It is one of two volumes published on the theme of co-production in health and social care research, policy and practice. The books are both free and open access and this was funded by the Health Foundation. In this review, I will discuss Volume 1: The Challenges and Necessity of Co-production. I believe this book should be essential reading for all of us working in the fields of health, social work and social care. There are three reasons for this. The first relates to the way the book was written and what we can learn from this. As the editors explain in the introduction to the book, in what I expect is a bit of an understatement, bringing together such a large and diverse group of authors during a pandemic was a ‘challenge’. However, they sought to develop the book in a way that reflected the principles of participatory practice. This meant that they worked to support a diverse range of different contributions and enable new collaborations. The editors highlight that achieving their participatory aims for the book was not easy and they suggest they were not always successful. Despite this, it is clear they have achieved something really unique and important. They have managed to bring together a genuinely diverse range of authors, centring voices and experiences that are often marginalised within the academy. For example, Chapter 8 Sovereign and

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Journal of Social Work SOCIAL WORK-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

22.20%

发文量

208

期刊介绍： Published for the British Association of Social Workers, this is the leading academic social work journal in the UK. It covers every aspect of social work, with papers reporting research, discussing practice, and examining principles and theories. It is read by social work educators, researchers, practitioners and managers who wish to keep up to date with theoretical and empirical developments in the field.