气动扩张术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的近期和长期效果:16年的经验

Q4 Medicine
E. Veseliny, M. Janíčko, M. Zakuciová, P. Jarčuška
{"title":"气动扩张术治疗食管贲门失弛缓症的近期和长期效果:16年的经验","authors":"E. Veseliny, M. Janíčko, M. Zakuciová, P. Jarčuška","doi":"10.48095/ccgh2022236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is still a common treatment of oesophageal achalasia. This retrospective analysis informs about 16 years of experience with pneumatic dilation in the treatment of patients with achalasia. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with achalasia treated with endoscopic balloon dilation therapy were analysed retrospectively. The success of endoscopic pneumatic dilation was defined as no treatment other than pneumatic dilation and the overall clinical Eckardt score ≤ 3 (and at the same time each individual item <2). Results: From January 2004 to December 2019, 140 patients with achalasia consecutively underwent pneumatic dilation (67 males [47.9%], mean age 54.9 ±16.2 years). The median follow-up since the first dilation was 125 months (range 6–263 months). Satisfactory results were observed in 130 patients (92.9%). Out of the remaining ten patients, two (1.4%) had periprocedural oesophageal perforation and in 8 (5.7%) patients the treatment effect was insufficient. Out of all patients, 107/140 (76.4%) had only one PD, 22/140 (15.7%) had two PDs, three PDs were performed in 8/140 (5.7%) and four PDs in 3/140 (2.1%). Treatment failure was more common in patients who had more pneumatic dilations (1 PD 37.5%, 2 and more PDs 62.5%; P = 0.019). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation, starting with a 35 mm balloon, is an effective treatment for achalasia in the short and long term, with minimal morbidity. The possible incomplete effect of dilation therapy is more often manifested in an earlier period after the initial dilation therapy. Keywords achalasia, pneumatic dilation, long-term results, complications","PeriodicalId":38577,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term and long-term results of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of patients with esophageal achalasia: 16 years of experience\",\"authors\":\"E. Veseliny, M. Janíčko, M. Zakuciová, P. Jarčuška\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/ccgh2022236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is still a common treatment of oesophageal achalasia. This retrospective analysis informs about 16 years of experience with pneumatic dilation in the treatment of patients with achalasia. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with achalasia treated with endoscopic balloon dilation therapy were analysed retrospectively. The success of endoscopic pneumatic dilation was defined as no treatment other than pneumatic dilation and the overall clinical Eckardt score ≤ 3 (and at the same time each individual item <2). Results: From January 2004 to December 2019, 140 patients with achalasia consecutively underwent pneumatic dilation (67 males [47.9%], mean age 54.9 ±16.2 years). The median follow-up since the first dilation was 125 months (range 6–263 months). Satisfactory results were observed in 130 patients (92.9%). Out of the remaining ten patients, two (1.4%) had periprocedural oesophageal perforation and in 8 (5.7%) patients the treatment effect was insufficient. Out of all patients, 107/140 (76.4%) had only one PD, 22/140 (15.7%) had two PDs, three PDs were performed in 8/140 (5.7%) and four PDs in 3/140 (2.1%). Treatment failure was more common in patients who had more pneumatic dilations (1 PD 37.5%, 2 and more PDs 62.5%; P = 0.019). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation, starting with a 35 mm balloon, is an effective treatment for achalasia in the short and long term, with minimal morbidity. The possible incomplete effect of dilation therapy is more often manifested in an earlier period after the initial dilation therapy. Keywords achalasia, pneumatic dilation, long-term results, complications\",\"PeriodicalId\":38577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccgh2022236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccgh2022236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:气动扩张术(PD)仍是治疗食道失弛缓症的常用方法。本回顾性分析报告了16年来气动扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症患者的经验。患者和方法:回顾性分析连续行内镜球囊扩张治疗贲门失弛缓症的患者。内镜下气压扩张成功的定义为除气压扩张外无其他治疗,且临床Eckardt总分≤3分(同时各单项评分<2分)。结果:2004年1月至2019年12月,140例贲门失弛缓症患者连续行气动扩张术,其中男性67例(47.9%),平均年龄54.9±16.2岁。自第一次扩张后的中位随访时间为125个月(范围6-263个月)。130例(92.9%)患者满意。在剩余的10例患者中,2例(1.4%)发生术中食管穿孔,8例(5.7%)患者治疗效果不足。在所有患者中,107/140(76.4%)只有一次PD, 22/140(15.7%)有两次PD, 8/140有3次PD(5.7%), 3/140有4次PD(2.1%)。气管扩张次数较多的患者治疗失败更为常见(1 PD 37.5%, 2 PD及以上62.5%;P = 0.019)。结论:内镜下球囊扩张,从35mm球囊开始,是一种短期和长期治疗贲门失弛缓症的有效方法,发病率低。可能的不完全效果的扩张治疗更经常表现在初期扩张治疗后的较早时期。贲门失弛缓症;气压扩张;远期疗效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term and long-term results of pneumatic dilation in the treatment of patients with esophageal achalasia: 16 years of experience
Background: Pneumatic dilation (PD) is still a common treatment of oesophageal achalasia. This retrospective analysis informs about 16 years of experience with pneumatic dilation in the treatment of patients with achalasia. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients with achalasia treated with endoscopic balloon dilation therapy were analysed retrospectively. The success of endoscopic pneumatic dilation was defined as no treatment other than pneumatic dilation and the overall clinical Eckardt score ≤ 3 (and at the same time each individual item <2). Results: From January 2004 to December 2019, 140 patients with achalasia consecutively underwent pneumatic dilation (67 males [47.9%], mean age 54.9 ±16.2 years). The median follow-up since the first dilation was 125 months (range 6–263 months). Satisfactory results were observed in 130 patients (92.9%). Out of the remaining ten patients, two (1.4%) had periprocedural oesophageal perforation and in 8 (5.7%) patients the treatment effect was insufficient. Out of all patients, 107/140 (76.4%) had only one PD, 22/140 (15.7%) had two PDs, three PDs were performed in 8/140 (5.7%) and four PDs in 3/140 (2.1%). Treatment failure was more common in patients who had more pneumatic dilations (1 PD 37.5%, 2 and more PDs 62.5%; P = 0.019). Conclusions: Endoscopic balloon dilation, starting with a 35 mm balloon, is an effective treatment for achalasia in the short and long term, with minimal morbidity. The possible incomplete effect of dilation therapy is more often manifested in an earlier period after the initial dilation therapy. Keywords achalasia, pneumatic dilation, long-term results, complications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie
Gastroenterologie a Hepatologie Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信