来自泛美创伤学会国际创伤远程查房的COVID-19大流行急诊外科实践调查结果

N. Namias, E. Ginzburg, G. Pust, A. Marttos, G. Ruiz, R. Rattan, P. Byers, C. Olvera, D. Yeh, S. Satahoo
{"title":"来自泛美创伤学会国际创伤远程查房的COVID-19大流行急诊外科实践调查结果","authors":"N. Namias, E. Ginzburg, G. Pust, A. Marttos, G. Ruiz, R. Rattan, P. Byers, C. Olvera, D. Yeh, S. Satahoo","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: As of June 9, 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than 7 million people worldwide, causing more than 400,000 deaths. Acute-care surgery approaches in times of the COVID-19 pandemic were discussed during the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Tele-Grand Rounds meeting in April 27, 2020. The purpose of this study is to identity practice patterns among surgeons treating acute surgical diseases during the pandemic. Materials and methods: COVID-19 epidemiology, prevalence in surgical patients, and treatment options of patients with acute surgical diseases in the presence of SARS-CoV-2-positive status were discussed. An electronic audience response system was used to assess opinions and practice patterns of the participating surgeons. Deidentified data collection was performed, stored, and subsequently analyzed using Excel software 2018. Results: The conference was attended by 91 participants from 20 countries. Forty-six surgeons participated in the survey, with 36% practising at a hospital with >80 active COVID-19 inpatients. Forty-eight percent of the participating surgeons had provided surgical care for SARS-CoV2-positive (CoV+) patients. At the time of provider–patient interaction, 58% of surgeons were not aware of the CoV+ status. Surgeons reported changing practice patterns during the pandemic. They would treat CoV+ patients with acute cholecystitis with antibiotics only (64%), IR drain (12%), laparoscopic-(5%), open cholecystectomy (12%), and no opinion (7%). For acute appendicitis, 57% of surgeons favor antibiotics only vs open-(29%), laparoscopic appendicectomy (10%), and no opinion (4%). Gas/smoke-filtering systems for laparoscopy were available only to 14% of respondents. SARS-CoV-2 screening protocols utilize one RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (29%), two RNA-RT-PCR 72 hours apart (7%), and IgG/IgM plus RNA RT-PCR (17%); 17% have no screening capacities. Conclusion: Standard acute-care surgery practice patterns changed favoring nonoperative treatment. Testing protocols vary among healthcare systems. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes in acute-care surgery patients.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"158-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Pandemic Acute-care Surgery Practice Survey Results from the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Tele-Grand Rounds\",\"authors\":\"N. Namias, E. Ginzburg, G. Pust, A. Marttos, G. Ruiz, R. Rattan, P. Byers, C. Olvera, D. Yeh, S. Satahoo\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: As of June 9, 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than 7 million people worldwide, causing more than 400,000 deaths. Acute-care surgery approaches in times of the COVID-19 pandemic were discussed during the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Tele-Grand Rounds meeting in April 27, 2020. The purpose of this study is to identity practice patterns among surgeons treating acute surgical diseases during the pandemic. Materials and methods: COVID-19 epidemiology, prevalence in surgical patients, and treatment options of patients with acute surgical diseases in the presence of SARS-CoV-2-positive status were discussed. An electronic audience response system was used to assess opinions and practice patterns of the participating surgeons. Deidentified data collection was performed, stored, and subsequently analyzed using Excel software 2018. Results: The conference was attended by 91 participants from 20 countries. Forty-six surgeons participated in the survey, with 36% practising at a hospital with >80 active COVID-19 inpatients. Forty-eight percent of the participating surgeons had provided surgical care for SARS-CoV2-positive (CoV+) patients. At the time of provider–patient interaction, 58% of surgeons were not aware of the CoV+ status. Surgeons reported changing practice patterns during the pandemic. They would treat CoV+ patients with acute cholecystitis with antibiotics only (64%), IR drain (12%), laparoscopic-(5%), open cholecystectomy (12%), and no opinion (7%). For acute appendicitis, 57% of surgeons favor antibiotics only vs open-(29%), laparoscopic appendicectomy (10%), and no opinion (4%). Gas/smoke-filtering systems for laparoscopy were available only to 14% of respondents. SARS-CoV-2 screening protocols utilize one RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (29%), two RNA-RT-PCR 72 hours apart (7%), and IgG/IgM plus RNA RT-PCR (17%); 17% have no screening capacities. Conclusion: Standard acute-care surgery practice patterns changed favoring nonoperative treatment. Testing protocols vary among healthcare systems. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes in acute-care surgery patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"158-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:截至2020年6月9日,2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已影响全球700多万人,造成40多万人死亡。在2020年4月27日举行的泛美创伤学会国际创伤远程大查房会议上,讨论了COVID-19大流行时期的急性护理手术方法。本研究的目的是确定外科医生在大流行期间治疗急性外科疾病的实践模式。材料与方法:探讨COVID-19流行病学、外科患者的流行情况以及急性外科疾病患者在sars - cov -2阳性状态下的治疗方案。采用电子观众反馈系统对参与的外科医生的意见和实践模式进行评估。使用Excel软件2018执行、存储和随后分析未识别的数据收集。结果:来自20个国家的91人参加了会议。46名外科医生参与了调查,其中36%的外科医生在超过80名活跃的COVID-19住院患者的医院执业。参与研究的外科医生中有48%为sars - cov2阳性(CoV+)患者提供过手术护理。在医患互动时,58%的外科医生不知道CoV+状态。外科医生报告在大流行期间改变了手术模式。CoV+急性胆囊炎患者仅使用抗生素治疗(64%),IR引流(12%),腹腔镜-(5%),开腹胆囊切除术(12%),无意见(7%)。对于急性阑尾炎,57%的外科医生倾向于仅使用抗生素,而开放手术(29%)、腹腔镜阑尾切除术(10%)和无意见(4%)。只有14%的应答者有腹腔镜检查用的气体/烟雾过滤系统。SARS-CoV-2筛查方案采用1种RNA实时聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)(29%)、2种间隔72小时的RNA-RT-PCR(7%)和IgG/IgM + RNA RT-PCR (17%);17%没有筛选能力。结论:标准的急诊外科实践模式改变有利于非手术治疗。测试方案因医疗保健系统而异。需要进一步的研究来了解COVID-19大流行对急诊手术患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Pandemic Acute-care Surgery Practice Survey Results from the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Tele-Grand Rounds
Objective: As of June 9, 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than 7 million people worldwide, causing more than 400,000 deaths. Acute-care surgery approaches in times of the COVID-19 pandemic were discussed during the Panamerican Trauma Society International Trauma Tele-Grand Rounds meeting in April 27, 2020. The purpose of this study is to identity practice patterns among surgeons treating acute surgical diseases during the pandemic. Materials and methods: COVID-19 epidemiology, prevalence in surgical patients, and treatment options of patients with acute surgical diseases in the presence of SARS-CoV-2-positive status were discussed. An electronic audience response system was used to assess opinions and practice patterns of the participating surgeons. Deidentified data collection was performed, stored, and subsequently analyzed using Excel software 2018. Results: The conference was attended by 91 participants from 20 countries. Forty-six surgeons participated in the survey, with 36% practising at a hospital with >80 active COVID-19 inpatients. Forty-eight percent of the participating surgeons had provided surgical care for SARS-CoV2-positive (CoV+) patients. At the time of provider–patient interaction, 58% of surgeons were not aware of the CoV+ status. Surgeons reported changing practice patterns during the pandemic. They would treat CoV+ patients with acute cholecystitis with antibiotics only (64%), IR drain (12%), laparoscopic-(5%), open cholecystectomy (12%), and no opinion (7%). For acute appendicitis, 57% of surgeons favor antibiotics only vs open-(29%), laparoscopic appendicectomy (10%), and no opinion (4%). Gas/smoke-filtering systems for laparoscopy were available only to 14% of respondents. SARS-CoV-2 screening protocols utilize one RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (29%), two RNA-RT-PCR 72 hours apart (7%), and IgG/IgM plus RNA RT-PCR (17%); 17% have no screening capacities. Conclusion: Standard acute-care surgery practice patterns changed favoring nonoperative treatment. Testing protocols vary among healthcare systems. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes in acute-care surgery patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信