Simpus和Promem作为图书馆管理系统:质量度量

Andi Ibrahim, Saenal Abidin, Asdar
{"title":"Simpus和Promem作为图书馆管理系统:质量度量","authors":"Andi Ibrahim, Saenal Abidin, Asdar","doi":"10.24252/kah.v11i1a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many libraries have used technology-based management services extensively. However, not all of them can live up to the standards stipulated by the library. This study will use the PIECES method to assess Simpus and Promem's level of excellence. This technique is one of the approaches for evaluating the program's library information system's level of quality. The population of this descriptive research, which uses a quantitative methodology, is 905 people, with a sample size of 90 respondents. The data is collected via online survey as a research tool and accidental sampling. The data analysis procedure used the PIECES analysis method and descriptive statistical analysis. The study's findings show that Simpus and Promem's quality level employs the PIECES analysis method for each indicator, with the performance indicator receiving a score of 4.96 (very high), the information indicator receiving a score of 3.92 (high), the economic indicator receiving a score of 3.98 (high), the control indicator receiving a score of 3.78 (high), the efficiency indicator receiving a score of 3.94 (high), and the service indicator receiving a score of 4.0 (high). Thus, this demonstrates that performance has the best quality of the six indicators, and control has the lowest rate. \n ","PeriodicalId":32089,"journal":{"name":"Khizanah alHikmah","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simpus and Promem as Library Management System: the Quality Measurement\",\"authors\":\"Andi Ibrahim, Saenal Abidin, Asdar\",\"doi\":\"10.24252/kah.v11i1a5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many libraries have used technology-based management services extensively. However, not all of them can live up to the standards stipulated by the library. This study will use the PIECES method to assess Simpus and Promem's level of excellence. This technique is one of the approaches for evaluating the program's library information system's level of quality. The population of this descriptive research, which uses a quantitative methodology, is 905 people, with a sample size of 90 respondents. The data is collected via online survey as a research tool and accidental sampling. The data analysis procedure used the PIECES analysis method and descriptive statistical analysis. The study's findings show that Simpus and Promem's quality level employs the PIECES analysis method for each indicator, with the performance indicator receiving a score of 4.96 (very high), the information indicator receiving a score of 3.92 (high), the economic indicator receiving a score of 3.98 (high), the control indicator receiving a score of 3.78 (high), the efficiency indicator receiving a score of 3.94 (high), and the service indicator receiving a score of 4.0 (high). Thus, this demonstrates that performance has the best quality of the six indicators, and control has the lowest rate. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":32089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khizanah alHikmah\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khizanah alHikmah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v11i1a5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khizanah alHikmah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v11i1a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多图书馆广泛使用了基于技术的管理服务。然而,并不是所有的人都能达到图书馆规定的标准。本研究将使用PIECES方法来评估Simpus和Promem的卓越水平。该技术是评价项目图书馆信息系统质量水平的方法之一。本描述性研究采用定量方法,人口为905人,样本量为90人。数据的收集是通过在线调查作为研究工具和偶然抽样。数据分析程序采用了PIECES分析方法和描述性统计分析。研究结果表明,Simpus and Promem的质量水平对各指标采用了PIECES分析方法,其中绩效指标得分为4.96分(非常高),信息指标得分为3.92分(高),经济指标得分为3.98分(高),控制指标得分为3.78分(高),效率指标得分为3.94分(高),服务指标得分为4.0分(高)。由此可见,在六个指标中,绩效的质量最好,而控制的质量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simpus and Promem as Library Management System: the Quality Measurement
Many libraries have used technology-based management services extensively. However, not all of them can live up to the standards stipulated by the library. This study will use the PIECES method to assess Simpus and Promem's level of excellence. This technique is one of the approaches for evaluating the program's library information system's level of quality. The population of this descriptive research, which uses a quantitative methodology, is 905 people, with a sample size of 90 respondents. The data is collected via online survey as a research tool and accidental sampling. The data analysis procedure used the PIECES analysis method and descriptive statistical analysis. The study's findings show that Simpus and Promem's quality level employs the PIECES analysis method for each indicator, with the performance indicator receiving a score of 4.96 (very high), the information indicator receiving a score of 3.92 (high), the economic indicator receiving a score of 3.98 (high), the control indicator receiving a score of 3.78 (high), the efficiency indicator receiving a score of 3.94 (high), and the service indicator receiving a score of 4.0 (high). Thus, this demonstrates that performance has the best quality of the six indicators, and control has the lowest rate.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信