高校图书馆员信息素养技能与科研支持服务的关系

Q3 Social Sciences

Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.47657/5329

Sakhawat Ali, S. Ahmed, Muhammad Tariq Latif

{"title":"高校图书馆员信息素养技能与科研支持服务的关系","authors":"Sakhawat Ali, S. Ahmed, Muhammad Tariq Latif","doi":"10.47657/5329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current research is to determine the correlation between the Pakistani university librarians' information literacy skills (ILSs) and their provided research support services (RSSs) to faculty/researchers. To collect data from the respondents a purposive sampling technique was used. A questionnaire was managed offline as well as online to collect data from 259 librarians of the universities of Pakistan. The tool consisted of eight dimensions of ILSs and four of RSSs. The Pearson correlation coefficient test was applied to gauge the strength of the correlation between ILSs and RSSs. The findings reveal that there is a strong positive significant correlation between all of the factors of ILSs and RSSs except for three sub-factors whose correlation is medium. The value of the overall correlation between ILSs and RSSs is r = .80 which indicates a strong positive significant correlation. The study reveals that ILSs of the university librarians are imperative and a precondition for offering better RSSs.","PeriodicalId":52112,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the University Librarians’ Information Literacy Skills and Research Support Services\",\"authors\":\"Sakhawat Ali, S. Ahmed, Muhammad Tariq Latif\",\"doi\":\"10.47657/5329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the current research is to determine the correlation between the Pakistani university librarians' information literacy skills (ILSs) and their provided research support services (RSSs) to faculty/researchers. To collect data from the respondents a purposive sampling technique was used. A questionnaire was managed offline as well as online to collect data from 259 librarians of the universities of Pakistan. The tool consisted of eight dimensions of ILSs and four of RSSs. The Pearson correlation coefficient test was applied to gauge the strength of the correlation between ILSs and RSSs. The findings reveal that there is a strong positive significant correlation between all of the factors of ILSs and RSSs except for three sub-factors whose correlation is medium. The value of the overall correlation between ILSs and RSSs is r = .80 which indicates a strong positive significant correlation. The study reveals that ILSs of the university librarians are imperative and a precondition for offering better RSSs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47657/5329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47657/5329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定巴基斯坦大学图书馆员的信息素养技能(ILSs)与其向教师/研究人员提供的研究支持服务(rss)之间的相关性。为了从受访者那里收集数据，采用了有目的的抽样技术。在线下和线上同时管理了一份调查问卷，从巴基斯坦大学的259名图书馆员那里收集数据。该工具包括8个维度的ILSs和4个维度的rss。应用Pearson相关系数检验来衡量ILSs与rss之间的相关强度。结果显示，ILSs与RSSs除3个子因子呈中等相关性外，其余因子均呈显著正相关。ILSs与RSSs的总体相关值为r = 0.80，呈强正显著相关。研究表明，高校图书馆馆员的专业素养是提供更好的rss服务的必要条件和前提。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Correlation between the University Librarians’ Information Literacy Skills and Research Support Services

The purpose of the current research is to determine the correlation between the Pakistani university librarians' information literacy skills (ILSs) and their provided research support services (RSSs) to faculty/researchers. To collect data from the respondents a purposive sampling technique was used. A questionnaire was managed offline as well as online to collect data from 259 librarians of the universities of Pakistan. The tool consisted of eight dimensions of ILSs and four of RSSs. The Pearson correlation coefficient test was applied to gauge the strength of the correlation between ILSs and RSSs. The findings reveal that there is a strong positive significant correlation between all of the factors of ILSs and RSSs except for three sub-factors whose correlation is medium. The value of the overall correlation between ILSs and RSSs is r = .80 which indicates a strong positive significant correlation. The study reveals that ILSs of the university librarians are imperative and a precondition for offering better RSSs.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： The PJIM&L is a double-blind refereed scholarly journal. It is committed to publish original research articles, scholarly critiques and conceptual contributions to the areas of Information Management, Information Science and Librarianship. Ideas and views expressed in papers published in the PJIM&L is the sole responsibility of authors. It does not necessarily reflect opinion/policy of the Department or Editorial Advisory Board.