分析师的现金流预测与股票推荐盈利能力的关系

IF 4.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Shanshan Pan, Z. Xu
{"title":"分析师的现金流预测与股票推荐盈利能力的关系","authors":"Shanshan Pan, Z. Xu","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-05-2019-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine whether analysts’ cash flow forecasts improve the profitability of their stock recommendations and whether the positive effect of cash flow forecasts on analysts’ stock recommendation performance varies with firms’ earnings quality. Design/methodology/approach - To test the authors’ predictions, they identify a sample of 161,673 stock recommendations with contemporaneous earnings forecasts and/or cash flow forecasts and regress market-adjusted stock returns on a binary variable that proxies for the issuance of cash flow forecasts while controlling for contemporaneous earnings forecast accuracy, earnings quality, analysts’ forecast experience and capability and certain firm characteristics. The authors’ test results are robust to alternative measures of recommendation profitability, earnings quality and the use of recommendation revisions instead of recommendation levels. Findings - The authors find that when analysts issue cash flow forecasts concurrently with earnings forecasts, their stock recommendations lead to higher profitability than when they only issue earnings forecasts, after controlling for analysts’ forecast capability. Moreover, the authors document that the contemporaneous positive relationship between cash flow forecasts and recommendations profitability is stronger for firms with low earnings quality than for firms with high earnings quality. The findings suggest that cash flow forecasts issued by analysts in response to market demand likely play a more important role in firm valuation than cash flow forecasts issued by analysts mainly because of supply-side considerations. Research limitations/implications - Future research could build on these findings to conduct further investigation on the alternative incentives for analysts’ forecasts of sales growth and long-term growth rates. Practical implications - These findings may also help investors to better assess the quality of analysts’ research outputs and to identify superior stock recommendations. Originality/value - This study provides insight into the role of cash flow forecasts in firm valuation and adds fresh evidence to the debate on the usefulness of cash flow forecasts. It extends the stream of research on the characteristics of analyst forecasts and increases our knowledge about the role of analysts in the financial market.","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"343-361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of analysts’ cash flow forecasts with stock recommendation profitability\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Pan, Z. Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijaim-05-2019-0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine whether analysts’ cash flow forecasts improve the profitability of their stock recommendations and whether the positive effect of cash flow forecasts on analysts’ stock recommendation performance varies with firms’ earnings quality. Design/methodology/approach - To test the authors’ predictions, they identify a sample of 161,673 stock recommendations with contemporaneous earnings forecasts and/or cash flow forecasts and regress market-adjusted stock returns on a binary variable that proxies for the issuance of cash flow forecasts while controlling for contemporaneous earnings forecast accuracy, earnings quality, analysts’ forecast experience and capability and certain firm characteristics. The authors’ test results are robust to alternative measures of recommendation profitability, earnings quality and the use of recommendation revisions instead of recommendation levels. Findings - The authors find that when analysts issue cash flow forecasts concurrently with earnings forecasts, their stock recommendations lead to higher profitability than when they only issue earnings forecasts, after controlling for analysts’ forecast capability. Moreover, the authors document that the contemporaneous positive relationship between cash flow forecasts and recommendations profitability is stronger for firms with low earnings quality than for firms with high earnings quality. The findings suggest that cash flow forecasts issued by analysts in response to market demand likely play a more important role in firm valuation than cash flow forecasts issued by analysts mainly because of supply-side considerations. Research limitations/implications - Future research could build on these findings to conduct further investigation on the alternative incentives for analysts’ forecasts of sales growth and long-term growth rates. Practical implications - These findings may also help investors to better assess the quality of analysts’ research outputs and to identify superior stock recommendations. Originality/value - This study provides insight into the role of cash flow forecasts in firm valuation and adds fresh evidence to the debate on the usefulness of cash flow forecasts. It extends the stream of research on the characteristics of analyst forecasts and increases our knowledge about the role of analysts in the financial market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"343-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2019-0055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2019-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的——本文的目的是检验分析师的现金流量预测是否会提高其股票推荐的盈利能力,以及现金流量预测对分析师股票推荐绩效的积极影响是否会随着公司盈余质量的不同而变化。设计/方法/方法——为了检验作者的预测,他们选取了161673只带有同期盈利预测和/或现金流量预测的股票推荐样本,并将市场调整后的股票回报回归到一个二元变量上,该变量代表现金流量预测的发布,同时控制同期盈利预测的准确性、盈利质量、分析师的预测经验和能力以及某些公司特征。作者的测试结果对于推荐盈利能力、盈利质量和使用推荐修正而不是推荐水平的替代措施是稳健的。研究发现——在控制了分析师的预测能力后,当分析师在发布盈利预测的同时发布现金流量预测时,他们的股票推荐比只发布盈利预测时带来更高的盈利能力。此外,作者还发现,与高盈余质量的公司相比,低盈余质量的公司的现金流量预测和建议盈利能力之间的同时正相关关系更强。研究结果表明,分析师根据市场需求发布的现金流量预测可能比分析师主要出于供应方面考虑而发布的现金流量预测在公司估值中发挥更重要的作用。研究的局限性/影响——未来的研究可以建立在这些发现的基础上,对分析师预测销售增长和长期增长率的其他激励因素进行进一步调查。实际意义-这些发现也可以帮助投资者更好地评估分析师研究成果的质量,并确定优质的股票建议。独创性/价值——本研究提供了对现金流量预测在公司估值中的作用的见解,并为关于现金流量预测有用性的辩论增添了新的证据。它扩展了对分析师预测特征的研究流,并增加了我们对分析师在金融市场中的作用的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association of analysts’ cash flow forecasts with stock recommendation profitability
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine whether analysts’ cash flow forecasts improve the profitability of their stock recommendations and whether the positive effect of cash flow forecasts on analysts’ stock recommendation performance varies with firms’ earnings quality. Design/methodology/approach - To test the authors’ predictions, they identify a sample of 161,673 stock recommendations with contemporaneous earnings forecasts and/or cash flow forecasts and regress market-adjusted stock returns on a binary variable that proxies for the issuance of cash flow forecasts while controlling for contemporaneous earnings forecast accuracy, earnings quality, analysts’ forecast experience and capability and certain firm characteristics. The authors’ test results are robust to alternative measures of recommendation profitability, earnings quality and the use of recommendation revisions instead of recommendation levels. Findings - The authors find that when analysts issue cash flow forecasts concurrently with earnings forecasts, their stock recommendations lead to higher profitability than when they only issue earnings forecasts, after controlling for analysts’ forecast capability. Moreover, the authors document that the contemporaneous positive relationship between cash flow forecasts and recommendations profitability is stronger for firms with low earnings quality than for firms with high earnings quality. The findings suggest that cash flow forecasts issued by analysts in response to market demand likely play a more important role in firm valuation than cash flow forecasts issued by analysts mainly because of supply-side considerations. Research limitations/implications - Future research could build on these findings to conduct further investigation on the alternative incentives for analysts’ forecasts of sales growth and long-term growth rates. Practical implications - These findings may also help investors to better assess the quality of analysts’ research outputs and to identify superior stock recommendations. Originality/value - This study provides insight into the role of cash flow forecasts in firm valuation and adds fresh evidence to the debate on the usefulness of cash flow forecasts. It extends the stream of research on the characteristics of analyst forecasts and increases our knowledge about the role of analysts in the financial market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信